Keypoints
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS IN
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
- Economic growth can be linked to targeted
investments in transportation infrastructure
- It is essential to the state's economic
vitality to have a high performing transportation system by ensuring
adequate maintenance of the existing infrastructure and by providing
adequate capacity
- The state's connection to the global
marketplace plays an increasingly vital role in the state's economic success
- Regional input is required but the planning
process is largely dominated by federal and ConnDOT funding priorities
- An emphasis on regional fairness and regional
preference can sometimes diminish ConnDOT's ability to address critical
statewide needs
- The main focus of ConnDOT's investments is on
maintaining the system
- A lack of funding for on-going operating
costs of alternative transportation options, such as transit, can affect the
project selection process
- The potential economic impacts of alternative
development scenarios are either not calculated or considered in ConnDOT's
planning process and the planning outcomes tend to focus on fiscal impacts
- Neither DECD nor ConnDOT have systematically
considered the relationship between transportation investments and the
strategic economic needs of the state
- Coordination between ConnDOT and DECD is
mostly on a project-by-project basis
- The main revenue engine for the state's
transportation fund is the motor fuel tax, which accounts for about 56
percent of the fund's revenues; this tax has been cut three times over the
last four years
- Overall capital expenditures and state
bonding for transportation declined in the last eight years
Return to Year 2000 Studies