Coordination of Adult Literacy Programs Final Report
Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee
December 2006
APPENDIX A
• Connecticut Community Colleges
• State Department of Education
• Connecticut Employment and Training Commission
• State Department of Labor
Appendix B. Adult Literacy Acronyms and Definitions
ABE |
Adult Basic Education |
AEFLA |
Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (Title II, P.L. 105-220) |
AHSCDP |
Adult High School Credit Diploma Program |
ASE |
Adult Secondary Education |
ATDN |
Connecticut Adult Training and Development Network |
CAACE |
Connecticut Association for Adult and Continuing Education |
CASAS |
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System |
CARS |
Connecticut Adult Reporting System |
CCS |
Connecticut Competency System |
CETC |
Connecticut Employment and Training Commission |
CREC |
Capital Region Education Council |
DOL |
Connecticut Department of Labor |
DSS |
Connecticut Department of Social Services |
EDP |
External Diploma Program |
ESEA |
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (P.L. 103-382) |
ESL |
English as a Second Language |
GED |
General Educational Development test |
JFES |
Jobs First Employment Services |
LEP |
Limited English Proficiency |
LV |
Literacy Volunteers |
NAAL |
National Assessment of Adult Literacy (2003) |
NGA |
National Governors Association |
NIFL |
National Institute for Literacy |
NRS |
National Reporting System for Adult Education |
NSAL |
National Survey of Adult Literacy (1992) |
OVAE |
Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education |
OWC |
Connecticut Office of Workforce Competitiveness |
RESC |
Regional Education Service Center |
SDE |
Connecticut State Department of Education |
TANF |
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families |
TFA |
Temporary Family Assistance |
U.S. DOE |
U.S. Department of Education |
U.S. DOL |
U.S. Department of Labor |
WIA |
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-220) |
WIB |
Workforce Investment Board |
Appendix C. State And Federal Adult Literacy Laws: Major Provisions
Connecticut State Statutes
In Connecticut, all school districts are statutorily required to offer adult education instruction to eligible residents that includes: Americanization and United States citizenship; English for adults with limited English proficiency; and elementary and secondary school completion programs and classes. Districts may provide adult education classes on any subject and vocational education area included in their elementary and secondary school curriuculum as well as adult literacy, parenting skills, and any other subject or activity.
Credit requirements. Districts may award adult education diplomas to students who have satisfactorily completed a minimum of 20 adult education credits in certain academic and elective areas. As of July 1, 2004, the credit requirements by statute are: four credits in English; three credits in mathematics; three credits in social studies including one credit in American history and at least one-half credit in civics and American government; two credits in science; and one credit in the arts or vocational education. State law specifically allows adult education credits to be awarded for the following:
• experiential learning (e.g., military experience, occupational experience including training, community service, or avocational skills);
• successful completion of course work at state-accredited higher education institutions and approved public and private high schools and vocational-technical schools;
• satisfactory performance on subject matter tests; and
• independent study projects.
District authority. Each school district must determine the minimum number of weeks per semester for an adult education program. The district is further required to provide certified counseling staff to assist adult education program students with educational and career counseling. Local and regional boards of education providing adult education classes and activities are required to provide rooms and other facilities and employ necessary personnel. The boards have the same powers and duties in relation to adult education classes as with other public schools.
Students. Adult students may be admitted to any public elementary or secondary school to attend adult education classes. Persons enrolled in a full-time educational program in a local or regional school district must obtain the approval of the school district principal to enroll in an adult education activity.
An adult resident is statutorily defined as: (1) any person 16 years or older who in not enrolled in a public school program; (2) a student expelled from a public school for seriously disruptive conduct involving the use of alcohol and subsequently assigned to an adult class; or (3) a public school student who is under 16 and a mother and requests permission from the local or regional board of education to attend adult education classes.
Adult education providers. All local and regional boards of education are required to establish and maintain adult classes or provide through cooperative arrangements with other boards of education, cooperating eligible entities, or regional educational service centers for participation in adult classes for adult residents. A cooperating eligible entity is defined by statute as any corporation or other business entity, nonprofit organization, private occupational school, licensed or accredited institution of higher education, regional vocational-technical school, or library that enters into a written cooperative arrangements with a local or regional board of education or regional educational service center to provides adult education classes or services.
Regional educational service centers (RESCs) are education agencies formed by four or more local or regional boards of education in a state regional planning area to cooperatively provide services and programs. 1 RESCs often provide special education services, while some operate inter-district magnet schools and adult education programs for their member districts.
Fees and charges. Required adult education classes and programs in Americanization and United State citizenship, ESL, and elementary and secondary school completion programs must be provided free of charge to eligible adults. However, a providing school district can charge a registration fee to a cooperating district for that district's residents registered for required adult education classes. Further, adult students may be charged registration fees for nonrequired classes; for these classes, providing school districts may charge a higher registration fee for residents of a cooperating school district than it does for its own residents.
A board of education for any providing school district may also set and collect student fees for books and materials or require a refundable deposit for the lending of books and materials for an adult education classes, activities, or programs. Fees may be waived for a handicapped adult or elderly person (at least 62 years) enrolled in adult education classes, activities, and programs in any subject provided by the elementary or secondary school including vocational education, adult literacy, parenting skills, and any other subject or activity. A board of education providing adult education may establish and maintain an adult education school activity fund to handle the finances of the program.
State grants. To be eligible for reimbursement through a state grant, school districts and RESCs are required to annually submit an adult education proposal to the Department of Education. SDE determines the format of the proposal, including a description of the program and an estimate of the eligible costs for the upcoming fiscal year. Local and regional school districts and RESCs are reimbursed a percentage of their eligible adult education expenses based on a statutory formula.
Eligible expenditures for adult education are broadly defined in statute as those directly attributable to the required adult education program including teachers and teacher aides, administration, clerical assistance, program supplies, facility rentals other than rooms and facilities specifically for adult education classes and activities, staff development, counselors, transportation, security, and child care services.
The percentage of eligible costs for adult education is determined based on a ranking for all towns in a descending order from 1 to 169. All towns are ranked based on their adjusted equalized net grand list per capita. A reimbursement percentage on a continuous scale of 0 to 65 is determined for each town. Priority school districts have a guaranteed floor (not less than 20 percent) built into their reimbursement formula and large schools and those providing basic adult education to Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services clients are given inceases up to a certain ceiling.
Federal Law
Federal legislation concerning adult literacy was first enacted in the mid-1960s as part of the national anti-poverty programs initiated during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Recognizing the link between economic success, effective community participation, and an individual's literacy level, Congress created a grant program to support state adult basic education activities under P.L. 88-452, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. The current federal adult literacy law, The Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA), was enacted as Title II of The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), Public Law 105-220.
Purpose. The main purposes of AEFLA, according to Section 202 of P.L. 105-220, Title II, are to: “…
• assist adults to become literate and obtain the knowledge and skills necessary for employment and self-sufficiency;
• assist adults who are parents to obtain the educational skills necessary to become full partners in the educational development of their children; and
• assist adults in the completion of a secondary school education.”
Under AEFLA, “literate” means an individual is able to read, write, and speak in English, compute, and solve problems, at levels of proficiency necessary to function on the job, in his or her family, and in society. The federal definition does not establish any specific educational competency level or single, national literacy standard for adults.
Funding. Federal AEFLA funds are distributed to states according to a formula based on census data on the number of adults age 16 and over who lack a high school diploma and are not enrolled in school. In FY 05, all state Adult Education and Family Literacy Act grant awards totaled nearly $560 million and Connecticut received almost $5.8 million
A 25 percent state match (state and local monies combined) is required and states must also sustain their overall level of spending (maintenance of effort) on adult literacy services. The maintenance of effort requirement applies to aggregate and per-pupil spending and states can face reduced funding allocations for noncompliance.
Most states exceed the 25 percent matching level and Connecticut's state-local contribution typically is among the highest in the country. In FY 02, Connecticut's nonfederal share of total spending on adult education and literacy was 85 percent.
States must award at least 82.5 percent of the federal grant on a competitive basis to local providers of adult education and literacy services. The federal law prohibits states from using more than 10 percent of their AEFLA funding for the education of correctional facility or other institutionalized populations.
The local provider network may include local education agencies (LEAs)/school districts, community colleges, and a variety of community- and faith-based organizations and nonprofit agencies that provide literacy services. In awarding local funding, states must consider 12 statutory criteria that include factors such as: past effectiveness, commitment to serving those most in need, measurable goals, program intensity and duration, high-quality management information, flexible schedules, support services, and coordination with other available community resources.
States are allowed to establish additional criteria and set funding priority areas for their program activities. Currently, Connecticut has identified six federal funding priority areas that include, among others, projects related to workforce preparedness, programs to improve family (parent and child) literacy, and services that promote the transition from adult education to post-secondary education and training.
The state administrative agency can retain up to 17.5 percent of the federal grant, with a maximum of 5 percent for administration and 12.5 percent for leadership activities, which are statewide program improvements such as professional development and technical assistance. In Connecticut, the State Department of Education (SDE) is the agency authorized to administer AEFLA. As the administering and supervising entity, SDE must prepare a state five-year plan for providing adult education and literacy services, monitor and report on program performance, distribute funds to local providers and provide statewide leadership.
Activities. Providers must use federal AEFLA funds to operate programs that provide services or instruction in one or more of the following categories:
• Adult education and literacy services, including workplace literacy services;
• Family literacy services; and
• English literacy services.
Under the federal law, adult education is defined as instruction below the postsecondary level for persons age 16 or older and not enrolled in secondary school who do not have a high school diploma or equivalent level of educational skills, or competency in reading, writing, or speaking English. Workplace literacy services are basic skill and ESL instructional activities offered with the purpose of improving worker productivity through improved English literacy skills. Family literacy programs integrate parent and child literacy activities including early childhood and adult education programs, parent training, and interactive literacy activities between parents and their children.
In addition to literacy programs, local providers may, and many do, offer a variety of related support services such as job placement, child care, and transportation assistance. However, such activities are usually funded from sources other than AEFLA grant money.
Performance standards and reporting. Improving accountability for the results of publicly funded employment, training, and literacy programs was a central goal of the 1998 federal workforce investment reform legislation. Under the provisions of AEFLA, there are three core indicators for assessing state performance of adult literacy activities on an annual basis:
• demonstrated improvements in literacy skill levels;
• placement or retention in, or completion of, postsecondary education, training, unsubsidized employment or career advancement; and
• receipt of a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent.
The federal adult education law required the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE), to create a National Reporting System (NRS) on outcomes from state adult education and literacy activities. The reporting system developed by OVAE, which became effective in July 2000, establishes five core measures for assessing the AEFLA performance indicators as well as standardized definitions and data collection methodologies states must use to ensure comparable and reliable information. (The core NRS measures, their working definitions, and the assessement method and reporting process used in Connecticut are described in Appendix D).
Each year, states must negotiate targeted levels of performance for each NRS measure and report progress toward their goals to the U.S. DOE. States that meet or exceed their adult literacy activity goals as well as their performance goals for other WIA-funded employment and training programs can qualify for federal incentive grant funding.
Table 1. WIA Employment and Training Program Performance Measures | ||||
WIA Title I Programs | ||||
Measure |
Adult |
Dislocated Worker |
Youth Age 19-21 |
Youth Age 14-18 |
Entered Employment Rate |
• |
• |
• |
|
Employment Retention Rate at 6 Months |
• |
• |
• |
|
Average Earnings Change in 6 Months |
• |
• |
||
Earnings Replacement Rate in 6 Months |
• |
|||
Entered Employment and Credential Rate* |
• |
• |
||
Employment/Education/Training and Credential Rate* |
• |
|||
Customer Satisfaction for Participants |
• |
• |
• |
• |
Customer Satisfaction for Employers |
• |
• |
• |
• |
Skill Attainment Rate |
• | |||
Diploma or Equivalent Attainment rate |
• | |||
Placement and Retention Rate |
• | |||
*Credentials includes a high school diploma, GED, postsecondary degree or certificate, professional license/certificate Source of Data : GAO Report 04-657 (WIA: State and Local Areas Hve Developed Strategies to Assess Performance but Labor Could Do More to Help, June 2004). |
The federal core indicators for WIA Title I employment and training programs that serve adults, youth, and dislocated workers are listed in Table 1. For the most part, they focus on employment rates, credential rates, and changes in the earnings of individual participants. The indicators regarding skill attainment and high school completion, which are comparable to AEFLA core measures, were recently added for the WIA programs that serve youth age 14-18.
Required coordination. Another central goal of the 1998 WIA reforms was to integrate workforce development services through a system of community-based “one-stop” career centers. The centers were intended to give jobseekers and employers in a local labor market area access to many employment, training, and education resources at one site.
To promote collaboration and coordination, WIA requires certain federal programs, including those funded under the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, to be mandatory “one-stop” system partners (see Table 2). By law, mandatory partners are required to: make their core services available at the one-stop centers; use portion of their funding to support the one-stop system; provide representation on the local workforce investment board; and enter into formal agreements (written memoranda of understanding, MOUs) with the local boards concerning these activities.
Table 2. Mandatory WIA One-Stop System Partners | |
Program |
Federal Agency |
• Adult Education and Literacy (WIA Title II) • Vocational Education (Perkins Act) • Vocational Rehabilitation |
Dept. of Education |
• Employment and Training for Adults, Dislocated Workers, and Youth (WIA Title I) • Employment and training for migrants and seasonal farm workers • Employment and training for Native Americans • Job Corps • Older American Community Service Employment Program • Trade adjustment assistance programs • Unemployment Insurance • Veterans' employment and training programs • Employment Services (Wagner-Peyser Act) • Welfare-to-Work grant-funded programs |
Dept. of Labor |
• Employment and training funded by Community Services Block Grants |
Dept. of Health and Human Services |
• HUD-administered employment and training programs |
Dept. of Housing and Urban Development |
Source: GAO Report 02-275 (WIA: Improvemetns Needed in Performance Measures to Provide a More Accurate Picture of WIA's Effectiveness, Feb. 2002) p.8; Workforce Alliance Training Policy in Brief 2006, p. 15 |
APPENDIX D: National Reporting System and CASAS Overview
All states are required under the federal Adult Education and Family Literacy Act to report on five core measures of the effectiveness of their adult literacy activities. The mandated measures and their working definitions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Federally Mandated Measures of Adult Literacy Program Effectiveness | |
AEFLA Core Measures |
Definitions |
1. Demonstrated Literacy Skill Improvement |
|
a. Education Gain Adult Basic and Secondary Education (ABE/ASE)* |
Percentage of adults enrolled in basic literacy programs who acquired the basic skills needed to complete one or more levels of instruction in which they were initially enrolled |
b. Educational Gain English Literacy |
Percentage of adults enrolled in English literacy programs who acquired the level of English language skills needed to complete one or more levels of instruction in which they were enrolled |
2. High School Completion |
Percentage of adult learners with a high school completion goal who earned a high school diploma or GED after exiting the program |
3. Entered Postsecondary Education or Training |
Percentage of adult learners with a goal to continue their education who enter postsecondary education or training after exiting the program |
4. Entered Employment |
Percentage of unemployed adult learners (in the workforce) with an employment goal who were employed at the end of the first quarter after exiting the program |
5. Retained Employment |
Percentage of adult learners with a) a job retention goal at the time of enrollment and b) those with an employment goal who obtained work after leaving the program who were employed at the end of the third quarter after exiting the program |
*ABE/ASE consists of programs covering six instructional levels ranging from beginning literacy to high school completion skills Source of Data: U.S. Department of Education, 2006 AEFLA Annual Report to Congress on State Performance |
States are required to use the National Reporting System (NRS), the AEFLA accountability process developed by the U.S. Department of Education, to report their core measures and other adult literacy activity data. NRS incorporates standard definitions and data collection methodologies to help ensure reliable, comparable performance data is gathered from all state programs
For the all but the first core measure, states can meet the NRS requirements by compiling outcome data based on program records (e.g., diplomas awarded, GED examinations passed), follow-up survey results, or cross-matches of different databases (e.g., adult education and labor/employment databases). Regarding the literacy skill improvement measure, states are required to establish standardized assessment procedures to identify the initial student proficiency as well as to measure gains from program participation. NRS defines six levels of levels of proficiency (Educational Function Levels) for adult basic and secondary programs, and another six levels for ESL programs. The ABE/ASE levels are based on reading, writing, numeracy and functional and workplace skills while the ESL levels also incorporate speaking and listening skills.
The NRS Educational Function Levels for adult basic and secondary programs and for ESL programs are shown in Table 2. According to the U.S. DOE, one NRS level is roughly equal to two grade levels. The literacy skill improvement represented by advancing on Educational Function Level, therefore, is significant.
The NRS levels are benchmarked to common adult literacy assessments, such as the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) used by Connecticut, so that how students function at each level corresponds to their performance (score range) on such standardized tests. The CASAS test scores that correspond to each NRS level are also shown in Table 2. The highest number in each CASAS range is the benchmark test score used to identify learners who complete an NRS level.
Table 2. NRS Educational Function Levels | |||
ABE/ASE NRS Levels |
CASAS Score Range Reading/Math |
ESL NRS Levels |
CASAS Score Range Reading/Math/Listening |
ABE Beginning Literacy |
200 and below |
Beginning Literacy |
180 and below |
ABE Beginning Basic |
201-210 |
Beginning |
181-200 |
ABE Low Intermediate |
211-235 |
Low Intermediate |
201-210 |
ABE High Intermediate |
236-245 |
High Intermediate |
211-220 |
ASE Low |
236-245 |
Low Advanced |
221-235 |
ASE High |
246 and above |
High Advanced * |
N/A |
* Connecticut's adult education system, like those in many other states generally does not serve individuals at a high advanced level of English language proficiency as they tend to be well-educated, with high literacy levels in their native language. These students typically would be referred to postsecondary-level ESL programs, such as those offered by community colleges. The ESL high advanced level is being eliminated from the NRS reporting system by U.S. DOE effective FY 07. Source of Data: SDE, Bureau of Early Childhood, Career and Adult Education, Connecticut Competency System Assessment Policies and Guidelines Fiscal Year 2005-2006, September 2005. |
CASAS. The Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System is one of several nationally recognized tools for measuring adult literacy levels.2 CASAS is approved by both the federal and state education departments for assessing the needs of adult learners and is widely used by state and local education agencies as well as many training program operators across the country. Connecticut is one of at least 30 states that uses CASAS for reporting on the federal core measures of adult education program performance.
CASAS assessment instruments measure literacy levels in terms of defined sets of critical skill sets (competencies) adult need in different contexts. There are about 180 different instruments available for a wide variety of assessment purposes including initial skill appraisal, course and program placement guidance, and diagnosis of instructional needs as well as to monitor and document learning gains and other student outcomes.
A general description of the literacy levels in terms of reading, writing, computational, and functional/workplace skills that correspond to CASAS test scores for both ABE (which CASAS uses to refer to both adult basic and adult secondary education programs) and for ESL students is attached. The five CASAS levels shown in the attachment, which range from A to E for adult basic and secondary education as well as English as Second Language, do not directly relate to the National Reporting System levels. However, federal educational function levels for adult basic and secondary education can be matched to the subcategory descriptions within all five CASAS skill levels for ABE. Similarly, the subcategories for the CASAS skill levels A through C for ESL also match up with the six NRS levels for English language proficiency.
Appendix E. Adult Education Program Providers with Cooperating Districts (2006) | ||
Provider District/RESC |
Number/List of Cooperating District Municipalities | |
Branford School District |
4 |
Clinton, Guilford, Madison, North Branford |
Danbury School District |
6 |
Bethel, Brookfield, New Fairfield, Newtown, Redding, Ridgefield |
Enfield School District |
4 |
East Windsor, Granby, Somers, Suffield |
Fairfield School District |
1 |
Easton |
Farmington School District |
4 |
Avon, Burlington, Canton, Harwinton |
Hamden School District |
3 |
Bethany, Orange, Woodbridge |
Middletown School District |
14 |
Chester, Cromwell, Deep River, Durham, East Haddam, East Hampton, Essex, Haddam, Killingworth, Middlefield, Old Saybrook, Portland, Rocky Hill, Westbrook |
Naugatuck School District |
4 |
Beacon Falls, Oxford, Wolcott*, Prospect* |
New London School District |
4 |
Lyme, Montville, Old Lyme, Waterford |
Norwich School District |
12 |
Bozrah, East Lyme, Franklin, Griswold, Ledyard, Lisbon, North Stonington, Preston, Salem, Sprague, Stonington, Voluntown |
Shelton School District |
4 |
Ansonia, Derby, Monroe, Seymour |
Stamford School District |
2 |
Darien, New Canaan |
Vernon School District |
16 |
Andover, Ashford, Bolton, Colchester, Coventry, Ellington, Glastonbury, Hebron, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, South Windsor, Stafford, Tolland, Union, Willington |
Waterbury School District |
3 |
Watertown, Wolcott*, Prospect* |
Westport School District |
2 |
Weston, Wilton |
Windsor Locks School District |
1 |
East Granby |
Education Connection (RESC) |
27 |
Barkhamsted, Bethlehem, Bridgewater, Canaan, Colebrook, Cornwall, Goshen, Hartland, Kent, Litchfield, Middlebury, Morris, New Hartford, Norfolk, North Canaan, Plymouth, Roxbury, Salisbury, Sharon, Sherman, Southbury, Thomaston, Torrington, Warren, Washington, Winchester, Woodbury |
EastConn (RESC) |
16 |
Brooklyn, Canterbury, Chaplin, Columbia, Eastford, Hampton, Killingly, Lebanon, Plainfield, Pomfret, Putnam, Scotland, Thompson, Windham, Woodstock, Sterling |
Total Providers with Cooperating Districts = 18 |
Total Cooperating District Municipalities = 125 | |
* Wolcott and Prospect have agreements with both Naugatuck and Waterbury Source: PRI staff analysis |
APPENDIX F: Adult Education Providers |
FY 05 Enrollment (# Students attending 12+ hours) |
Budget (est.) FY 05 |
|||||||
PROVIDER |
ABE |
ASE |
ESL* |
Total |
% of Total |
State & Local |
Federal |
Total |
% of Total |
School Districts/RESCs |
|||||||||
Berlin Adult Education |
1 |
7 |
27 |
35 |
0.1% |
$39,790 |
$20,000 |
$59,790 |
0.1% |
Bloomfield Adult Education |
20 |
35 |
7 |
62 |
0.2% |
$62,212 |
$0 |
$62,212 |
0.2% |
Branford Adult Education (ERACE) |
11 |
161 |
127 |
299 |
0.9% |
$177,820 |
$205,000 |
$382,820 |
0.9% |
Bridgeport Adult Education |
387 |
726 |
1,171 |
2,284 |
7.1% |
$2,308,483 |
$170,000 |
$2,478,483 |
6.0% |
Bristol Adult Education |
2 |
273 |
85 |
360 |
1.1% |
$460,610 |
$0 |
$460,610 |
1.1% |
Cheshire Adult Education |
- |
7 |
26 |
33 |
0.1% |
$109,234 |
$0 |
$109,234 |
0.3% |
Danbury Adult Education (WERACE) |
148 |
548 |
723 |
1,419 |
4.4% |
$432,160 |
$170,000 |
$602,160 |
1.5% |
East Hartford Adult Education |
4 |
102 |
116 |
232 |
0.7% |
$179,913 |
$0 |
$179,913 |
0.4% |
East Haven Adult Education |
3 |
200 |
49 |
252 |
0.8% |
$765,928 |
$12,786 |
$778,714 |
1.9% |
Enfield Adult Education |
22 |
200 |
48 |
270 |
0.8% |
$181,333 |
$0 |
$181,333 |
0.4% |
Fairfield Adult Education |
9 |
16 |
73 |
98 |
0.3% |
$138,700 |
$0 |
$138,700 |
0.3% |
Farmington Adult Education |
3 |
11 |
67 |
81 |
0.3% |
$62,706 |
$0 |
$62,706 |
0.2% |
Greenwich Adult Education |
14 |
16 |
286 |
316 |
1.0% |
$164,667 |
$0 |
$164,667 |
0.4% |
Groton Adult Education |
- |
94 |
- |
94 |
0.3% |
$61,682 |
$0 |
$61,682 |
0.2% |
Hamden Adult Education |
72 |
179 |
175 |
426 |
1.3% |
$439,782 |
$155,000 |
$594,782 |
1.4% |
Hartford Adult Education |
262 |
1,692 |
683 |
2,637 |
8.3% |
$6,062,762 |
$88,745 |
$6,151,507 |
15.0% |
Meriden Adult Education |
73 |
395 |
165 |
633 |
2.0% |
$1,657,902 |
$0 |
$1,657,902 |
4.0% |
Middletown Adult Education |
86 |
443 |
245 |
774 |
2.4% |
$2,517,600 |
$190,000 |
$2,707,600 |
6.6% |
Milford Adult Education |
5 |
51 |
29 |
85 |
0.3% |
$125,560 |
$0 |
$125,560 |
0.3% |
Naugatuck Adult Education |
13 |
158 |
89 |
260 |
0.8% |
$377,915 |
$0 |
$377,915 |
0.9% |
New Britain Adult Education |
107 |
421 |
586 |
1,114 |
3.5% |
$1,384,652 |
$185,000 |
$1,569,652 |
3.8% |
New Haven Adult Education |
711 |
1,115 |
1,405 |
3,231 |
10.1% |
$3,667,495 |
$120,000 |
$3,787,495 |
9.2% |
Newington Adult Education |
7 |
76 |
43 |
126 |
0.4% |
$67,105 |
$0 |
$67,105 |
0.2% |
New London Adult Education |
97 |
428 |
379 |
904 |
2.8% |
$1,752,680 |
$167,336 |
$1,920,016 |
4.7% |
New Milford Adult Education |
8 |
101 |
92 |
201 |
0.6% |
$154,870 |
$20,000 |
$174,870 |
0.4% |
North Haven Adult Education |
4 |
13 |
12 |
29 |
0.1% |
$64,065 |
$0 |
$64,065 |
0.2% |
Norwalk Adult Education |
37 |
274 |
555 |
866 |
2.7% |
$296,731 |
$0 |
$296,731 |
0.7% |
Norwich Adult Education |
61 |
524 |
545 |
1,130 |
3.5% |
$1,228,006 |
$215,000 |
$1,443,006 |
3.5% |
Plainville Adult Education |
34 |
59 |
56 |
149 |
0.5% |
$511,296 |
$43,933 |
$555,229 |
1.4% |
Shelton/Valley Reg. Adult Education |
59 |
216 |
279 |
554 |
1.7% |
$584,524 |
$55,000 |
$639,524 |
1.6% |
Simsbury Adult Education |
3 |
3 |
18 |
24 |
0.1% |
$27,180 |
$0 |
$27,180 |
0.1% |
Southington Adult Education |
8 |
4 |
14 |
26 |
0.1% |
$63,012 |
$0 |
$63,012 |
0.2% |
Stamford Adult Education |
132 |
302 |
1,917 |
2,351 |
7.4% |
$1,116,527 |
$155,000 |
$1,271,527 |
3.1% |
Stratford Adult Education |
25 |
82 |
84 |
191 |
0.6% |
$216,287 |
$0 |
$216,287 |
0.5% |
Trumbull Adult Education |
5 |
26 |
55 |
86 |
0.3% |
$179,551 |
$0 |
$179,551 |
0.4% |
Vernon Adult Education |
35 |
568 |
293 |
896 |
2.8% |
$1,164,113 |
$164,979 |
$1,329,092 |
3.2% |
Wallingford Adult Education |
31 |
115 |
137 |
283 |
0.9% |
$680,045 |
$55,000 |
$735,045 |
1.8% |
Waterbury Adult Education |
218 |
904 |
884 |
2,006 |
6.3% |
$2,922,315 |
$110,000 |
$3,032,315 |
7.4% |
West Hartford Adult Education |
15 |
59 |
253 |
327 |
1.0% |
$372,675 |
$50,000 |
$422,675 |
1.0% |
West Haven Adult Education |
27 |
184 |
102 |
313 |
1.0% |
$210,000 |
$0 |
$210,000 |
0.5% |
Westport Adult Education |
- |
15 |
172 |
187 |
0.6% |
$230,025 |
$0 |
$230,025 |
0.6% |
Wethersfield Adult Education |
8 |
24 |
52 |
84 |
0.3% |
$68,344 |
$0 |
$68,344 |
0.2% |
Windsor Adult Education |
43 |
35 |
38 |
116 |
0.4% |
$216,316 |
$81,645 |
$297,961 |
0.7% |
Windsor Locks Adult Education |
17 |
23 |
23 |
63 |
0.2% |
$45,438 |
$0 |
$45,438 |
0.1% |
CREC |
91 |
83 |
133 |
307 |
1.0% |
$600,440 |
$100,000 |
$700,440 |
1.7% |
Education Connection |
54 |
151 |
183 |
388 |
1.2% |
$765,512 |
$180,000 |
$945,512 |
2.3% |
EastConn |
93 |
546 |
197 |
836 |
2.6% |
$1,011,771 |
$255,000 |
$1,266,771 |
3.1% |
CEEs |
|||||||||
Family Services Woodfield |
75 |
- |
272 |
347 |
1.1% |
$146,898 |
$45,000 |
$191,898 |
0.5% |
Literacy Volunteers - Danbury |
- |
- |
21 |
21 |
0.1% |
$55,255 |
$0 |
$55,255 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - East Hartford |
27 |
- |
16 |
43 |
0.1% |
$40,636 |
$0 |
$40,636 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - Enfield |
9 |
- |
13 |
22 |
0.1% |
$26,887 |
$0 |
$26,887 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - Greater Hartford |
102 |
- |
130 |
232 |
0.7% |
$234,310 |
$0 |
$234,310 |
0.6% |
Literacy Volunteers - Meriden |
12 |
- |
26 |
38 |
0.1% |
$38,896 |
$0 |
$38,896 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - Middletown |
4 |
- |
10 |
14 |
0.0% |
$32,687 |
$0 |
$32,687 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - New Britain / Bristol |
8 |
- |
76 |
84 |
0.3% |
$67,813 |
$0 |
$67,813 |
0.2% |
Literacy Volunteers - New Haven |
32 |
- |
55 |
87 |
0.3% |
$78,805 |
$0 |
$78,805 |
0.2% |
Literacy Volunteers - New London |
- |
- |
76 |
76 |
0.2% |
$82,945 |
$0 |
$82,945 |
0.2% |
Literacy Volunteers - Norwich |
- |
- |
45 |
45 |
0.1% |
$41,315 |
$0 |
$41,315 |
0.1% |
Literacy Volunteers - Stamford/Greenwich |
- |
- |
155 |
155 |
0.5% |
$140,720 |
$0 |
$140,720 |
0.3% |
Literacy Volunteers - Waterbury |
7 |
- |
39 |
46 |
0.1% |
$38,593 |
$0 |
$38,593 |
0.1% |
Urban League |
188 |
58 |
- |
246 |
0.8% |
$190,859 |
$85,000 |
$275,859 |
0.7% |
Waterbury OIC |
5 |
- |
- |
5 |
0.0% |
$19,835 |
$0 |
$19,835 |
0.0% |
YMCA of Metro Hartford - Read to Succeed |
18 |
- |
- |
18 |
0.1% |
$121,462 |
$0 |
$121,462 |
0.3% |
Other (Federal Funds Only) |
|||||||||
Department of Corrections |
1,093 |
1,351 |
- |
2,444 |
7.6% |
||||
APT Foundation |
18 |
16 |
- |
34 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Bullard Havens Tech. High School |
22 |
- |
60 |
82 |
0.3% |
$0 |
$154,921 |
$154,921 |
0.4% |
Connecticut Puerto Rican Forum |
- |
- |
18 |
18 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Connecticut Renaissance |
27 |
11 |
- |
38 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Housing Authority of Ansonia |
8 |
10 |
- |
18 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Housing Authority of Meriden |
- |
- |
27 |
27 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Mercy Learning Center |
64 |
28 |
27 |
119 |
0.4% |
$0 |
$100,330 |
$100,330 |
0.2% |
NW CT Community Technical College |
58 |
76 |
84 |
218 |
0.7% |
$0 |
$140,000 |
$140,000 |
0.3% |
Southend Community Services |
- |
- |
37 |
37 |
0.1% |
$0 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
0.1% |
Village for Families And Children |
- |
- |
6 |
6 |
0.0% |
||||
TOTAL |
4,852 |
13,215 |
13,891 |
31,958 |
$37,285,650 |
$3,794,675 |
$41,080,325 |
||
*Note: ESL enrollment figures also include Citizenship Program |
|||||||||
Source of Data: SDE Bureau of Early Childhood, Career and Adult Education |
Appendix G.
Workforce Investment Act: Provisions for Employment and Training Programs
In Connecticut, the state Department of Labor is the designated administrative entity for the employment and training parts of the Workforce Investment Act (i.e., WIA Titles I and III), while the State Education Department is the designated entity for the act's adult education and literacy portion (Title II, the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act). The WIA programs overseen by the state DOL include: labor exchange services (also known as Wagner-Peyser services), which are job search, referral, placement and re-employment assistance as well as recruitment services for employers; and employment support and training programs for three categories of jobseekers. The three categories are:
• adults (persons 18 or older);
• youth (low-income persons age 14 through 21 who meet certain conditions that require assistance to complete their education or secure employment, such as deficient basic literacy skills, pregnancy, or homelessness); and
• dislocated workers (individuals who have been terminated or laid off from their jobs, or received termination or layoff notices, are eligible for or have exhausted unemployment benefits, are self-employed but unemployed because of general economic conditions, or are displaced homemakers).
WIA Title I services. Three sequential tiers of services, which must be provided through one-stop centers, are funded under WIA Title I: core; intensive; and training. Core services are primarily self-service activities and include job search and placement assistance, labor market information, as well as and information about training, unemployment and other benefits and supports (e.g., child care or transportation assistance). They are available to any jobseeker coming to a one-stop center.
Intensive services are available to individuals who complete one or more core services and are still unemployed or underemployed and may include: individual career planning and counseling, resume preparation, job clubs, internships, and comprehensive assessments. Persons who have received one or more intensive services as well as core services and are still unable to find a job may be eligible for WIA-funded employment training and education. By law, priority for WIA intensive and training services is given to public assistance recipients and other low-income individuals and to veterans.
Training. WIA-funded training services, for the most part, must be provided through Individual Training Accounts (ITAs), which operate like vouchers for vocational training and education services. Individuals can use their accounts to purchase training services from anyone on the eligible provider list prepared by the local workforce investment board for their area, as well as for tuition, books, supplies and other related training costs. Eligible training providers can include public or private training programs that meet state-established criteria, organizations that carry out certain apprenticeship programs, and post-secondary education institutions including two-year and four-year colleges and universities.
Connecticut WIA System Components
Connecticut's workforce investment system, as mandated by federal law, consists of a state administering agency, state-level and local-level workforce investment boards, an agency that staffs the state board, and a network of one-stop service delivery centers. Each major component is described briefly below.
Connecticut Department of Labor (DOL)
• State agency responsible for administering federal and state employment service, unemployment insurance, and employment and training program
• Regulates and enforces working conditions, wage standards, and labor relations
• Broad administrative role for WIA employment and training programs and directly operates Jobs First Employment Services (JFES), Connecticut's welfare-to-work program for eligible clients of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which is administered by the state Department of Social Services
Connecticut Employment and Training Commission (CETC)/ State-level Workforce Investment Board
• Established by legislature in 1989 and replaced the state Job Training Coordinating Council, taking over its statewide coordinating duties mandated under the federal Job Training Partnership Act of 1978; given additional responsibility for reviewing and reporting on the success of state employment and training programs
• At present, functions as State Workforce Investment Board mandated under WIA; authorized under P.A. 99-195 to implement the federal act in Connecticut, serving as vehicle for developing state and local policies, processes and structures to achieve state workforce investment goals; within the state labor department until July 1, 2000, when transferred to the Office of Workforce Competitiveness (P.A. 00-120)
• By state law, comprised of 24 members with majority representing business and industry; remainder representing state and local government (current members include commissioners of education, higher education, economic and community development, labor and social services), organized labor, education, and community-based organizations; all members appointed by the governor from recommendations submitted by legislative leadership
• Required to develop and update the state's single five-year strategic plan for implementing the goals of WIA in consultation with the regional workforce investment boards (described below); additionally responsible for submitting recommendations to the governor and legislature on the appropriation of the state's federal WIA grant funding
• Required to develop, and include in its annual report to the governor and legislature, an education and job training report card that assesses the accomplishments of the state workforce investment system in accordance with federal accountability requirements
Office of Workforce Competitiveness (OWC)
• Initially established by Executive Order #14 (April 12, 1999), but made a statutory agency within the Office of Policy and Management for administrative purposes only under P.A. 00-192
• Purpose is to provide the governor with advice on workforce investment matters and coordinate the workforce development activities of all state agencies
• Must supply to the governor and legislature, with the assistance of the state labor department, necessary reports, information and assistance, drawing on any state agency for help, and serve as staff to support CETC and the JOBs Cabinet.
• Connecticut's JOBs Cabinet was also created by the governor under Executive Order #14 as the implementation arm for CETC; chaired by OWC Director, other cabinet members include the commissioners of labor, economic and community development, education, and social services, the OPM Secretary and the Community Colleges Chancellor
Regional Workforce Development Boards/Local Workforce Investment Boards (WIBs)
• System of regional workforce development boards, based on business-led Private Industry Councils that had been established as part of earlier federal employment and training legislation created in Connecticut in 1992
• Regional boards now function as the local workforce investment boards mandated under WIA; each board also required by WIA to have a youth council
• Similar to CETC, business members must constitute the majority of regional board members and whenever possible, at least half of the business and industry representatives should be small businesses including minority businesses
• Nonbusiness members must include representatives of community-based organizations, state and local governments, state and local organized labor, human service agencies, economic development agencies, and regional community-technical colleges and other educational institutions including secondary and postsecondary institutions and regional vocational-technical schools
• Regional board members appointed by local elected officials from the service area; boards required to broadly represent the interests of the region's population including welfare recipients, persons with disabilities, veterans, dislocated workers, younger and older workers, women, minorities, and displaced homemakers; number of members on a regional board in Connecticut ranges as high as 80
• In accordance with state and federal law, the regional boards plan and coordinate workforce investment programs and services at the local level within their region in partnership with local elected officials; boards have oversight, planning, policy-making and funding authority for regional workforce investment activities.
Connecticut Works (CTWorks) Centers/One-Stop Centers
• Statewide network of job centers offering comprehensive workforce development assistance to workers, students, and employers known as Connecticut Works; in place before one-stop employment and training delivery systems were federally mandated by the 1998 Workforce Investment Act (See P.A. 94-116)
• 20 CTWorks centers operate throughout the state under the direction of the regional workforce boards in partnership with DOL and serve as the state's WIA one-stop system.
• Provide full array of employment services to jobseekers – job referral, job search, job development, and career workshops; customers who meet eligibility requirement of WIA programs for adults, youth, and dislocated workers, or are JFES program participants, can receive individualized career guidance and financial assistance for job training
• For employers, one-stop centers will assist with employee recruitment and job applicant screening and provide labor market and information on tax credits and other job-related assistance for businesses; if certain federal requirements are met, employers may be eligible for customized and on-the-job training programs.
APPENDIX H. SDE 2006-2007 PRELIMINARY Adult Education Reimbursement Percentages Based on Current Law
Town |
Name |
Percentage |
Town |
Name |
Percentage | |
1 |
ANDOVER |
40.63 |
65 |
HARTLAND |
41.40 | |
2 |
ANSONIA |
62.29 |
67 |
HEBRON |
33.27 | |
3 |
ASHFORD |
53.01 |
68 |
KENT |
8.13 | |
4 |
AVON |
6.96 |
69 |
KILLINGLY |
61.52 | |
5 |
BARKHAMSTED |
32.50 |
71 |
LEBANON |
46.04 | |
7 |
BERLIN |
31.34 |
72 |
LEDYARD |
45.27 | |
8 |
BETHANY |
21.28 |
73 |
LISBON |
48.36 | |
9 |
BETHEL |
29.02 |
74 |
LITCHFIELD |
18.57 | |
11 |
BLOOMFIELD |
30.95 |
76 |
MADISON |
10.06 | |
12 |
BOLTON |
37.53 |
77 |
MANCHESTER |
46.43 | |
13 |
BOZRAH |
40.24 |
78 |
MANSFIELD |
58.81 | |
14 |
BRANFORD |
21.67 |
79 |
MARLBOROUGH |
24.76 | |
15 |
BRIDGEPORT |
63.45 |
80 |
MERIDEN |
60.74 | |
17 |
BRISTOL |
58.42 |
83 |
MIDDLETOWN |
58.18 | |
18 |
BROOKFIELD |
10.83 |
84 |
MILFORD |
20.89 | |
19 |
BROOKLYN |
59.20 |
85 |
MONROE |
15.86 | |
21 |
CANAAN |
15.48 |
86 |
MONTVILLE |
51.07 | |
22 |
CANTERBURY |
53.39 |
88 |
NAUGATUCK |
60.36 | |
23 |
CANTON |
23.21 |
89 |
NEW BRITAIN |
64.61 | |
24 |
CHAPLIN |
56.10 |
90 |
NEW CANAAN |
0.39 | |
25 |
CHESHIRE |
22.44 |
91 |
NEW FAIRFIELD |
15.09 | |
26 |
CHESTER |
17.41 |
92 |
NEW HARTFORD |
28.24 | |
27 |
CLINTON |
27.47 |
93 |
NEW HAVEN |
63.07 | |
28 |
COLCHESTER |
43.33 |
94 |
NEWINGTON |
37.14 | |
29 |
COLEBROOK |
22.05 |
95 |
NEW LONDON |
61.90 | |
30 |
COLUMBIA |
31.73 |
96 |
NEW MILFORD |
25.15 | |
31 |
CORNWALL |
4.64 |
97 |
NEWTOWN |
13.93 | |
32 |
COVENTRY |
44.11 |
98 |
NORFOLK |
12.38 | |
33 |
CROMWELL |
35.98 |
99 |
NORTH BRANFORD |
34.05 | |
34 |
DANBURY |
47.59 |
100 |
NORTH CANAAN |
50.30 | |
35 |
DARIEN |
0.77 |
101 |
NORTH HAVEN |
20.12 | |
36 |
DEEP RIVER |
19.73 |
102 |
NORTH STONINGTON |
28.63 | |
37 |
DERBY |
51.85 |
103 |
NORWALK |
20.00 | |
39 |
EASTFORD |
49.91 |
104 |
NORWICH |
65.00 | |
40 |
EAST GRANBY |
24.38 |
106 |
OLD SAYBROOK |
9.67 | |
41 |
EAST HADDAM |
38.30 |
107 |
ORANGE |
10.45 | |
42 |
EAST HAMPTON |
47.20 |
108 |
OXFORD |
27.08 | |
43 |
EAST HARTFORD |
56.49 |
109 |
PLAINFIELD |
62.68 | |
44 |
EAST HAVEN |
53.78 |
110 |
PLAINVILLE |
45.65 | |
45 |
EAST LYME |
25.92 |
111 |
PLYMOUTH |
54.17 | |
46 |
EASTON |
4.26 |
112 |
POMFRET |
41.01 | |
47 |
EAST WINDSOR |
42.95 |
113 |
PORTLAND |
39.85 | |
48 |
ELLINGTON |
42.56 |
114 |
PRESTON |
51.46 | |
49 |
ENFIELD |
54.55 |
116 |
PUTNAM |
57.26 | |
50 |
ESSEX |
7.35 |
117 |
REDDING |
5.42 | |
51 |
FAIRFIELD |
6.19 |
118 |
RIDGEFIELD |
3.87 | |
52 |
FARMINGTON |
12.77 |
119 |
ROCKY HILL |
26.31 | |
53 |
FRANKLIN |
36.76 |
121 |
SALEM |
33.66 | |
54 |
GLASTONBURY |
16.64 |
122 |
SALISBURY |
5.80 | |
56 |
GRANBY |
30.18 |
123 |
SCOTLAND |
55.71 | |
57 |
GREENWICH |
0.00 |
124 |
SEYMOUR |
44.49 | |
58 |
GRISWOLD |
58.04 |
125 |
SHARON |
5.03 | |
59 |
GROTON |
37.92 |
126 |
SHELTON |
18.96 | |
60 |
GUILFORD |
14.32 |
127 |
SHERMAN |
8.51 | |
62 |
HAMDEN |
46.82 |
128 |
SIMSBURY |
18.18 | |
63 |
HAMPTON |
49.14 |
129 |
SOMERS |
49.52 | |
64 |
HARTFORD |
65.00 |
131 |
SOUTHINGTON |
38.69 |
Town |
Name |
Percentage |
||||
132 |
SOUTH WINDSOR |
29.40 |
||||
133 |
SPRAGUE |
52.23 |
||||
134 |
STAFFORD |
55.33 |
||||
135 |
STAMFORD |
20.00 |
||||
136 |
STERLING |
61.13 |
||||
137 |
STONINGTON |
19.35 |
||||
138 |
STRATFORD |
34.43 |
||||
139 |
SUFFIELD |
35.60 |
||||
140 |
THOMASTON |
43.72 |
||||
141 |
THOMPSON |
54.94 |
||||
142 |
TOLLAND |
36.37 |
||||
143 |
TORRINGTON |
57.65 |
||||
144 |
TRUMBULL |
11.61 |
||||
145 |
UNION |
29.79 |
||||
146 |
VERNON |
52.62 |
||||
147 |
VOLUNTOWN |
48.75 |
||||
148 |
WALLINGFORD |
34.82 |
||||
151 |
WATERBURY |
64.23 |
||||
152 |
WATERFORD |
17.02 |
||||
153 |
WATERTOWN |
39.08 |
||||
154 |
WESTBROOK |
11.99 |
||||
155 |
WEST HARTFORD |
23.60 |
||||
156 |
WEST HAVEN |
59.97 |
||||
157 |
WESTON |
1.55 |
||||
158 |
WESTPORT |
1.16 |
||||
159 |
WETHERSFIELD |
32.11 |
||||
160 |
WILLINGTON |
44.88 |
||||
161 |
WILTON |
1.93 |
||||
162 |
WINCHESTER |
56.88 |
||||
163 |
WINDHAM |
63.84 |
||||
164 |
WINDSOR |
30.57 |
||||
165 |
WINDSOR LOCKS |
35.21 |
||||
166 |
WOLCOTT |
47.98 |
||||
167 |
WOODBRIDGE |
7.74 |
||||
169 |
WOODSTOCK |
41.79 |
||||
201 |
DISTRICT NO. 1 |
16.25 |
||||
204 |
DISTRICT NO. 4 |
13.93 |
||||
205 |
DISTRICT NO. 5 |
11.99 |
||||
206 |
DISTRICT NO. 6 |
14.32 |
||||
207 |
DISTRICT NO. 7 |
27.08 |
||||
208 |
DISTRICT NO. 8 |
31.73 |
||||
209 |
DISTRICT NO. 9 |
5.03 |
||||
210 |
DISTRICT NO. 10 |
24.38 |
||||
211 |
DISTRICT NO. 11 |
53.78 |
||||
212 |
DISTRICT NO. 12 |
3.10 |
||||
213 |
DISTRICT NO. 13 |
29.79 |
||||
214 |
DISTRICT NO. 14 |
14.70 |
||||
215 |
DISTRICT NO. 15 |
16.64 |
||||
216 |
DISTRICT NO. 16 |
40.63 |
||||
217 |
DISTRICT NO. 17 |
23.60 |
||||
218 |
DISTRICT NO. 18 |
5.80 |
||||
219 |
DISTRICT NO. 19 |
54.17 |
||||
241 |
CREC |
42.95 |
||||
242 |
EDUCATION CONNECTION |
31.34 |
||||
243 |
C.E.S |
20.51 |
||||
244 |
ACES |
46.82 |
||||
245 |
LEARN |
33.27 |
||||
253 |
EASTCONN |
51.07 |
APPENDIX I. State and Local Adult Education Expenditures: FY 05 | |||
District |
State Grant Payment |
Total State & Local Spending |
% Local |
ANSONIA |
$ 67,427 |
$ 125,000 |
46% |
AVON |
$ 615 |
$ 13,854 |
96% |
BARKHAMSTED |
$ 1,071 |
$ 4,239 |
75% |
BERLIN |
$ 8,691 |
$ 39,777 |
78% |
BETHEL |
$ 4,717 |
$ 22,654 |
79% |
BLOOMFIELD |
$ 19,542 |
$ 69,874 |
72% |
BOLTON |
$ 3,326 |
$ 10,825 |
69% |
BOZRAH |
$ 3,299 |
$ 12,081 |
73% |
BRANFORD |
$ 19,121 |
$ 101,830 |
81% |
BRIDGEPORT |
$ 1,077,651 |
$ 1,957,854 |
45% |
BRISTOL |
$ 203,166 |
$ 440,826 |
54% |
BROOKFIELD |
$ 1,893 |
$ 16,310 |
88% |
BROOKLYN |
$ 21,737 |
$ 41,078 |
47% |
CANTERBURY |
$ 9,090 |
$ 18,363 |
50% |
CANTON |
$ 1,511 |
$ 7,500 |
80% |
CHAPLIN |
$ 1,918 |
$ 3,985 |
52% |
CHESHIRE |
$ 19,898 |
$ 102,269 |
81% |
CLINTON |
$ 3,379 |
$ 11,120 |
70% |
COLCHESTER |
$ 17,478 |
$ 44,520 |
61% |
COLEBROOK |
$ 319 |
$ 1,282 |
75% |
COLUMBIA |
$ 1,375 |
$ 5,097 |
73% |
COVENTRY |
$ 8,950 |
$ 21,663 |
59% |
CROMWELL |
$ 12,548 |
$ 49,000 |
74% |
DANBURY |
$ 120,140 |
$ 366,117 |
67% |
DARIEN |
$ 51 |
$ 7,500 |
99% |
DERBY |
$ 63,798 |
$ 129,779 |
51% |
EASTFORD |
$ 1,539 |
$ 3,886 |
60% |
EAST GRANBY |
$ 871 |
$ 5,000 |
83% |
EAST HADDAM |
$ 4,666 |
$ 17,750 |
74% |
EAST HAMPTON |
$ 21,646 |
$ 50,725 |
57% |
EAST HARTFORD |
$ 101,509 |
$ 225,686 |
55% |
EAST HAVEN |
$ 381,189 |
$ 759,478 |
50% |
EAST LYME |
$ 14,324 |
$ 51,795 |
72% |
EASTON |
$ 84 |
$ 3,500 |
98% |
EAST WINDSOR |
$ 9,208 |
$ 25,205 |
63% |
ELLINGTON |
$ 12,110 |
$ 30,315 |
60% |
ENFIELD |
$ 61,363 |
$ 138,998 |
56% |
FAIRFIELD |
$ 7,850 |
$ 135,200 |
94% |
FARMINGTON |
$ 3,446 |
$ 36,053 |
90% |
FRANKLIN |
$ 2,135 |
$ 7,354 |
71% |
GLASTONBURY |
$ 4,207 |
$ 35,214 |
88% |
GRANBY |
$ 2,133 |
$ 9,611 |
78% |
GREENWICH |
$ - |
$ 206,346 |
100% |
GRISWOLD |
$ 45,714 |
$ 87,511 |
48% |
GROTON |
$ 83,209 |
$ 234,339 |
64% |
GUILFORD |
$ 2,578 |
$ 21,019 |
88% |
HAMDEN |
$ 172,692 |
$ 386,163 |
55% |
HAMPTON |
$ 1,085 |
$ 2,463 |
56% |
HARTFORD |
$ 3,345,351 |
$ 6,096,222 |
45% |
HARTLAND |
$ 1,526 |
$ 4,340 |
65% |
District |
State Grant Payment |
Total State & Local Spending |
% Local |
KILLINGLY |
$ 62,503 |
$ 122,867 |
49% |
LEBANON |
$ 6,432 |
$ 15,832 |
59% |
LEDYARD |
$ 16,365 |
$ 39,292 |
58% |
LISBON |
$ 9,780 |
$ 21,537 |
55% |
LITCHFIELD |
$ 1,318 |
$ 7,154 |
82% |
MADISON |
$ 1,750 |
$ 19,748 |
91% |
MANCHESTER |
$ 206,236 |
$ 503,386 |
59% |
MERIDEN |
$ 836,269 |
$ 1,578,505 |
47% |
MIDDLETOWN |
$ 934,938 |
$ 2,078,936 |
55% |
MILFORD |
$ 30,867 |
$ 125,560 |
75% |
MONROE |
$ 8,958 |
$ 59,650 |
85% |
MONTVILLE |
$ 25,230 |
$ 54,338 |
54% |
NAUGATUCK |
$ 148,431 |
$ 282,332 |
47% |
NEW BRITAIN |
$ 643,253 |
$ 1,162,627 |
45% |
NEW CANAAN |
$ 11 |
$ 3,000 |
100% |
NEW FAIRFIELD |
$ 2,419 |
$ 15,404 |
84% |
NEW HARTFORD |
$ 1,678 |
$ 7,123 |
76% |
NEW HAVEN |
$ 1,932,595 |
$ 3,511,933 |
45% |
NEWINGTON |
$ 24,284 |
$ 67,105 |
64% |
NEW LONDON |
$ 819,347 |
$ 1,526,746 |
46% |
NEW MILFORD |
$ 35,620 |
$ 153,430 |
77% |
NEWTOWN |
$ 2,475 |
$ 22,654 |
89% |
NORFOLK |
$ 208 |
$ 1,967 |
89% |
NORTH BRANFORD |
$ 5,774 |
$ 18,185 |
68% |
NORTH HAVEN |
$ 12,647 |
$ 74,065 |
83% |
NORTH STONINGTON |
$ 7,427 |
$ 21,537 |
66% |
NORWALK |
$ 52,367 |
$ 296,731 |
82% |
NORWICH |
$ 360,312 |
$ 648,088 |
44% |
OLD SAYBROOK |
$ 6,272 |
$ 63,350 |
90% |
OXFORD |
$ 717 |
$ 2,500 |
71% |
PLAINFIELD |
$ 74,009 |
$ 135,497 |
45% |
PLAINVILLE |
$ 223,418 |
$ 511,296 |
56% |
PLYMOUTH |
$ 2,644 |
$ 5,570 |
53% |
POMFRET |
$ 3,796 |
$ 10,017 |
62% |
PORTLAND |
$ 12,355 |
$ 38,500 |
68% |
PRESTON |
$ 16,043 |
$ 37,294 |
57% |
PUTNAM |
$ 41,257 |
$ 80,556 |
49% |
REDDING |
$ 111 |
$ 3,625 |
97% |
RIDGEFIELD |
$ 273 |
$ 9,967 |
97% |
ROCKY HILL |
$ 9,149 |
$ 40,000 |
77% |
SALEM |
$ 3,365 |
$ 9,664 |
65% |
SCOTLAND |
$ 1,112 |
$ 2,430 |
54% |
SEYMOUR |
$ 40,736 |
$ 97,005 |
58% |
SHELTON |
$ 24,578 |
$ 139,374 |
82% |
SHERMAN |
$ 254 |
$ 2,983 |
91% |
SIMSBURY |
$ 6,100 |
$ 43,587 |
86% |
SOMERS |
$ 7,600 |
$ 17,952 |
58% |
SOUTHINGTON |
$ 17,012 |
$ 51,909 |
67% |
SOUTH WINDSOR |
$ 8,535 |
$ 35,214 |
76% |
SPRAGUE |
$ 11,206 |
$ 22,482 |
50% |
STAFFORD |
$ 20,313 |
$ 40,203 |
49% |
District |
State Grant Payment |
Total State & Local Spending |
% Local |
STAMFORD |
$ 217,398 |
$ 1,254,022 |
83% |
STERLING |
$ 8,134 |
$ 15,778 |
48% |
STONINGTON |
$ 16,297 |
$ 101,589 |
84% |
STRATFORD |
$ 71,627 |
$ 216,287 |
67% |
SUFFIELD |
$ 5,296 |
$ 17,045 |
69% |
THOMASTON |
$ 10,063 |
$ 26,796 |
62% |
THOMPSON |
$ 35,215 |
$ 67,860 |
48% |
TOLLAND |
$ 7,989 |
$ 24,631 |
68% |
TORRINGTON |
$ 55,642 |
$ 114,776 |
52% |
TRUMBULL |
$ 23,908 |
$ 179,551 |
87% |
UNION |
$ 1,236 |
$ 4,642 |
73% |
VERNON |
$ 135,163 |
$ 288,956 |
53% |
VOLUNTOWN |
$ 5,823 |
$ 12,922 |
55% |
WALLINGFORD |
$ 222,516 |
$ 658,410 |
66% |
WATERBURY |
$ 1,575,674 |
$ 2,870,066 |
45% |
WATERFORD |
$ 5,040 |
$ 77,717 |
94% |
WATERTOWN |
$ 4,117 |
$ 11,485 |
64% |
WESTBROOK |
$ 982 |
$ 7,775 |
87% |
WEST HARTFORD |
$ 68,307 |
$ 322,675 |
79% |
WEST HAVEN |
$ 119,428 |
$ 220,000 |
46% |
WESTON |
$ 349 |
$ 25,526 |
99% |
WESTPORT |
$ 1,654 |
$ 161,666 |
99% |
WETHERSFIELD |
$ 20,534 |
$ 68,344 |
70% |
WILTON |
$ 435 |
$ 25,526 |
98% |
WINCHESTER |
$ 8,691 |
$ 18,182 |
52% |
WINDHAM |
$ 196,529 |
$ 348,873 |
44% |
WINDSOR |
$ 61,291 |
$ 216,316 |
72% |
WINDSOR LOCKS |
$ 9,940 |
$ 38,317 |
74% |
WOLCOTT |
$ 4,114 |
$ 10,213 |
60% |
WOODSTOCK |
$ 7,198 |
$ 18,492 |
61% |
DISTRICT NO. 1 |
$ 8,622 |
$ 60,127 |
86% |
DISTRICT NO. 4 |
$ 7,583 |
$ 56,950 |
87% |
DISTRICT NO. 5 |
$ 2,254 |
$ 20,000 |
89% |
DISTRICT NO. 6 |
$ 376 |
$ 3,243 |
88% |
DISTRICT NO. 7 |
$ 3,571 |
$ 15,844 |
77% |
DISTRICT NO. 8 |
$ 6,145 |
$ 22,222 |
72% |
DISTRICT NO. 10 |
$ 995 |
$ 4,700 |
79% |
DISTRICT NO. 12 |
$ 90 |
$ 2,400 |
96% |
DISTRICT NO. 13 |
$ 11,471 |
$ 40,000 |
71% |
DISTRICT NO. 14 |
$ 3,981 |
$ 24,820 |
84% |
DISTRICT NO. 15 |
$ 456 |
$ 3,342 |
86% |
DISTRICT NO. 16 |
$ 3,710 |
$ 9,970 |
63% |
DISTRICT NO. 17 |
$ 9,996 |
$ 48,000 |
79% |
DISTRICT NO. 18 |
$ 2,017 |
$ 29,536 |
93% |
DISTRICT NO. 19 |
$ 44,296 |
$ 86,490 |
49% |
CREC |
$ 216,784 |
$ 582,582 |
63% |
ED. CONNECTION |
$ 119,124 |
$ 465,195 |
74% |
EASTCONN |
$ 28,944 |
$ 66,965 |
57% |
TOTAL |
$ 16,064,500 |
$ 35,006,101 |
54% |
Source of Data: SDE, June 23, 2006 |
APPENDIX J
Survey of Connecticut Adult Education Program Providers (October 2006)
Your Program Name: [SENT TO 47 PROVIDERS; 33 SURVEYS RETURNED (70% response rate)]
1. Do you maintain a formal waiting list for your mandated adult education classes? 22 yes 11 no (n=33)
2. At present, how many individuals are waiting for an opening to participate in your mandated adult education programs and how many are participating? Please provide the information below, if available:
Information as of ___________ 2006 (date) |
ABE |
GED |
CDP |
EDP |
ESL |
Total Number Participating in Classes (range of responses) |
2-278 n=27 |
3-285 n=28 |
44-1,210 n=21 |
0-44 n=14 |
6-1,496 n=26 |
Total Number Waiting for Classes (range of responses) |
0-92 n=16 |
0-44 n=17 |
0-46 n=15 |
0-5 n=9 |
0-315 n=19 |
3. For your Fall 2006 program schedule, have you added classes or increased class sizes to accommodate student demand for your mandated adult education programs? Please check all that apply.
Added Class(es): 18 (n=30) |
12 ABE |
3 GED |
10 CDP |
13 ESL |
Increased Class Size: 16 (n=31) |
13 ABE |
9 GED |
8 CDP |
11 ESL |
4. What are the current sizes of your mandated adult education program classes? In general, what would you like your average class size to be for each type of program?
ABE |
GED |
CDP |
ESL | |
Smallest Class Size (Number) |
||||
Largest Class Size (Number) |
||||
Actual Average Class Size (Number) (range of responses) |
1.5-25 (n=31) |
1.5-34.5 (n=34.5) |
7-26 (n=22) |
6-30 (n=32) |
Goal Average Class Size (Number) |
5. What is your policy regarding participation in your mandated adult education programs by individuals who are not residents of your school district(s)? Check one:
14 (n=33) Allow any nonresident to participate without charge if space is available
3 (n=33) Allow any nonresident to participate if space is available and charge nonresident's town
7 (n=33) Do not allow nonresidents to participate
9 (n=33) Other (please explain) e.g., allow if work in town; allow if live in other town but near site, etc.
6. In general, when are your mandated adult education classes available?
Offered Daytime? 29 yes (n=32) |
Offered Evening? 32 yes (n=32) |
Offered Weekend? 6 yes (n=32) |
Offered Summer? 23 yes (n=32) | |
ABE Classes |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
GED Classes |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
CDP Classes |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
ESL Classes |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
___ Yes ___ No |
7. At present, how many staff do you employ for your mandated adult education programs?
Total Number |
Number Full-Time (18 no FT positions) | |
Number Teachers (range) |
2-82 (n=33) |
0-27 (n=33); 22 no FT teachers |
Number Counselors (range) |
0-15 (n=33) |
0-3 (n=33); 23 no FT counselors |
8. Do you offer any adult education classes or programs targeted for adults with special needs (e.g., free adult special education classes, basic education instruction for deaf or hearing impaired adults, community living courses for adults with developmental disabilities, etc.)? 19 no 12 yes (n=31)
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________________
APPENDIX K
Workforce Challenges Facing Connecticut
Highlights from “Connecticut Demographics and Economics”
by the Office of Workforce Competitiveness (OWC)3
“The global transition to knowledge economy raises levels of skills needed in workplace … a strong foundation in math, science, literacy skills and technology is critical.” (p. 5)
“Connecticut's economy must be fueled by innovation and skilled talent to remain competitive and will depend heavily on …”
• research and development, venture capital, technology transfer and commercialization
• skills upgrading for existing workers, especially older workers staying on the job longer
• increased numbers of graduates in math, science, technology and engineering fields (p. 66).
According to OWC, the combination of Connecticut's economic and demographic profiles, in light of the worldwide movement from an industrial economy to an information-based economy, present a significant challenges to generating and retaining the skilled workforce the state needs to be competitive. Among the most significant concerns are: no population growth; barely any workforce growth, with most increases due to immigration; an aging population; a net loss of young, entry-level workers (college-age up to age 34); and the fact much of tomorrow's available workforce will come from areas of high poverty. Poverty remains a critical factor affecting academic achievement. Low graduation rates among minority students and significantly lower student performance on state tests in urban districts mean many individuals in state's “talent pipeline” will be unprepared for and lack the minimum skills levels needed in a knowledge-based economy.
A Demographic Snapshot
• Connecticut ranks:
- 45th in total population growth
- 10th in the percentage of residents age 65 and older
- 18th in projected population growth to 2025, with a 0.0% expected growth rate over the period
- 7th oldest state in the nation, with a median age 38.5 in 2003 and projected to reach 40 by 2008
- 14th in the percentage of the population made up of immigrants and 12th in projected increase through 2025
- 4th in exportation of college-bound students, and a “net exporter” of college students
- 23rd in projected high school graduates over the period 2002-2018
• By 2010, those over age 45 will represent 40 percent of Connecticut's workforce.
• There are more individuals over 62 than there are teenagers in Connecticut and twice as many households without school-aged children as those with.
• The 20-34 age cohort in Connecticut declined at roughly twice the national average between 1990 and 2000 (over 20% compared to 12%).
• Student in poor communities, compared to the statewide average, are:
- 17 times more likely to drop out of high school; and
- 9 times less likely to pass the 10th grade Connecticut Academic Performance Test CAPT).
1 There are six RESCs statewide: (1) Area Cooperative Educational Services (ACES) in the New Haven area; (2) Cooperative Education Services (CES) in the Bridgeport area; (3) Capital Region Education Council (CREC) in the Hartford area; (4) EastConn in the Windham area; (5) Education Connecticut in the Litchfield area; and (6) LEARN in the Middletown and Eastern shoreline area.
2 Some of the other commonly used standardized adult literacy assessment tools are TABE (Test of Adult Basic Education) and ABLE (Adult Basic Learning Examination), both of which are scored using grade-level equivalents.
3 See “Demographics and Economics in Connecticut,” a PowerPoint presentation prepared by OWC, March 2006.