Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee
Keypoints
January 25, 2000
Connecticut
Sheriffs System
Keypoints
Ø Sheriffs Duties
· provide courthouse security
· transport prisoners
· operate cell block areas for prisoners at courthouses
· serve process
Ø Current Structure of the Sheriffs System
· based on out-of-date geographical areas rather than the location of facilities
· financed by annual General Fund appropriation
· lacks clear lines of authority
· employees must meet minimum criteria, but hiring left up to individual high sheriffs
· training of appointees increasing but still less than correctional and police officers
Ø Questions to be Resolved
· Which structure is best for delivering services currently provided by sheriffs?
Answer is based on philosophic approach and depends on importance attributed to specific elements of different alternatives
· Should one entity continue to provide all of the services, or would it be better to split up the functions among different agencies?
Which agencies would best be able to carry out the required court security functions?
Options: Sheriffs, Judicial Department, Department of Correction, or Department of Public Safety
Who should be authorized to perform service of process?
Options: Sheriffs, individuals appointed by a state authority, indifferent persons, state employees, individuals who register with governmental body, or combination of parties
Which functions need to stay together?
Option 1: [Courthouse Security + Cell Block + Prisoner Transportation + Process]
Option 2: [Courthouse Security + Cell Block + Prisoner Transportation] [Process]
Option 3: [Courthouse Security + Cell Block] [Prisoner Transportation] [Process]
Option 4: [Courthouse Security] [Cell Block + Prisoner Transportation] [Process]
Option 5: [Courthouse Security + Process] [Cell Block + Prisoner Transportation]
Ø Considerations for Court Security Functions
· level of court activity
· desire for consistent policies statewide
· continuity of custody of prisoners
· skill requirements of jobs
· costs
Ø Considerations for Service of Process Function
· purpose is to give notice lawsuit is commencing
· term also used by some to include actions such as post-judgment writs and garnishments, landlord/tenant issues, and tax collections
· fee-for-service payment system
· activities involved require flexibility
· geographic limits
Ø Qualification Elements for Court Security Workers and Process Servers
· age and citizenship
· education and experience
· health and stamina
· background and criminal record
· skills (including driver’s license)
· bonds and insurance
Ø Sheriffs System
· if continued, clarify roles of Sheriffs’ Advisory Board, Office of the County Sheriffs, and Council of High Sheriffs
Estimated Staffing Levels and State Costs of Major Options |
||||
|
|
Sheriffs
System |
Judicial
Branch |
Department
of Correction |
Department
of Public Safety |
|
Courthouse Security |
480 FTE $18 Million ($21.6 M if receive full benefits) |
508 FTE $26.7 Million |
508 FTE $26.3 Million |
508 FTE $26.4 Million |
|
Prisoner Transportation |
110 FTE $4.7 Million
($5.6 Million if receive full benefits) |
116 FTE $6.1 Million |
81 FTE $4.2 Million |
116 FTE $6 Million |
|
Cell Block (includes 24-hour lock-ups in Hartford and New Haven) |
228 FTE $9 Million
($10.8 M if receive full benefits) |
241 FTE $12.7 Million |
174 FTE $8.8 Million |
241 FTE $12.6 Million |
|
Service of Process |
245 self-employed; part-time supervision by high sheriffs
~$100,000 |
130 FTE
$6.5 Million (but may be offset by potential revenue of ~$10Million) |
2 FTE ~$175,000 |
2 FTE ~$175,000 |
|
FTE
= full-time equivalent Detailed
calculations contained in: Program Review and Investigations
Committee, Options and Staff Recommendations, (January 25,
2000). |
||||