Connecticut Seal

General Assembly

File No. 544

    February Session, 2018

Substitute House Joint Resolution No. 92

House of Representatives, April 17, 2018

The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP. TONG of the 147th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute joint resolution ought to be adopted.

RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES.

Resolved by this Assembly:

Section 1. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23782 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Denny Cabral, is confirmed.

Sec. 2. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 22617 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ozzie Gooding, is confirmed.

Sec. 3. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24002 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Dean B. Holliday, Sr., is confirmed.

Sec. 4. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 22965 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Zenon Kolakowski, is confirmed.

Sec. 5. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23838 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Linda Kulmann, is confirmed.

Sec. 6. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24076 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Justice M. Law AKA Justice C. Luciano, is confirmed.

Sec. 7. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24612 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Vivek Reddy, is confirmed.

Sec. 8. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23655 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Joseph Sigan, is confirmed.

Sec. 9. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23089 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Suzanne Smith, is confirmed.

Sec. 10. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23272 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Jane Vizi, is confirmed.

Sec. 11. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23273 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Richard Vizi, is confirmed.

Sec. 12. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23727 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Jeffrey Weed, is confirmed.

Sec. 13. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24638 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ramone White, is confirmed.

JUD

Joint Favorable Subst.

 

The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst's professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.


OFA Fiscal Note

State Impact: None

Municipal Impact: None

Explanation

The resolution states the decision of the Claims Commissioner to dismiss several claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars will not result in a fiscal impact.

The Out Years

State Impact: None

Municipal Impact: None

OLR Bill Analysis

sHJ 92

RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES.

SUMMARY

The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Resolutions.

COMMITTEE ACTION

Judiciary Committee

Joint Favorable Substitute

Yea

38

Nay

3

(04/03/2018)

TOP