Legislative Office Building, Room 5200

Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0200

http: //




LCO No.: 8141

File Copy No.: 287

House Calendar No.: 184

OFA Fiscal Note

State Impact:

Agency Affected


FY 12 $

FY 13 $

Judicial Dept.

GF – Implements Budget

5.2 million

5.2 million

Various State Agencies

GF - Revenue Gain

Greater than 200, 000

Greater than 250, 000

Note: GF=General Fund

Municipal Impact:



FY 12 $

FY 13 $

All Municipalities

Revenue Impact

See Below

See Below

All Municipalities





The amendment strikes the underlying bill and its associated fiscal impact.

Foreclosure Mediation

Sections 1 to 11 of the amendment extends the sunset date of the Foreclosure Mediation Program from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2014, and results in a cost of $5.2 million in both FY 13 and FY 14 and $1.4 million in FY 15. Since the mediation deadline is 90 days after mediation begins, the cost of the amendment would continue for three months into FY 15. It should be noted that funding of $5.2 million in FY 12 and FY 13 was included in PA 11-6 (the biennial budget) to continue funding for the foreclosure mediation.

The amendment also extends the foreclosure mediation program to owners of properties occupied by religious organizations. This is not expected to result in additional costs to the Judicial Department.

The amendment also make various changes to the foreclosure mediation process that do not result in a fiscal impact.

General-Use Prepaid Cards and Gift Certificates

Sections 9 to 12 of the amendment does not result in a fiscal impact to the state as it concerns the usage of “general-use prepaid card” and “gift certificate” transactions between individuals and private entities.

Registration of Properties in Foreclosure

Sections 13 to 15 of the amendment will result in a State revenue gain estimated to be at least $200, 000 in FY 12 (based on partial year implementation) and $250, 000 in FY 13. It would require payment of the land record filing fee by a person when registering a residential1 property (the title of which has vested through foreclosure) with the municipality in which it is located. Similarly, it would require registration and payment of the same fee by any person commencing an action to foreclose a mortgage on residential property. 2 The land record filing fee is $53, of which $38 is remitted to the State ($36 is deposited to the Community Investment Account3; $2 is deposited to the State Library) .4

A minimal revenue impact to municipalities will result. The amendment: (a) Expands the list of properties in foreclosure that are subject to mandatory registration to include commercial and residential buildings containing one or more dwelling units (under current law mandatory registration is restricted to one-to-four family dwellings) ; (b) removes a requirement that the property be vacant; (c) requires registration when a foreclosure action is commenced; and (d) eliminates the option of registering with the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) instead of the municipality. However, the amount towns collect from registrants is reduced from $100 to $15, the municipal portion of the land record filing fee5. Survey responses from thirteen municipalities indicate that, since 10/1/096, the number of $100 registration fees collected per community has ranged from none to 53. The net revenue impact from the additional registrations and the fee reduction will vary according to each community's experience, but is anticipated to be less than $5, 000.

Additional local revenues would be generated by collection of civil penalties from persons failing to register properties. The amendment specifies penalties of: (1) $100 for a plaintiff in a foreclosure action, up to a maximum of $5, 000, and (2) $250 for a person in whom title to a residential property has vested through a foreclosure action, up to a maximum of $25, 000. Municipalities would be authorized to institute civil actions to collect such penalties.

Reporting of occupied properties subject to foreclosure may result in earlier identification of persons responsible for remediating housing code violations that render housing units unsafe. Local governments may experience savings to the extent that this mitigates the need to provide for tenant's housing or health needs at town expense.

The amendment would also result in additional hearings before the Superior Court. It is anticipated that the number of additional hearings would be minimal, and would not result in additional costs to the Judicial Department.

The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst's professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.


Core-CT Financial Accounting System

1 As defined in the amendment.

2 According to, the number of new foreclosures in Connecticut was 747 in February 2011.

3 This account benefits programming under the Departments of Agriculture and Environmental Protection; the Commission on Culture and Tourism; and the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority.

4 HB 6651 (The General Government Implementer) , which eliminates the sunset of a $10 land record filing fee surcharge on 7/1/11 has passed both the House and Senate, and is pending the Governor's signature.

5 Of this amount: $1 must be used for preservation and management of historic documents; $3 must be deposited to general revenues for capital improvements; and $11 is retained by the town clerk.

6 PA 09-144's effective date.