OLR BILL ANALYSIS
sSB 285
AN ACT CONCERNING THE POSSESSION OF POTENTIALLY
DANGEROUS ANIMALS
SUMMARY: This bill limits the scope of a law that bans
the possession of potentially dangerous animals. It
allows people who have illegally possessed such animals
to keep them if they register with the Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP). It increases penalties
for illegal possession and requires DEP to adopt
regulations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage
FURTHER EXPLANATION
Species Affected
With limited exceptions, current law bans possession of
animals in the cat, dog, and bear families (felidae,
canidae, and ursidae) as well as named species in these
families such as lions, tigers, and bears. The bill
limits the scope of the law to the named species, plus
any other species or animal that DEP determines is
potentially dangerous. It also bans possession of:
1. a wolf or coyote hybrid, coy dog, or any other
kind of hybrid wild canid;
2. the offspring of a wild canid (member of
canidae family) or hybrid wild canid and a
domestic dog or hybrid wild canid; and
3. the offspring of any wild felid or hybrid wild
felid and a domestic cat or hybrid wild felid.
The last ban does not apply to domesticated show or pet
cats registered with a nationally or internationally
recognized breeding association or registry that
certifies that it has not had any wild felid ancestors
for the past three generations. Current DEP practice
bans possession of animals in the three families with
any wild ancestry.
Exempt Owners
Current law exempts individuals who legally possessed
potentially dangerous animals before May 24, 1983 from
the possession ban. The bill expands this exemption to
include anyone who owns animals covered by existing law
and the bill on or before January 1, 1994 who registers
the animal with the DEP commissioner by October 1,
1994.
Current law exempts certain institutions from the ban.
The bill eliminates the exemption for municipal parks,
and specifies that the exemption for zoos and nature
centers is limited to public non-profit institutions.
It allows museums, laboratories, and research
facilities affiliated with scientific and educational
facilities, as well as those maintained by such
institutions, to legally possess the animals.
After October 1, 1994, no one can breed banned animals,
import them into the state, or export them to other
states.
Penalty
The bill eliminates the DEP commissioner's authority to
seize potentially dangerous animals and, instead,
requires him to adopt regulations for the seizure and
disposal of the animals, including notice and hearing
procedures that allow the owner a reasonable
opportunity to contest his action.
It increases the penalty for illegal possession. Under
current law, violators are subject to a fine of up to
$100. The bill sets the penalty at a fine of between
$200 and $500, imprisonment for 30 days to six months,
or both. It specifies that each illegally possessed
animal is a separate offense. It also makes anyone who
violates the law liable for the state's reasonable
costs and expenses in investigating and prosecuting the
violation.
Regulations
In addition to the regulations described above, DEP
must adopt regulations providing objective criteria for
(1) defining exempt institutions and (2) issuing
approvals needed to possess wild or exotic animals.
COMMITTEE ACTION
Environment Committee
Joint Favorable Substitute
Yea 23 Nay 3