Privacy and State Agencies

Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act and the Dept. of Motor Vehicles

Some information collected and maintained by a state agency can have value and use to entities outside the agency. This value goes beyond a citizen's or newspaper's ease of accessibility to information showing how government operates and gets into areas that can be termed secondary uses. Motor vehicle records are a prime example. The Department of Motor Vehicles collects and maintains literally millions of records related to individuals and vehicles. There are 2.3 million licensed operators in Connecticut and 2.7 million registered motor vehicles.1

Among DMV data are records about who owns what kinds of cars, information with many potential uses. When an auto defect is found in a three-year-old model, and recall notices are required, manufacturers go to motor vehicle departments for their registration information. This same information could be attractive for general marketing purposes, but as will be shown, under current DMV law, DMV information is not accessible for that use.

In contrast to the numerous state statutes that totally prohibit public disclosure, the law governing motor vehicle records is an example of a law that attempts to regulate, but not totally prohibit, disclosure of personal information.

Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act. In 1994, Congress enacted the federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) in response to concerns about stalkers getting residential addresses from state motor vehicle departments. The act prohibited these departments from disclosing personal information about a person in connection with a motor vehicle record, except for "permissible uses" as provided in the federal law.2 In 1997, the Connecticut state legislature responded by passing P.A. 97-266. The act, codified in C.G.S. Section 14-10, in large part copies the language of the federal act.

Under the Connecticut law, personal information is defined as: information that identifies an individual and includes an individual's photograph or computerized image, SS#, operators license number, name, address other than zipcode, telephone number, or medical or disability information, but does not include information on motor vehicle accidents or violations, or information relative to the status of an operator's license, registration or insurance coverage.

Permissible uses. Section 14-10(f) of the Connecticut General Statutes sets out to whom DMV can disclose personal information from a motor vehicle record3, which is as follows:

1. Any federal, state or local government agency in carrying out its functions or to anyone acting on behalf of any of those entities;

2. Any individual, organization or entity that files with the commissioner a form approved by the commissioner under penalty of false statement, along with "such supporting documentation or information as the commissioner may require" that says the information will be used for any of the following purposes:

In addition to the permissible uses, the commissioner may disclose personal information contained in any motor vehicle record to any individual who is the subject of the information, or to any person who certifies under penalty of false statement that he or she has the express consent of the subject of the personal information.

How Law Implemented

Personal information is distributed in three ways under Connecticut's version of the Driver Privacy Protection Act at DMV. The common factor for information distribution is that any request must fit into one of the acceptable statutory reasons for disclosure.

Volume contracts. Currently, there are 18 volume contracts for DMV file information. The majority are for access to driver history data and registration data for parking ticket inquiries. DMV reports the largest user of driver history data, a company called Choicepoint, indicates almost all its business is insurance-related.

The contracts for driver history information have several specific provisions regulating the use of the information received from DMV.

The contracts for registration information for parking ticket inquiries contain similar restrictions. Similarly, the contractor supplies the state with registration numbers to match numbers on file with the state. The contractor is required to create a program to compare manufacturer's make and model on the parking ticket with the information provided from DMV registration information, to detect errors and prevent notices from being sent to the wrong person. No notice may be sent unless the inquiry matches all criteria-make and model and registration number.

According to DMV, until a year ago, little to no contract compliance monitoring occurred due to resource constraints. In the last year, one DMV employee has done some compliance testing, but the department believes more should be done.

In state FY 1999-2000, $8.6 million was received by the state from these volume contracts.

Non-volume requests. Motor vehicle record information can also be obtained by an individual request either by mail or in person at DMV, using a DMV form and paying the pertinent fees. Like the volume requestors, an individual request must be for one of the permitted uses listed above. No record information is given over the phone.

A copy of the J-23 form is attached for ease of understanding (Attachment B). For perspective, in state fiscal year 1999-2000, the two most frequently requested documents were driver history files (26,049) and registration file information (13,876).5 There are some key things to know about the J-23 process.

1 Digest of Annual Reports, 2000

2 The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law in 1999 as within the commerce clause of the Constitution. Also effective in 1999 were amendments to the DPPA that include a new category of "sensitive personal information" and make other changes to certain uses.

3 A motor vehicle record means any record that pertains to an operator's license, learner's permit, identity card, registration, certificate of title or any other document issued by DMV.

4 See Davis v. FOIC, (CV 000502561) April 30, 2001, where a Superior Court judge held statutory prohibition against disclosure of motor vehicle records only applies to DMV and not to the municipal tax assessors to whom DMV sends registration information; the statutory right of taxpayers to access to grand list outweighs need for motor vehicle confidentiality.

5 A driver history file shows name, residential address, birthdate, operator's license number and expiration date, number of points and any traffic violations in the last two years, and the status of those violations. A registration file shows name and address of the person to whom the car is registered, birthdate, marker plate number, vehicle identification number, description of car, and the registration expiration date.

 

Return to Year 2001 studies

Return to Table of Contents