ELECTIONS--PARTY-DOMINANT DISTRICTS

Topic:
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS; LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS; POLITICAL PARTIES (GENERAL); STATISTICAL INFORMATION; VOTING;
Location:
VOTERS, REGISTRATION OF;


June 17, 2008		2008-R-0365
ELECTIONS--PARTY-DOMINANT DISTRICTS

By: Sandra Norman-Eady, Chief Attorney Meghan Reilly, Legislative Fellow Kristin Sullivan, Associate Analyst

You asked for:

1. a list of party-dominant districts in 2005, the earliest date for which this data is readily available and

2. the percentage of votes received by dominant and non-dominant major party, minor party, and petitioning party candidates in these districts from 1990 to 2006.

As used in the Citizens' Election Program statutes (i.e., CGS § 9-705 (e) and (f)) and this report, “party-dominant districts” mean those districts in which the political party with the most members exceeds the party with the next largest membership by at least 20%.

PARTY-DOMINANT DISTRICTS IN 2005

Using August 2005 data from the Office of the Secretary of the State, we found that nine Senate districts (25%) and 48 House districts (32%) were party-dominant districts. In each instance, the dominant party was one of the two major political parties (i.e., either Democratic or Republican). In fact, the Democratic Party was dominant in all nine Senate districts and 45 of the 48 House districts. The Republican Party was dominant in the remaining three House districts. The party-dominant districts included large cities such as Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven, and Waterbury and small towns such as Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Derby, Hamden, Naugatuck, and Woodbridge. The small towns are all in Senate district 17.

Using the Secretary of the State's Statement of Vote data, we found that the percentage of votes received by candidates in party-dominant districts ranged from 100% in districts where candidates ran unopposed to less than 1% received by petitioning or write-in candidates in contested races. In each contested race, the dominant major party candidate won.

Table 1 shows the highest percentage of votes received by minor party candidate (excluding cross-endorsed candidates) broken down by year and district. Table 2 shows the highest percentage of votes received by petitioning and write-in candidates broken down by year and district. Table 3 shows the total number of votes cast by district, the percentage of votes received by party and candidate status (i.e., petitioning and write-in), and the winning candidate by party in each race. The winning candidates are highlighted.

TABLE 1: HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF VOTES RECEIVED BY MINOR PARTY CANDIDATES

Parties	Percentage of Votes	Districts	*Years*
Green	27.3%	House 93	2004
A Connecticut Party	21.5%	Senate 2	1992
Libertarian	15.9%	House 49	2000
Independent	14.0%	House 73	2004
Reform	12.6%	House 116	2002
Tax the Rich	12.5%	House 93	1992
United Advocacy	10.0%	House 124	1998
Working Families	9.3%	Senate 15	2002
Bristol Independent	4.9%	House 77	1992
Concerned Citizen	3.8%	House 24	2006

TABLE 2: HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF VOTES RECEIVED BY PETITIONING AND WRITE-IN CANDIDATES

Candidate Status	Percentage of Votes	Districts	*Years*
Petitioning	11.0%	House 49	2004
Write-In	9.3%	House 95	2002

TABLE 3: VOTES CAST IN PARTY-DOMINANT DISTRICTS FROM 1990 TO 2006


*Year*	*District*	*Total Votes*	*Percentage of Vote*
*Year*	*District*	*Total Votes*	*Democrat*	*Republican*	*Minor Party*			*Petitioning Party*	*Write-in*

1990	S 1	12,363	100.0%
	S 2	17,437	60.6%	39.4%
	S 3	30,979	68.8%	31.2%
	S 6	14,366	100.0%
	S 10	13,942	95.7%	4.3%
	S 11	18,944	66.8%	24.6%	8.6% (G)
	S 15	29,252	30.9%	69.1%
	S 17	28,270	64.3%	35.7%
	S 23	9,453	62.7%	37.3%
	H 1	4,186	67.9%	32.1%
	H 3	1,975	100.0%
	H4	3,226	100.0%
	H 5	2,723	100.0%
	H 6	1,978	91.2%					8.8%
	H 7	2,643	100.0%
	H 10	5,215	69.4%	30.6%
	H 11	5,676	56.4%	43.6%
	H 15	5,996	100.0%
	H 18	9,698	64.0%	36.0%
	H 24	4,206	70.0%	28.6%	1.3% (LTN)
	H 25	5,068	66.7%	33.3%
	H 26	2,658	100.0%
	H 27	8,299	73.9%	26.1%
	H 33	6,726	54.9%	45.1%
	H 39	3,940	62.6%	37.4%
	H 46	5,716	33.0%	67.0%
	H 49	6,730	71.1%	27.3%				1.6% (PC)
	H 54	3,577	100.0%
	H 72	4,829	56.7%	43.3%
	H 73	7,972	54.5%	45.5%
	H 74	7,548	65.0%	35.0%
	H 75	4,241	67.0%	33.0%
	H 77	6,950	57.4%	42.6%
	H 79	6,528	49.8%	50.2%
	H 84	3,056	58.3%	41.7%
	H 88	8,200	49.0%	51.0%
	H 91	6,606	71.6%	25.9%	2.4% (CC)
	H 92	5,696	80.0%	20.0%
	H 93	3,307	83.6%	16.4%
	H 94	3,189	87.4%	12.6%
	H 95	2,979	84.8%	15.2%
	H 96	4,162	79.2%	20.8%
	H 97	5,900	63.4%	36.6%
	H 104	4,745	100.0%
	H 115	6,772	63.8%	36.1%
	H 116	3,819	100.0%
	H 124	2,199	75.3%	24.7%
	H 125	2,866	60.7%	39.3%
	H 126	4,650	72.4%	27.6%
	H 127	5,639	64.8%	35.2%
	H 128	1,887	57.9%	42.1%
	H 129	4,631	59.3%	40.7%
	H 130	2,045	70.1%	29.9%
	H 140	4,342	63.6%	35.1%	1.3% (I)
	H 141	6,110		100.0%
	H 145	2,611	100.0%
	H 151	4,946		100.0%
1992	S 1	23,119	57.4%*	27.6%	15.0%* (ACP)
	S 2	25,764	61.3%	17.2%	21.5% (ACP)
	S 3	37,714	70.6%	29.4%
	S 6	29,346	48.8%*	34.9%	16.3%* (ACP)
	S 10	21,549	73.0%	27.0%
	S 11	28,637	58.2%*	27.9%	12.2%* (ACP)	1.7% (TTR)
	S 15	34,013	38.4%	61.6%
	S 17	39,434	42.8%*	44.6%	12.7%* (ACP)
	S 23	17,833	53.2%	34.0%	12.8% (ACP)
	H 1	4,973	80.5%*		19.5%* (ACP)
	H 3	3,072	82.0%*		18.0%* (ACP)
	H4	3,728	70.7%*	15.8%	13.5%* (ACP)
	H 5	3,418	80.0%		20.0%* (ACP)
	H 6	5,966	80.7%	19.3%
	H 7	4,950	82.2%*		17.8%* (ACP)
	H 10	8,802	40.7%*	45.5%	13.8%* (ACP)
	H 11	7,820	45.9%*	35.5%	18.6%* (ACP)
	H 15	10,507	49.4%	40.4%	10.3%* (ACP)
	H 18	12,215	46.6%*	37.2%	16.2%* (ACP)
	H 24	4,613	55.8%*	29.8%	14.4%* (ACP)
	H 25	7,322	43.1%*	40.9%	16.0%* (ACP)
	H 26	6,329	53.1%*	27.9%	14.3%* (ACP)	4.7% (L)
	H 27	10,990	54.6%	34.8%	10.6% (ACP)
	H 33	8,249	61.3%	26.8%*	11.9%* (ACP)
	H 39	4,939	47.1%*	32.8%	20.1%* (ACP)
	H 46	8,041	39.1%	54.5%	6.4% (ACP)
	H 49	8,365	44.6%*	33.4%	18.4%* (ACP)	1.1% (I)		2.5%
	H 54	6,986	49.6%*	30.1%	20.3%* (ACP)
	H 72	5,116	42.5%*	41.6%	15.9%* (ACP)
	H 73	9,094	64.2%	34.6%				1.3%
	H 74	8,652	50.4%	49.6%
	H 75	4,832	73.7%	26.3%
	H 77	9,473	29.4%*	51.0%	14.7%* (ACP)	4.9% (BI)
	H 79	8,392	36.1%*	45.9%	18.0%* (ACP)
	H 84	6,183	55.2%	37.5%				7.4%
	H 88	9,863	43.2%*	43.8%	13.1%* (ACP)
	H 91	8,240	61.0%	39.0%
	H 92	7,018	68.4%*	20.0%	11.6%* (ACP)
	H 93	4,406	69.2%	18.3%	12.5% (TTR)
	H 94	4,715	80.0%*	10.8%	9.1%* (ACP)
	H 95	3,736	84.7%	15.3%
	H 96	5,653	64.3%*	18.5%	10.6%* (ACP)	6.5% (TTR)
	H 97	7,246	43.4%	56.6%
	H 104	8,470	67.7%	32.3%
	H 115	8,126	64.4%	35.6%
	H 116	7,192	53.6%	46.4%
	H 124	4,402	62.5%	27.2%	10.2% (ACP)
	H 125	5,589	57.0%	35.9%	7.2% (ACP)
	H 126	5,994	68.3%	22.7%	9.0% (ACP)
	H 127	9,534	68.9%	31.1%
	H 128	2,546	68.9%	30.3%				0.8%
	H 129	6,057	60.2%	39.8%
	H 130	3,031	65.0%*	24.2%	10.8%* (ACP)
	H 140	5,948	50.4%*	34.6%	15.0%* (ACP)
	H 141	12,562	27.1%*	57.9%	15.0%* (ACP)
	H 145	3,963	75.9%	24.1%
	H 151	10,645	35.0%	65.0%
1994	S 1	9,423	100.0%
	S 2	14,910	68.2%*		28.0%* (ACP)			3.8%
	S 3	31,784	36.2%*	50.1%	13.6%* (ACP)
	S 6	22,869	53.1%	39.3%	6.6% (ACP)	1.0% (I)
	S 10	13,599	77.9%	22.1%
	S 11	18,634	75.7%	24.3%
	S 15	27,827	25.3%*	67.1%	7.6%* (ACP)
	S 17	31,439	40.5%*	42.4%	17.1%* (ACP)
	S 23	9,833	66.3%	33.7%
	H 1	3,967	59.4%*	21.7%	18.9%* (ACP)
	H 3	1,561	72.4%*	14.7%	12.9%* (ACP)
	H4	1,505	85.0%*		15.0%* (ACP)
	H 5	1,457	100.0%
	H 6	2,944	78.9%**	21.1%**		** (Same candidate was endorsed by both the Democratic and Republican party)
	H 7	3,693	75.1%*		24.9%*
	H 10	6,680	45.0%*	31.5%	23.5%* (ACP)
	H 11	2,993	100.0%
	H 15	8,435	44.3%*	30.4%	25.3%* (ACP)
	H 18	9,872	54.4%	25.5%*	17.2%* (ACP)
	H 24	3,294	52.8%*	27.9%	19.3%* (ACP)
	H 25	5,691	63.0%	37.0%
	H 26	5,297	47.4%	37.4%*	14.2%* (ACP)	1.1% (I)
	H 27	9,658	40.0%	60.0%		ACP cross-endorsed the Democratic nominee; vote for candidate were shown in D column only on statement of vote.
	H 33	6,141	49.8%*	32.7%	17.6%* (ACP)
	H 39	3,552	38.0%*	42.6%	19.4%* (ACP)
	H 46	6,655	34.7%	65.3%		ACP cross-endorsed the Republican nominee; votes for candidate were shown in R column only on statement of vote.
	H 49	6,400	50.9%*	21.6%*	26.4%* (ACP)	1.2%* (I)
	H 54	4,990	54.9%*	23.0%	22.1%* (ACP)
	H 72	3,896	45.9%*	36.9%	17.2%* (ACP)
	H 73	7,567	60.9%	39.1%
	H 74	6,807	66.6%	33.4%
	H 75	3,503	66.1%	34.0%
	H 77	7,798	38.1%*	44.7%	17.2%* (ACP)
	H 79	5,814	50.9%	49.1%
	H 84	4,339	44.2%*	36.6%	17.4%* (ACP)	1.6% (L)
	H 88	8,194	43.4%*	41.1%	15.4%* (ACP)
	H 91	6,369	51.1%*	31.2%	17.7%* (ACP)
	H 92	4,150	83.0%*		17.0%* (ACP)
	H 93	2,558	70.7%*	9.4%	12.0%* (ACP)	7.9% (TTR)
	H 94	2,546	87.1%*		12.9%* (ACP)
	H 95	2,340	87.0%	13.0%
	H 96	3,370	79.1%	15.2%*	5.7%* (ACP)
	H 97	5,986	38.6%	45.3%*	12.1%* (ACP)
	H 104	6,323	62.7%	37.3%
	H 115	6,004	67.8%	32.2%
	H 116	5,042	54.6%	45.4%
	H 124	2,411	69.7%	30.3%
	H 125	4,222	57.6%*	32.7%	9.7%* (ACP)
	H 126	4,137	62.2%*	25.1%	12.7%* (ACP)
	H 127	6,863	58.6%	40.5%	0.9% (I)
	H 128	1,478	68.1%	31.9%
	H 129	4,463	46.4%*	43.8%	9.8%* (ACP)
	H 130	1,579	69.0%*	22.1%	8.9%* (ACP)
	H 140	3,681	50.1%*	37.2%	12.7%* (ACP)
	H 141	6,452		100.0%
	H 145	1,640	100.0%
	H 151	7,341	29.0%	71.0%
1996	S 1	18,641	80.6%	19.4%
	S 2	17,928	100.0%
	S 3	36,276	53.6%	46.4%					.02%
	S 6	20,107	92.6%		7.4% (I)
	S 10	19,316	81.3%	18.7%
	S 11	19,774	100.0%
	S 15	30,311	38.5%	61.5%
	S 17	38,612	50.5%*	46.0%	3.5%* (ACP)
	S 23	14,614	77.1%	22.9%
	H 1	4,419	100.0%
	H 3	2,705	85.6%	13.8%				0.6%
	H4	2,061	100.0%
	H 5	2,684	89.2%					10.8%
	H 6	4,054	83.9%**	16.1%**
	H 7	4,656	100.0%
	H 10	7,481	71.7%	28.3%
	H 11	5,961	75.0%	23.3%				1.7%
	H 15	7,260	100.0%
	H 18	10,831	68.8%	31.2%
	H 24	4,096	72.4%	22.5%	5.1% (I)
	H 25	6,428	69.3%	30.7%
	H 26	5,826	43.1%	56.9%
	H 27	10,092	43.3%	56.7%
	H 33	7,453	73.4%	26.6%
	H 39	4,385	65.8%	26.1%*	8.1%* (ACP)
	H 46	7,223	44.9%	46.2%*	8.9%* (ACP)
	H 49	6,981	74.5%	23.7%*	1.8%* (I)
	H 54	4,748	100.0%
	H 72	4,263	75.8%	24.2%
	H 73	8,296	67.8%	32.2%
	H 74	7,517	65.4%	34.6%
	H 75	3,457	89.5%					10.5%
	H 77	8,928	62.7%	37.3%
	H 79	7,541	64.6%	35.4%
	H 84	5,123	75.7%	24.3%
	H 88	6,859	100.0%
	H 91	5,710	100.0%
	H 92	5,493	84.5%	15.5%
	H 93	3,500	100.0%
	H 94	3,801	100.0%
	H 95	3,516	90.4%	9.6%
	H 96	4,531	85.9%	14.1%
	H 97	3,171		100.0%
	H 104	7,326	73.5%	26.5%
	H 115	7,232	72.9%	25.9%				1.2%
	H 116	6,195	64.9%	35.1%
	H 124	3,071	82.2%	17.8%
	H 125	5,102	78.6%	21.4%
	H 126	5,220	83.2%	16.8%
	H 127	8,106	70.2%	29.8%
	H 128	2,346	84.1%	15.9%
	H 129	5,366	67.6%	32.4%
	H 130	2,462	87.3%	10.8%				1.9%
	H 140	5,360	63.4%	36.6%
	H 141	8,329		100.0%
	H 145	10,052	35.1%	64.9%
	H 151	9,925	28.0%	72.0%
1998	S 1	9,650	100.0%
	S 2	13,689	100.0%
	S 3	27,479	64.8%	35.2%
	S 6	14,052	94.3%		5.7% (I)
	S 10	12,997	79.5%	20.5%
	S 11	13,992	100.0%
	S 15	23,557	25.1%	74.9%
	S 17	28,956	62.4%	37.6%
	S 23	10,327	79.0%	21.0%
	H 1	3,353	100.0%
	H 3	1,291	100.0%
	H4	1,485	88.1%		11.9% (I)
	H 5	1,485	100.0%
	H 6	2,933	76.1%	23.9%
	H 7	3,427	100.0%
	H 10	5,435	76.2%	23.8%
	H 11	4,375	76.5%	22.1%	13.3% (LTN)
	H 15	5,535	100.0%
	H 18	6,648	63.5%	36.5%
	H 24	2,611	77.3%	22.7%
	H 25	3,270	100.0%
	H 26	2,301		100.0%
	H 27	8,092	57.5%	42.5%
	H 33	5,351	72.4%	26.0%				1.6%
	H 39	2,922	72.2%	25.9%				1.8%
	H 46	5,164	36.4%	63.6%
	H 49	5,489	57.8%	40.9%*	1.3%* (I)
	H 54	3,384	100.0%
	H 72	3,660	63.0%	37.0%
	H 73	6,469	64.3%	35.7%
	H 74	5,652	71.4%	28.6%
	H 75	3,030	58.8%	37.0%				4.2%
	H 77	6,940	65.4%	34.6%
	H 79	5,239	67.8%	32.2%
	H 84	3,580	75.6%	24.4%
	H 88	7,057	68.0%	32.0%
	H 91	5,398	73.4%	26.6%
	H 92	4,395	86.9%	13.1%
	H 93	2,587	88.8%	11.2%
	H 94	2,603	100.0%
	H 95	1,996	100.0%
	H 96	2,619	85.0%	15.0%
	H 97	2,369		100.0%
	H 104	4,176	100.0%
	H 115	5,292	71.9%	28.1%
	H 116	4,518	66.9%	33.1%
	H 124	2,589	73.2%	16.8%	10.0% (UA)
	H 125	4,005	77.6%	22.4%
	H 126	4,193	88.2%	11.8%
	H 127	5,950	64.4%	35.6%
	H 128	1,652	80.1%	19.9%
	H 129	4,091	72.7%	27.3%
	H 130	2,091	87.8%	12.2%
	H 140	3,350	65.6%	34.4%
	H 141	7,418	32.4%	67.6%
	H 145	2,194	100.0%
	H 151	5,253		100.0%
2000	S 1	15,282	89.3%		10.7% (G)
	S 2	18,320	100.0%
	S 3	35,985	60.3%	39.7%
	S 6	25,053	68.2%	30.5%	1.3% (I)
	S 10	20,391	85.6%	14.4%
	S 11	25,901	81.9%	18.1%
	S 15	30,152	63.6%	36.4%
	S 17	38,749	70.4%	29.6%
	S 23	14,783	81.1%	18.9%
	H 1	4,575	100.0%
	H 3	2,201	100.0%
	H4	2,051	100.0%
	H 5	2,159	100.0%
	H 6	3,478	100.0%
	H 7	4,829	100.0%
	H 10	7,100	74.7%	25.3%
	H 11	5,846	66.5%	31.9%	1.5% (LTN)
	H 15	7,575	100.0%
	H 18	10,872	77.1%	22.9%
	H 24	2,717	100.0%
	H 25	4,524	100.0%
	H 26	2,360		100.0%
	H 27	10,081	76.8%	23.2%
	H 33	5,662	94.1%		5.9% (LTN)
	H 39	3,529	91.3%		8.7% (LTN)
	H 46	6,704	54.1%	45.0%	0.9% (LTN)
	H 49	5,652	79.4%		15.9% (LTN)	4.7% (I)
	H 54	4,506	100.0%
	H 72	4,236	79.4%	20.6%
	H 73	7,261	60.7%	39.3%
	H 74	5,127	100.0%
	H 75	3,603	76.0%	24.0%
	H 77	8,673	73.9%	26.1%
	H 79	7,095	69.8%	30.2%
	H 84	5,049	74.3%	23.8%	1.8% (LTN)
	H 88	7,235	100.0%
	H 91	6,252	100.0%
	H 92	6,125	84.6%	11.3%	4.1% (G)
	H 93	4,086	91.5%	8.5%
	H 94	3,957	90.6%	9.4%
	H 95	5,012	90.0%	10.0%
	H 96	3,947	100.0%
	H 97	6,241	53.2%	46.8%
	H 104	7,445	75.9%	24.1%
	H 115	6,986	77.7%	22.3%
	H 116	5,951	73.9%	26.1%
	H 124	3,463	85.5%	14.5%
	H 125	5,240	79.7%	20.3%
	H 126	5,317	86.3%	13.7%
	H 127	8,055	73.4%	26.6%
	H 128	2,437	86.3%	13.7%
	H 129	5,332	75.6%	24.4%
	H 130	2,535	83.7%	16.3%
	H 140	5,312	76.0%	24.0%
	H 141	11,076	25.5%	74.5%
	H 145	4,312	75.4%	24.6%
	H 151	7,328		100.0%
2002	S 1	14,982	70.9%	23.3%	5.8% (G)
	S 2	19,217	77.1%	22.9%
	S 3	27,788	58.8%	41.2%
	S 6	22,827	54.1%	45.9%
	S 10	12,286	100.0%
	S 11	19,757	76.0%	24.0%
	S 15	13,748	90.7%		9.3% (WF)
	S 17	17,142	100.0%
	S 23	9,654	75.2%	22.2%	2.6% (WF)
	H 1	3,950	100.0%
	H 3	1,917	100.0%
	H4	1,152	87.9%	12.1%
	H 5	2,263	91.0%	9.0%
	H 6	3,329	80.4%	19.6%
	H 7	2,927	92.2%	7.8%
	H 10	5,273	70.6%	27.5%	1.09% (WF)
	H 11	4,670	61.9%	38.1%
	H 15	8,223	71.1%	28.9%
	H 18	8,440	74.1%	25.9%
	H 24	5,386	67.9%	32.1%
	H 25	2,910	69.7%	30.3%
	H 26	4,935	46.0%	54.0%
	H 27	8,546	75.0%	25.0%
	H 33	5,775	57.4%	36.3%	2.2% (LTN)			4.2%
	H 39	3,524	62.9%	33.4%	3.8% (WF)
	H 46	3,540	100.0%
	H 49	5,078	64.1%	35.9%
	H 54	5,145	76.9%	23.1%
	H 72	3,330	72.6%	27.4%
	H 73	5,745	62.3%	37.7%
	H 74	5,462	35.8%	64.2%
	H 75	2,643	71.4%	28.6%
	H 77	6,877	72.8%	27.2%
	H 79	5,259	68.1%	31.9%
	H 84	3,485	75.4%	24.6%
	H 88	4,368	100.0%
	H 91	4,746	81.6%		18.4% (G)
	H 92	3,826	100.0%
	H 93	2,389	100.0%
	H 94	2,662	100.0%
	H 95	2,804	78.2%	12.4%					9.3%
	H 96	5,253	74.2%	25.8%
	H 97	2,946	100.0%
	H 104	4,471	66.6%	33.4%
	H 115	3,889	99.9%						>.01%
	H 116	3,283	87.4%		12.6% (REF)
	H 124	2,875	72.8%	24.5%	2.7% (WF)
	H 125	5,705	96.6%					3.4%
	H 126	3,856	84.4%	15.6%
	H 127	4,083	77.0%	23.0%
	H 128	1,468	82.6%	14.9%	2.5% (WF)
	H 129	3,592	57.9%	42.1%
	H 130	2,009	78.4%	18.4%	3.2% (WF)
	H 140	3,255	55.9%	33.9%				10.3%
	H 141	7,717	23.3%	76.7%
	H 145	2,290	100.0%
	H 151	4,792	100.0%
2004	S 1	18,042	85.7%		3.0% (WF)	11.4% (G)
	S 2	24,029	94.3%
	S 3	37,645	66.7%	30.9%	2.4% (WF)
	S 6	21,209	95.4%		4.6% (WF)
	S 10	21,496	100.0%
	S 11	23,364	100.0%
	S 15	18,892	90.3%		9.7% (I)
	S 17	26,018	94.4%		5.6% (WF)
	S 23	19,137	73.3%*	23.6%	3.1%* (WF)
	H 1	5,625	100.0%
	H 3	3,057	94.7%		5.3% (WF)
	H4	2,785	85.8%	14.2%
	H 5	3,665	97.4%		2.6% (LTN)
	H 6	5,076	80.3%	17.5%	2.2% (WF)
	H 7	4,210	100.0%
	H 10	7,336	74.5%	23.7%	1.8% (WF)
	H 11	6,340	71.5%	28.5%
	H 15	11,060	75.4%	24.6%
	H 18	8,421	100.0%
	H 24	7,173	74.6%	23.5%	1.9% (CC)
	H 25	3,206	100.0%
	H 26	4,773	100.0%
	H 27	9,105	94.9%		5.1% (WF)
	H 33	8,593	66.8%	28.4%	3.0% (WF)	1.8% (LTN)
	H 39	5,369	66.9%*	29.1%	4.0%* (WF)
	H 46	5,849	93.2%					6.8%
	H 49	5,779	81.3%		7.7% (WF)			11.0%
	H 54	6,679	94.5%		5.5% (WF)
	H 72	3,775	84.2%		8.5% (I)			3.5%
	H 73	5,573	82.1%		14.0% (I)	3.9% (WF)
	H 74	7,292	37.5%	60.0%	2.5% (I)
	H 75	3,904	64.4%	25.9%	1.7% (CC)	5.2% (I)	2.7% (WF)
	H 77	9,480	64.2%	35.8%
	H 79	5,495	100.0%
	H 84	3,663	100.0%
	H 88	7,019	95.7%		4.3% (WF)
	H 91	8,406	80.7%	19.3%
	H 92	6,530	96.3%		3.7% (WF)
	H 93	5,151	72.7%		27.3% (G)
	H 94	4,965	100.0%
	H 95	3,762	100.0%
	H 96	8,276	80.0%	20.0%
	H 97	4,541	100.0%
	H 104	8,125	52.1%	47.9%
	H 115	6,418	95.9%		4.1% (WF)
	H 116	5,301	89.4%		6.6% (REF)	4.0% (WF)
	H 124	5,907	80.7%*	16.7%	2.6%* (WF)
	H 125	8,433		100.0%
	H 126	7,168	83.2%	15.6%	1.2% (WF)
	H 127	6,732	63.0%	35.2%	1.8% (WF)
	H 128	3,360	80.1%	17.6%	2.2% (WF)
	H 129	6,139	74.8%	23.9%	1.3% (WF)
	H 130	4,003	79.0%*	17.9%	3.0%* (WF)
	H 140	5,565	74.8%	25.2%
	H 141	12,443	41.8%	58.2%
	H 145	3,663	100.0%
	H 151	6,885		100.0%
2006	S 1	12,417	87.8%*		6.3% (WF)	5.9%* (G)
	S 2	19,677	79.4%*	15.2%	5.4%* (WF)
	S 3	28,645	69.9%*	28.2%	2.0%* (WF)
	S 6	16,127	92.8%*		7.2%* (WF)
	S 10	13,086	85.9%	14.1%
	S 11	18,003	100.0%
	S 15	13,514	88.2%		11.8% (I)
	S 17	25,446	72.2%*	22.7%	5.1%* (WF)
	S 23	10,131	82.2%*	13.1%	4.7%* (WF)
	H 1	3,781	100.0%
	H 3	1,814	92.0%*		8.0%* (WF)
	H4	1,254	100.0%
	H 5	2,031	96.2%		3.8% (LTN)
	H 6	2,561	94.1%*		5.9%* (WF)
	H 7	2,728	93.5%	6.5%
	H 10	5,087	74.0%*	24.4%	1.6%* (WF)
	H 11	4,595	73.6%	26.4%
	H 15	7,203	95.5%		4.5% (WF)
	H 18	8,557	74.5%	25.6%
	H 24	5,015	75.1%	21.1%	3.8% (CC)
	H 25	2,599	78.1%	21.9%
	H 26	4,282	80.0%	20.0%
	H 27	8,221	93.5%*		6.5%* (WF)
	H 33	6,496	64.2%*	31.6%	4.2%* (WF)
	H 39	3,712	65.5%*	29.1%	5.4%* (WF)
	H 46	3,868	100.0%
	H 49	5,443	54.4%*	38.1%	4.3%* (WF)	1.4% (CC)		1.8%
	H 54	5,595	93.3%*		1.3%* (WF)				>.1%
	H 72	2,863	56.3%*	22.7%	6.6%* (WF)	12.1% (I)		2.2%
	H 73	4,102	85.3%		7.8%* (WF)	6.9%* (I)
	H 74	3,913	93.9%		6.1% (I)
	H 75	2,121	58.1%	31.7%*	6.8%* (I)	1.9% (WF)	1.4% (CC)
	H 77	7,649	49.1%	50.9%
	H 79	5,882	67.7%	32.3%
	H 84	2,622	100.0%
	H 88	4,727	94.9%*		5.1%* (WF)
	H 91	4,884	100.0%
	H 92	4,724	84.8%*	10.0%	5.2%* (WF)
	H 93	2,514	100.0%
	H 94	3,540	100.0%
	H 95	2,057	100.0%
	H 96	5,136	100.0%
	H 97	3,937	73.4%	26.6%
	H 104	5,854	56.6%	43.4%
	H 115	5,646	69.8%*	22.6%	7.6%* (WF)
	H 116	3,962	69.5%*	14.6%	7.3%* (WF)			8.6%
	H 124	2,774	83.0%*	11.9%	5.1%* (WF)
	H 125	6,185		100.0%
	H 126	4,376	79.7%*	15.5%	4.8%* (WF)
	H 127	3,278	93.9%*		6.1%* (WF)
	H 128	1,506	85.9%*	10.4%	3.8%* (WF)
	H 129	2,695	93.1%*		6.9%* (WF)
	H 130	1,986	82.2%*	12.9%	4.9%* (WF)
	H 140	3,358	71.0%	27.8%				1.2%
	H 141	6,270		100.0%
	H 145	2,431	100.0%
	H 151	7,634	49.1%	50.9%

Ref = Reform G = Green TTR =Tax the Rich BI = Bristol Independent LTN = Libertarian

I = Independent WF = Working Families ACP = A Connecticut Party CC= Concerned Citizens UA = United Advocacy

*Cross-endorsed candidates

SNE:tjo