OLR BILL ANALYSIS sSB 285 AN ACT CONCERNING THE POSSESSION OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ANIMALS SUMMARY: This bill limits the scope of a law that bans the possession of potentially dangerous animals. It allows people who have illegally possessed such animals to keep them if they register with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). It increases penalties for illegal possession and requires DEP to adopt regulations. EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage FURTHER EXPLANATION Species Affected With limited exceptions, current law bans possession of animals in the cat, dog, and bear families (felidae, canidae, and ursidae) as well as named species in these families such as lions, tigers, and bears. The bill limits the scope of the law to the named species, plus any other species or animal that DEP determines is potentially dangerous. It also bans possession of: 1. a wolf or coyote hybrid, coy dog, or any other kind of hybrid wild canid; 2. the offspring of a wild canid (member of canidae family) or hybrid wild canid and a domestic dog or hybrid wild canid; and 3. the offspring of any wild felid or hybrid wild felid and a domestic cat or hybrid wild felid. The last ban does not apply to domesticated show or pet cats registered with a nationally or internationally recognized breeding association or registry that certifies that it has not had any wild felid ancestors for the past three generations. Current DEP practice bans possession of animals in the three families with any wild ancestry. Exempt Owners Current law exempts individuals who legally possessed potentially dangerous animals before May 24, 1983 from the possession ban. The bill expands this exemption to include anyone who owns animals covered by existing law and the bill on or before January 1, 1994 who registers the animal with the DEP commissioner by October 1, 1994. Current law exempts certain institutions from the ban. The bill eliminates the exemption for municipal parks, and specifies that the exemption for zoos and nature centers is limited to public non-profit institutions. It allows museums, laboratories, and research facilities affiliated with scientific and educational facilities, as well as those maintained by such institutions, to legally possess the animals. After October 1, 1994, no one can breed banned animals, import them into the state, or export them to other states. Penalty The bill eliminates the DEP commissioner's authority to seize potentially dangerous animals and, instead, requires him to adopt regulations for the seizure and disposal of the animals, including notice and hearing procedures that allow the owner a reasonable opportunity to contest his action. It increases the penalty for illegal possession. Under current law, violators are subject to a fine of up to $100. The bill sets the penalty at a fine of between $200 and $500, imprisonment for 30 days to six months, or both. It specifies that each illegally possessed animal is a separate offense. It also makes anyone who violates the law liable for the state's reasonable costs and expenses in investigating and prosecuting the violation. Regulations In addition to the regulations described above, DEP must adopt regulations providing objective criteria for (1) defining exempt institutions and (2) issuing approvals needed to possess wild or exotic animals. COMMITTEE ACTION Environment Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 23 Nay 3