* The purpose of the study is to identify ways to strengthen and systematize the availability and use of performance measurement information in the General Assembly.

* The basic elements of a performance measurement system involve: developing a plan that defines an agency's objectives and the strategies and resources to meet the objectives; identifying measurable performance indicators; collecting and verifying the accuracy of the performance data; analyzing and reporting the data; and using the performance data to make decisions.

* The study identifies two basic performance measurement models:

• "special review model" -- involves performance data being collected and analyzed by a central authority empowered to make recommendations directly to agencies and the legislature.
• "performance based budgeting model" -- involves the systematic identification and collection of performance data, which are then incorporated into the regular budget process.

* Connecticut already has statutes requiring all the key elements of a performance measurement system such as: the development of a long-range vision for the state; agency strategic plans; agency performance measures; and progress reports.

*  A 1998 consultant's report done for the Office of the State Comptroller indicated Connecticut's performance measurement system contributed little of value to:

• managing agencies and programs;
• evaluating agency operations and programs; and
• analyzing agency and program budgets.

*  A 1998 legislative task force study found Connecticut had some performance auditing mechanisms in place, but such mechanisms were not implemented uniformly across state agencies in an on-going manner. The task force recommended a performance review division be established in the Office of Legislative Management.

*  If Connecticut is to have a successful performance measurement system, there must be a commitment to the system by executive and legislative leaders.

*  Two events external to state government are likely to put pressure on Connecticut to implement a performance measurement system:

• the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, which is being phased in, is expected to force federal agencies to require state agencies receiving federal funds to provide performance data; and
• the Government Accounting Standards Board is thought to be ready to begin asking states and municipalities to report on performance activities and results.

1. assign responsibility to a special entity external to the legislature such as a permanent special commission or the comptroller's office; or
2. modify the existing legislative structure by:

• creating a new legislative staff office with responsibility for overseeing a performance measurement system;
• expand the mandates and resources of the state auditors or program review committee to include overseeing a performance measurement system; or
• expand the mandates and resources of the Office of Fiscal Analysis and reorganize the budget process.