OLR Bill Analysis

sHB 7311

AN ACT CONCERNING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND BUSINESS CORPORATIONS.

SUMMARY

This bill makes numerous changes to statutes governing limited liability companies (LLCs) and business corporations. Principally, it (1) authorizes the formation of “series LLCs,” which are LLCs consisting of one or more “protected series” ( 1-33); (2) revises the Connecticut Business Corporation Act ( 34-57 & 76-77); and (3) makes minor and technical changes to the Connecticut Uniform LLC Act, which was passed in 2016 and is effective July 1, 2017 ( 58-75).

The bill prescribes how series LLCs may be formed and the relationship between the LLC and a protected series, as well as the relationship between each protected series. Among other things, it also does the following:

1. generally grants to a protected series the same powers that existing law grants to LLCs;

2. specifies that a (a) series LLC's debt, obligation, or liability is solely the LLC's and (b) protected series' debt, obligation, or liability is solely the series';

3. specifies conditions for when claims against a (a) series LLC may be enforced against a protected series and (b) protected series may be enforced against the series LLC or another protected series; and

4. requires a protected series of a foreign series LLC to separately register with the secretary of the state (SOTS) in order to do business in Connecticut.

With respect to corporations, the bill principally does the following:

1. establishes standards for director liability that are separate from those for director conduct ( 34-35),

2. establishes a statutory process for corporations to ratify and validate certain defective actions ( 36-43),

3. allows a corporation's certificate of incorporation to waive or limit a requirement that directors and officers disclose certain outside business opportunities ( 44-47),

4. establishes a process under which a merger or share exchange may be effectuated without shareholder approval ( 48-52),

5. allows the certificate of incorporation or bylaws to require that any or all internal corporate claims be brought exclusively in certain courts ( 53), and

6. makes minor changes to certain definitions ( 54-57 & 76-77).

The bill also makes numerous minor, technical, and conforming changes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2017, for the Uniform LLC Act provisions; October 1, 2017, for the corporation-related provisions; and October 1, 2018, for the series LLC provisions.

1-33 — SERIES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES

Introduction

Generally, a “series LLC” is an LLC that serves as an umbrella organization for one or more separate entities, each called a “protected series.” While a standard LLC provides its members with a “vertical” liability shield from creditors, a series LLC provides both vertical and “horizontal” shields. The horizontal shield protects certain assets of the protected series (known as “associated assets”) from creditors of another protected series or of the series LLC itself.

Formation ( 10-12 & 14-15)

The bill allows an LLC to establish a protected series with the consent of all members of the company. The LLC must deliver to SOTS a protected series designation, signed by the company and stating its name and the name of the protected series. The LLC may amend a protected series designation by delivering to SOTS a statement of designation change that changes the company's name, the protected series' name, or both.

Under the bill, a protected series' name must comply with all naming requirements established in existing law for LLCs (e.g., be distinguishable from the names of other persons registered to do business in the state). Additionally, it must begin or end with the company's name and contain the phrase “Protected Series” or “protected series,” or the abbreviation “PS” or “P.S.” The bill requires series LLCs to include in their annual report to SOTS the name of each protected series.

Under the bill, unless otherwise designated, a series LLC's registered agent in Connecticut serves as the registered agent for each protected series. If the person ceases to be the series LLC's registered agent, then the person also ceases to be each protected series' registered agent.

The bill (1) requires SOTS to issue a certificate of good standing for a protected series upon the request of any person and (2) specifies the certificate's required contents (e.g., the effective date of the certificate of designation).

Powers and Relationship to Company and Other Protected Series ( 2 & 4-5)

Under the bill, a protected series is distinct from the series LLC (i.e., the company), any other protected series of the company, members of the company, protected series transferees of any protected series of the company, and transferees of transferable interests of the company. The bill defines a “protected series transferee” as a person to which all or part of a protected series transferable interest (i.e., the right to receive a distribution from the series) has been transferred. It includes a person owed such an interest as a result of ceasing to be an associated member of a protected series.

The bill generally grants a protected series the same powers that existing law grants to LLCs and allows a protected series to sue and be sued in its own name. A protected series cannot (1) continue to exist after the series LLC that established it completes its winding up; (2) be a member of the company or establish a protected series; (3) have a protected series transferable interest, management or voting right, or any other right in another protected series of the company; or (4) be a party to a merger, interest exchange, conversion, domestication, or comparable transaction.

Extrapolation ( 3)

Under specified circumstances (see below), the bill deems (1) a protected series to be an LLC organized separately from the series LLC that established it and (2) certain “constructs” at the protected series level as fulfilling the analogous construct at the LLC level. It thus deems the protected series' associated members, transferees, transferable interests, series managers, assets, and creditors or obligees as fulfilling these constructs for an LLC.

The bill applies these provisions to (1) situations where existing LLC laws govern protected series matters, (2) limitations on operating agreement variations, and (3) certain aspects of protected series dissolutions.

The bill specifies that these provisions do not apply if their application would require SOTS to (1) accept for filing a type of record that neither the bill nor existing law governing LLCs authorizes or requires a person to file or (2) make or deliver a record that neither the bill nor existing law governing LLCs authorizes or requires SOTS to make or deliver.

Governing Authority ( 6-7)

Under the bill, matters involving a protected series are governed both by state law and the series LLC's operating agreement (i.e., an agreement of all of the company's members that governs specified matters). Table 1 below lists the matters governed by the law and operating agreement, respectively.

Table 1: Protected Series Governing Authority

Governed by Existing State Law

Governed by Operating Agreement

Protected series' internal affairs

Protected series' relations with the following:

the series LLC that created it

other protected series of the company

a member that is not an associated member of the protected series

a protected series manager that is not a protected series manager of that series

a protected series transferee that is not a protected series transferee of that series

Liability of a person, series LLC, or protected series for certain debts, obligations, and liabilities

Protected series' internal affairs

Relations among the protected series, series LLC, and any other protected series of the company

Relations between (1) the protected series, its protected series manager, any associated member of the protected series, or any other protected series transferee of the protected series and (2) another person in that person's capacity as a member or transferee of the company or a protected series transferee or protected series manager of another protected series

If the series LLC's operating agreement does not provide for a matter listed in the table, then the bill's provisions govern the matter. If the bill does not provide for one of these matters, then existing state LLC law governs the matter, subject to the above extrapolation rules.

Operating Agreements ( 8 & 9)

Under the bill, if existing law prohibits an operating agreement adopted under the Connecticut Uniform LLC Act from varying a provision of that act or limits the extent to which it may vary such a provision, then the prohibition, limitation, or restriction applies to matters under the bill for series LLCs.

Additionally, the bill enumerates 21 specific provisions that a series LLC's operating agreement cannot vary. These provisions include (1) a protected series' capacity to sue and be sued in its own name; (2) requirements and procedures for establishing a protected series, making an asset an associated asset, and enforcing claims against non-associated assets (see below); and (3) judgment creditors' rights. (Please refer to 9 of the bill for a complete list of provisions that cannot be varied.)

Service ( 13)

Under the bill, service of processes, notices, demands, or other records to a protected series may be accomplished by serving the series LLC or the protected series' registered agent, or by other means authorized by existing law. Service of a summons and complaint on a (1) series LLC constitutes notice to each protected series and (2) protected series constitutes notice to the company and any other protected series.

Assets ( 2 & 16)

Generally, a protected series' assets must be deemed “associated assets” of the series in order to be protected from creditors of the series LLC or the company's other protected series. The bill defines “asset” as property in which a series LLC or protected series has rights or as to which the company or series may transfer rights.

The bill establishes several requirements that a protected series' assets must meet in order to be deemed associated assets of the series. Generally, the series LLC must create and maintain a record or set of records that identifies the protected series and describes the asset with sufficient specificity to permit a reasonable, disinterested individual to identify the asset and distinguish it from (1) the series' other assets, (2) the company's assets, and (3) assets of the company's other protected series.

Additionally, if the protected series transfers the associated asset, the record or set of records must state (1) when and to what person the series made the transfer and (2) if the transfer was to the company or another protected series of the company, the payer, payee, and consideration received. A protected series may hold an associated asset directly or indirectly but may not hold the asset in the name of the series LLC or another protected series.

Members, Managers, and Transferable Interest ( 2 & 17-20)

The bill creates a class of persons, known as “associated members,” that have certain powers, rights, and duties with respect to a protected series.

The bill requires that a person be a member of a series LLC in order to be an associated member of a protected series. A person becomes an associated member when the operating agreement or procedure established by the agreement (1) identifies the member as an associated member of the protected series and (2) states what, if any, protected series transferable interest the associated member has in connection with becoming or being an associated member. An associated member may bind the protected series to the same extent that an LLC member may bind the LLC.

Under the bill, only an associated member or the series LLC may initially own a protected series transferable interest. If a protected series has no associated members when it is established, then the series LLC owns the protected series transferable interests. A series LLC may acquire a protected series transferable interest through a transfer from another person or as provided in the operating agreement.

Under the bill, a protected series manager in that capacity owes duties only to the protected series and its associated members. If it has no associated members, then the series LLC serves as the manager. A protected series may have more than one manager.

The bill defines a “protected series manager” as a person under whose (1) authority the protected series' powers are exercised and (2) direction the series' activities and affairs are managed.

Right to Information. The bill establishes for certain parties rights to information about a protected series that are analogous to the rights those parties would have if the protected series were a standard LLC. Table 2 describes these rights in greater detail.

Table 2: Information Rights

Entity

Information Access

Series LLC member that is not an associated member of a protected series

Same manner and extent as a nonmanager member of a manager-managed LLC has to information about the LLC

Former associated member of a protected series

Same manner and extent that a dissociated member of an LLC has to information about the LLC

Legal representative of a deceased associated member of a protected series

Same manner and extent that the legal representative of a deceased member of an LLC has to information about the LLC

Debts and Obligations ( 21)

Under the bill, a series LLC's debt, obligation, or liability is solely the LLC's, and a protected series' debt, obligation, or liability is solely the series'.

Specifically, the series LLC is not liable for the protected series' debts, obligations, and liabilities solely because it (1) established or managed the protected series; (2) had the protected series manage the company; or (3) owned a transferable interest in the protected series. Similarly, a protected series is not liable for the debts, obligations, or liabilities of the series LLC or another protected series solely because it (1) is a protected series of the company or (2) managed, or was managed by, the company or another protected series.

The bill specifies that a person is not liable for (1) a series LLC's debts, obligations, and liabilities solely because of being a manager or associated member of a protected series or (2) a protected series' debts, obligations, and liabilities solely because of being a manager or associated member of a protected series, a member of the series LLC, a manager of the LLC, or having a transferable interest in the protected series.

Under the bill, a claim to disregard these limitations is governed by principles of law and equity that would apply as if the protected series were its own separate LLC.

Claims ( 22-23)

The bill specifies conditions for when claims against (1) a series LLC may be enforced against a protected series and (2) protected series may be enforced against the series LLC or another protected series, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Claims Against Series LLCs and Protected Series

Entity claim was made against

Entity whose assets are sought

Conditions under which claim may be enforced against the assets

Series LLC

Protected series

(1) Asset is a non-associated asset when enforcement is first sought or (2) the protected series owned the asset when liability was incurred, but the asset was a non-associated asset

Protected series

Series LLC

(1) Asset is a non-associated asset when enforcement is first sought or (2) the company owned the asset when liability was incurred, but the asset was a non-associated asset

Protected series

Another protected series

Asset is a non-associated asset when enforcement is first sought

Under the bill, provisions in existing law that provide or restrict remedies available to judgment creditors with respect to standard LLCs likewise apply to judgment creditors of (1) protected series associated members or transferees or (2) a series LLC to the extent it owns a protected series transferable interest.

Dissolution ( 24 & 25)

The bill requires that a protected series dissolve and wind up its activities and affairs upon (1) the series LLC dissolving, (2) the occurrence of an event or circumstance that the operating agreement identifies as triggering dissolution, (3) all members of the protected series affirmatively voting or consenting, or (4) the Superior Court entering an order dissolving the protected series. Under specified circumstances, the court may issue such an order upon the application of (1) a manger or associated member of the protected series or (2) the series LLC or member of the series LLC.

The bill requires a dissolved protected series to wind up its activities and affairs in the same manner that an LLC winds up its affairs under existing law. It specifies that judicial remedies, including judicial supervision, are available to the same extent and under the same conditions as they are to LLCs under existing law. A series LLC does not complete its winding up until each protected series completes winding up.

When a protected series has completed winding up, the series LLC may deliver to SOTS a statement of designation cancellation.

Foreign Series LLCs ( 26-30)

The bill requires a protected series of a foreign series LLC to separately register with SOTS in order to do business in Connecticut (i.e., it must register as if it were its own separate LLC). The protected series must provide SOTS, among other things, the name and home jurisdiction (i.e., the jurisdiction in which it was formed) of the foreign series LLC that established it. The foreign protected series' name must comply with the naming conventions that apply to domestic protected series (see 11).

Under the bill, a foreign series LLC is generally governed by the law of its home jurisdiction. The home jurisdiction's law governs, among other things, (1) a foreign protected series' internal affairs, (2) relations between the protected series and various other entities (e.g., the company and other protected series of the company), and (3) liability for certain debts and obligations.

The bill allows a court to apply Connecticut law rather than the home jurisdiction's law if the court determines that applying the home jurisdiction's law advances a policy or produces a result repugnant to Connecticut's public policy. It also applies its provisions defining protected assets ( 16) and claims ( 22) to assets in Connecticut owned by a foreign series LLC or a foreign protected series.

The bill requires a foreign series LLC or foreign protected series that is party to certain litigation matters to disclose certain information to other parties in the litigation. It must do so within 30 days after it becomes a party to a proceeding before a civil, criminal, administrative, or other adjudicative tribunal of Connecticut, or a federal tribunal located in Connecticut. Generally, a foreign series LLC must disclose information about each of its protected series, and a protected series must disclose information about the series LLC and the company's other protected series.

Prospective Application ( 33)

The bill specifies that its provisions do not affect an action commenced, proceeding brought, or right accrued before October 1, 2018.

34-57 & 76-77 — CONNECTICUT BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT

Standards for Director Conduct and Liability ( 34-35)

Current law prescribes standards of conduct that corporate directors must follow and generally provides that a director is not liable for actions, or failure to take actions, if he or she acted in conformance with these standards. The bill (1) instead establishes standards for director liability that are separate from those for director conduct and (2) makes minor changes to the conduct standards (e.g., explicitly requires a director to disclose certain material information to other board or committee members if not known to them).

With respect to liability, the bill requires that the party asserting liability against a director establish that no defenses interposed by the director preclude liability. These defenses are based on the following:

1. provisions in the certificate of incorporation that (a) limit the amount of money damages a director may personally be liable for or (b) allow him or her to pursue outside business opportunities (see 44-47 below) and

2. provisions in existing law that allow a director, under certain circumstances, to (a) participate in a conflicting interest transaction or (b) take advantage of a business opportunity.

The party asserting liability must also establish that the challenged conduct consisted of or was the result of at least one of the following:

1. an action not in good faith;

2. a decision the director (a) did not reasonably believe to be in the corporation's best interests or (b) was not informed to an extent he or she reasonably believed appropriate;

3. a lack of objectivity due to a relationship (e.g., familial or business) with or lack of independence from another person with a material interest in the challenged conduct, and the challenged conduct was not in the corporation's best interest;

4. the director's sustained failure to devote attention, or timely attention, to ongoing oversight of the corporation's business and affairs; or

5. the director receiving a financial benefit to which he or she was not entitled, or any other breach of his or her duties to deal fairly with the corporation and its shareholders.

The bill also establishes additional burdens (e.g., proving harm) based on the type of damages sought (i.e., money damages or other money payment under a legal or equitable remedy).

The bill specifies that it does not alter (1) a director's liability under provisions in existing law that provide for liability in specific instances, such as unlawful distributions or transactional interests, or (2) the burden of proving fairness or lack thereof in instances where fairness is at issue. Additionally, it does not affect any corporation or shareholder rights under the U.S. Code or other provisions in state law.

Ratifying and Validating Defective Corporate Actions ( 36-43)

The bill establishes a statutory process under which corporations may ratify or validate defective corporate actions, including an overissuance of shares. It specifies that these provisions are not the exclusive means for ratifying or validating defective actions and explicitly authorizes the Superior Court to declare defective actions valid.

Definitions. Table 4 lists the definitions of certain terms relevant to this process.

Table 4: Related Definitions

Term

Definition

Corporate action

Any action taken by or on behalf of the corporation

Defective action

(1) A corporate action purportedly taken that is within the corporation's power (and was within its power at the time it was purportedly taken) but is void or voidable because of a failure of authorization or

(2) an overissue (see below)

Failure of authorization

Failure to authorize, approve, or otherwise effect a corporate action in accordance with state corporation laws, the corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws, a corporate resolution, or any plan or agreement to which the corporation is a party, if and to the extent the failure would render the corporate action void or voidable

Overissue

The purported issuance of shares of a class or series (1) exceeding the number of shares the corporation had the power to issue at the time of the issuance or (2) not then authorized for issuance by the certificate of incorporation

Putative shares

Shares of any class or series that were created or issued as a result of a defective corporate action that (1) would be valid but for the failure of authorization or (2) cannot be determined by the board of directors to be valid shares

Process. To ratify a defective action, the board of directors must take action that states the following:

1. the defective action to be ratified and, if applicable, the number and type of putative shares purportedly issued;

2. the date of the defective action and nature of the authorization failure; and

3. that the board of directors approves the ratification of the defective action.

Under the bill, the quorum and voting requirements that apply to the directors' ratifying action are the same as those that apply to the action to be ratified. The bill also specifies the conditions under which the board may abandon ratification.

The bill establishes a separate process for ratifying the election of the corporation's initial board of directors. Under this process, a majority of the persons exercising directors' powers at the time of ratification may take an action that states the following:

1. the name of the person or persons that first took action in the corporation's name as its initial board of directors;

2. the date on which they first took such action or were purported to have been elected as the initial board, whichever is earlier; and

3. that the ratification of the election of such person or persons as the initial board of directors is approved.

Shareholder Approval. The bill requires, for all defective actions, shareholder approval of the ratification if such approval would have been required for the initial action. It establishes notice, quorum and voting, and other procedural requirements for shareholders' approval of the ratification (e.g., notice of the timeframes for bringing claims related to the validation).

If the ratification of a defective action does not require shareholder approval, the bill requires the corporation to notify all holders of valid and putative shares of the ratification. The bill specifies the notice's required contents.

Ratification Resulting in Overissuance. Under the bill, if ratifying putative shares would result in an overissue, the corporation must also amend its certificate of incorporation to (1) increase the number of shares of a class or series or (2) create a new class or series.

Filings. Under the bill, if a defective corporate action would have required a filing under state corporation laws, then the corporation must file a certificate of validation with SOTS, regardless of whether a filing was previously made. The certificate must identify (1) the defective action and the date it was taken, including information about any putative shares issued; (2) the nature of the failure of authorization; (3) a statement that the defective action was ratified under the bill's provisions, including the date of ratification and shareholder approval, if applicable; and (4) information about any previous filings relating to the action.

If a filing was not previously made but would have been required to effect the defective action, then such a filing must be attached to the certificate. The bill specifies that the certificate of validation amends or substitutes for any other required filing with respect to the defective action.

Effect of Ratification. Under the bill, a ratification becomes effective upon the later of (1) shareholder approval or, if shareholder approval is not required, when notice to the shareholders becomes effective and (2) the time at which the certificate of validation becomes effective. The bill refers to this as the “validation effective time.” Unless ordered by the court, the validation effective time is not affected by pending judicial proceedings.

A defective corporate action ratified under the bill is deemed a valid corporate action as of the date of the defective action. Putative shares are deemed identical shares or fractions of valid shares as of the time they were purportedly issued. The bill makes actions taken in reliance of the defective action, as well as subsequent defective actions resulting directly or indirectly from the original defective action, valid as of the time taken.

Court Action. The bill allows the Superior Court to (1) determine the validity and effectiveness of any corporate action or defective corporate action, or ratification of a defective action; (2) determine the validity of any putative shares; and (3) modify or waive the bill's procedures for ratifying defective corporate actions. It requires that any action challenging the ratification of a defective action or putative shares be brought within 120 days after the validation's effective date.

Notice of Directors' and Officers' Business Opportunities ( 44-47)

Existing law provides a safe harbor for a director considering possible involvement (whether directly or indirectly) with a prospective business opportunity that might constitute a “corporate opportunity.” It allows a director to present a business opportunity to the board or its shareholders for consideration. A director who receives a disclaimer of the corporation's interest in the matter may pursue the opportunity on his or her own behalf with protection from damages or other remedies in a lawsuit brought by the corporation or its shareholders. (Under the common law corporate opportunity doctrine, a corporation has a right to act before its director does on certain business opportunities that come to the director's attention.)

The bill expands this safe harbor protection to cover a corporation's officers, not only its directors. It also allows corporations to include in the certificate of incorporation a provision that limits or eliminates a director's, officer's, or other person's duty to offer the corporation potential business opportunities before these persons pursue the opportunity themselves. In order to apply such a provision to an officer or person related to the officer, the board of directors must approve the application, after the provision's effective date, by action of qualified directors following existing procedures for authorizing conflict of interest transactions. Any application to officers or persons related to them may also be limited by the board.

Existing law generally defines “qualified directors” as those who, with respect to certain actions, are disinterested and independent (i.e., have no conflict of interest). The bill defines “qualified director,” for purposes of limiting or eliminating an officer or related person's corporate opportunity duties, as one (1) to whom the limitation or elimination of an officer's duties to offer potential business opportunities would not apply and (2) who does not have a material relationship with any other person to whom the limitation or elimination would apply.

The bill makes various changes to current law's definition of “related person” for purposes of a corporate opportunity and other conflict of interest provisions. First, it expands the definition to include people relate to officers and other individuals, not just people related to directors as under current law. It also adds the following familial relations with respect to the individual or individual's spouse: stepchild, stepparent, grandparent, stepsibling, half-sibling, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew, or the spouse of any such individual. Finally, it removes a reference to trusts or estates to which a related person is a substantial beneficiary.

The bill also makes various minor and technical changes (e.g., requires that the certificate of incorporation include the mailing address of the corporation's initial registered office, not just the street address).

Shareholder Approval of Two-Step Mergers ( 48-52)

Generally, a two-step merger is one in which the buyer first makes a tender offer to acquire the target company's stock. In the second step, the buyer commences a “back-end” merger to acquire the target company's stock not acquired under the tender offer. Under current law, the plan for such a merger or share exchange is generally subject to shareholder approval.

The bill establishes a process under which a plan of merger or share exchange may be effectuated without shareholder approval unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under the bill, each of the following requirements in the process must be met.

1. The plan must expressly permit or require that it be effected under the bill's provisions as soon as practicable after the tender offer (see Tender Offer below).

2. Another party to the merger, the acquiring corporation in the share exchange, or a parent of such entities, must offer to purchase any and all outstanding shares that, absent the bill's provisions, would be entitled to vote on the merger or exchange. The offer may exclude shares owned at the commencement of the offer by (a) the corporation; (b) the offeror or offeror's parent; or (c) a wholly owned subsidiary of the corporation, offeror, or any wholly owned subsidiary of any of them.

3. The offer must disclose that shares of the corporation not tendered in response to the offer will be acquired for the same consideration set forth in the tender offer (see Outstanding Shares below).

4. The offer must remain open for at least 10 days.

5. The offeror must purchase all shares properly tendered and not properly withdrawn.

6. After the tender offer closes, the buyer must own enough shares to cast at least the minimum number of votes on the merger or exchange that would otherwise be required for approval under current law and the certificate of incorporation (see Tender Offer below).

7. The offeror or wholly owned subsidiary merges with or into the corporation, or effects an exchange in which it acquires shares of the corporation.

8. Shares of the corporation not tendered in response to the offer must be acquired for the same consideration set forth in the tender offer (see Outstanding Shares below).

Tender Offer. Under the bill, the shares identified below must be collectively entitled to cast at least the minimum number of votes on the merger or exchange that would otherwise be required for approval under current law and the certificate of incorporation. These include the following shares:

1. shares purchased by the offeror in accordance with the offer;

2. shares otherwise owned by the offeror or offeror's parent or wholly owned subsidiary; and

3. shares subject to an agreement that are to be transferred, contributed, or delivered to the offeror, parent, or subsidiary in exchange for shares in the offeror, parent, or subsidiary.

Outstanding Shares. Under the bill, each share of each class or series of shares that the offeror offers to purchase, but does not purchase, must be converted into the same amount and kind of securities, interests, obligations, rights, cash, or other property to be paid or exchanged in accordance with the offer for each share of the class or series tendered in response to the offer. The bill specifies that certain types of shares (e.g., those owned by the offeror) do not need to be converted into or exchanged for consideration.

Other Provisions. The bill allows a certificate of incorporation to limit or eliminate, for a merger or share exchange, the separate voting rights possessed by certain classes or series of shares. This provision does not apply if the merger or exchange (1) includes what is or would be in effect an amendment to the certificate of incorporation and (2) does not effect a substantive business combination.

Lastly, the bill makes numerous minor, technical, and conforming changes governing mergers and share exchanges. For example, it specifies (1) that shareholders are entitled to appraisal rights (i.e., a judicial determination of a share's fair value) in connection with the mergers and exchanges authorized under the bill and (2) how shareholders must assert their appraisal rights. It also specifies that a certificate of incorporation cannot limit or eliminate appraisal rights if the class or series does not have the right to vote separately on the action as a voting group, alone, or as part of a group.

Forum for Internal Corporate Claims ( 53)

The bill allows a corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws to require that any or all internal corporate claims be brought exclusively in one or more Connecticut courts or any additional courts in Connecticut or other jurisdictions with which the corporation has a reasonable relationship.

The bill specifies that such a provision does not apply if the specified courts do not have the requisite personal and subject matter jurisdiction. It allows a claim to be brought in a state court not specified in the provision if (1) it has personal and subject matter jurisdiction and (2) none of the specified state courts has such jurisdiction. The bill prohibits the certificate of incorporation or bylaws from barring the use of Connecticut courts for internal corporate claims or requiring that they be determined by arbitration.

The bill defines an internal corporate claim as follows:

1. a claim based on a violation of a duty under state law by a current or former director, officer, or shareholder in such capacity;

2. a derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation;

3. an action that asserts a claim under the state's corporation laws or the certificate of incorporation or bylaws; or

4. any other action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

Definitions ( 54-57 & 76-77)

The bill makes several minor and technical changes to definitions used in the Connecticut Business Corporation Act. For example, it adds definitions to conform to other changes made by the bill (e.g., “acquired” and “acquiring” corporation). It also makes certain definitions (e.g., “merger” and “share exchange”) applicable to the entire act, rather than just a specific group of statutes as under current law.

58-75 — CONNECTICUT UNIFORM LLC ACT

In 2016, the legislature enacted the Connecticut Uniform LLC Act (PA 16-97), which is effective July 1, 2017, and replaces current state law governing LLCs. The bill makes several minor and technical changes to the uniform act, including the following:

1. replaces the phrase “certificate of good standing” with “certificate of legal existence” and eliminates provisions that specify the certificate's required contents;

2. replaces several references to “statement” with references to “certificate”;

3. specifies that the fee for a certificate of legal existence for a foreign LLC is the same as the fee for a certificate for a domestic LLC ($50);

4. requires a foreign LLC to disclose, in its annual report filed with SOTS, the street and mailing address it uses in its home jurisdiction (it must already disclose this information in its registration certificate);

5. eliminates a requirement for a foreign LLC to file an amendment to its registration certificate with SOTS if its address, registered agent, or agent's address changes (under existing law, these changes are disclosed using other forms);

6. specifies that the deadline for a merging LLC to amend or abandon the merger is when the certificate of merger becomes effective, rather than when it is delivered to SOTS; and

7. requires only the surviving LLC, rather than each merging LLC, to deliver a certificate of merger to SOTS.

Additionally, current law requires a foreign LLC to apply to SOTS for a registration transfer if it merges into a foreign entity that is not registered to transact business in Connecticut or converts to a foreign entity required to register with the secretary. The bill limits the use of a registration transfer to mergers in which the foreign LLC merges into another foreign LLC.

COMMITTEE ACTION

Judiciary Committee

Joint Favorable Substitute

Yea

39

Nay

0

(04/04/2017)