Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee
Connecticut
Sheriffs System
Chapter IV
Chapter Four
Other Approaches
The roles and responsibilities of sheriffs in Connecticut differ from their counterparts in many other states because of the absence of county government here. In order to understand these differences, this chapter contains information about the operations of sheriffs' departments in other states. It also contains information about alternative mechanisms used to perform the functions currently provided by sheriffs in Connecticut.
Sheriffs' Departments
Sheriffs exist in every state except Alaska. In 47 states, sheriffs are elected. In Hawaii, the chief justice appoints the sheriffs, while in Rhode Island, the governor appoints sheriffs for each county. Sheriffs have criminal law enforcement responsibilities in most states.
The U.S. Department of Justice recently issued the results of its fourth survey of sheriffs departments throughout the country.[1] The results do not identify specific jurisdictions, but some of the data are grouped into categories such as staff size or population of the community served.
The preliminary data from the 1997 survey indicated the sheriffs' departments that responded to the survey employed approximately 263,000 workers full time. About two-thirds of these employees were sworn personnel. Nineteen percent of the latter were racial and ethnic minorities.
Nearly all of the sheriffs' departments surveyed had law enforcement responsibilities. Ninety-eight percent performed routine patrol services, 91 percent investigated crimes, 85 percent had drug enforcement responsibilities, and 84 percent enforced traffic laws.
Nearly all of the departments also performed some court-related functions. Overall, 98 percent served civil process, and 95 percent performed court security duties. Eighty percent of the sheriffs' departments operated a jail.
In 1997, 11 percent of the sheriffs' departments required applicants to have completed at least some college course work, while 1 percent required a four-year degree and 7 percent a two-year degree. Other screening procedures used by more than 90 percent of the departments were criminal record checks, background investigations, and medical exams. Three-quarters also required psychological exams, and 59 percent used physical agility tests. The classroom and field work requirement for new deputies averaged 900 hours combined. Three-quarters of the departments also had in-service training requirements, with an annual median of 20 hours.
Starting salaries ranged from $19,400 to $30,200; the national average was $26,000. Nearly half of the departments authorized collective bargaining.
In the full report on the 1993 survey, only 10 percent of the full-time officers working for sheriffs’ departments with 100 or more sworn personnel had courtroom functions. Only 6 percent of the departments operated lock-up facilities with limited holding times.
In December 1996, the
Connecticut Office of Legislative Research prepared a report describing some of
the characteristics of the operations of the sheriffs' departments in the other
five New England states. Table IV-1
summarizes that information.
|
TABLE IV-1. Overview
of Sheriffs in the Other New England States. |
|||
|
State |
Terms
of Office |
Functions |
Appointments |
|
Maine |
constitutional
office; 16 counties; elected every 4 years |
serve
civil process; work as road dispatchers and jail guards; provide law
enforcement in areas without local police |
may
appoint chief deputy to act in absence of sheriff; other deputies and
staff hired as county employees |
|
Mass. |
statutory
office; 14
counties; elected every 6 years |
perform
civil duties (mostly transportation of prisoners and attendance at
court sessions); do not
handle criminal work or investigations |
must
appoint special sheriff to act in absence of sheriff; may appoint/hire
county funded deputies to perform functions |
|
New
Hampshire |
constitutional
office; 10 counties; elected every 2 years |
serve
criminal and civil process
and execute writs; investigate crimes; perform court bailiff duties |
may
appoint as many deputies as think proper, but may be limited by
county's financial appropriation; may appoint special deputies for
process-related work |
|
Rhode
Island |
gubernatorial
appointment; 5
counties; every 10
years |
execute/serve
writs; may investigate crime in the county; must attend General
Assembly and superior courts (may attend supreme court) |
may
appoint as many deputies as budget allows and as are necessary to run
department |
|
Vermont |
constitutional
office; 14
counties; 4-
year term |
preserve
the peace and suppress disorder; transport prisoners and mental
patients; execute/serve process |
may
appoint as many deputies and supporting staff as necessary (but
deputies must be approved by governor); may appoint special deputies
with approval of atty. general |
|
Source:
Office of Legislative Research, Memo 96-R-1443, December 24,
1996. |
|||
In comparing the activities of sheriffs in other states with those in Connecticut, it is important to note a key difference. Most sheriffs departments are operated by county governments. Although the Connecticut sheriffs system is still set up along county lines, the county government structure was abolished in 1960. Even before that, the system differed from the ones in other states. In a history of the Connecticut county system, Rosaline Levenson noted:
… when the first counties were established [in Connecticut], the areas to be serviced had already been divided into towns. This was in contrast to states elsewhere in the nation, where counties were originally formed to serve unincorporated areas far from centers of population and a distance from state capitals.
In other words, the Connecticut towns, regardless of size or population, from colonial times on were performing functions which generally are handled by counties elsewhere in the nation.[2]
United States Marshals
Court security in the
federal judicial system is the responsibility of the United States Marshals
Service. Deputy marshals transport
prisoners, provide courtroom security, and oversee security inside federal
courthouses. They also handle
fugitive investigations, protect federal witnesses, and oversee asset seizures.
In order to qualify as
a deputy U.S. marshal, a person must:
· be a U.S. citizen between 21 and 37 years of age;
· be in excellent physical condition;
· have a bachelor's degree or three years of responsible experience;
· pass a written test and complete an oral interview; and
·
permit a background investigation.
Individuals
selected for the service must complete a 16-week basic training program,
followed by specialized training. These
positions are federal civil service jobs.
The marshals service also uses private firms and contracted individuals to provide additional security personnel for federal buildings and courthouses. Deputy marshals perform service of process for federal cases, but mail service may also be used.
Others Transporting Prisoners
As mentioned above,
most sheriffs departments operate jails, and they are responsible for bringing
individuals held there to court. They
also may bring inmates from state facilities to court.
However, the agencies that run state correctional institutions also
transport at least some of their inmates to court.
In 1996, The
National Journal for Corrections published the results of a survey on the
transportation of prisoners to a variety of destinations.
Nearly three-quarters of the 40 U.S. systems responding to the survey
indicated they transport inmates to court.
Ten respondents brought fewer than 100 inmates a year to court, 13
brought between 100 and 500 inmates, and five brought between 800 and 3,000
inmates. Maryland brought 24,500
inmates to court. (Connecticut did
not respond to the survey.)[3]
Others Performing Service of Process
All states allow someone other than a sheriff to serve process in at least some situations. In Connecticut, the parties statutorily authorized to deliver specific documents or collect funds include constables, borough bailiffs, local and state police officers, employees of the state collection agency, investigators employed by Department of Social Services or Department of Administrative Services, and support services investigators of the Superior Court.
In many states, any
person of legal age who is not a party to a specific case can serve civil
papers. However, there may be
restrictions on receipt of a fee for this activity or on the volume of activity
performed within a one-year period. (For
example, California requires anyone who serves 10 or more services of process in
one year for compensation to register with a county clerk.)
A few states have
established formal programs for individuals wishing to serve process for a fee.
Nevada and Oklahoma both issue "licenses," but the system in
the latter state is closer to registration.
Arizona, California, and Washington all have registration programs, where
individuals wishing to serve process must meet certain criteria and register
with the county court. New York City also requires process servers to be
licensed, but exempts attorneys admitted to practice in the state.
Table IV-2 summarizes information about the programs in those six
localities.
In most of the rest of
the country, judges and courts can designate individuals to serve process.
This can be done for a particular case, or a person may be granted the
right to serve papers for a particular period of time.
Appendix D summarizes who is eligible to serve process in each of the 50
states and the District of Columbia.
In addition to personal
service of process, two other methods may be used to execute some types of
service of process. They are the
U.S. mail and publication in a newspaper. Depending
on the state, notices and other documents may be sent via first class,
certified, or registered mail. Return
receipt with delivery restricted to the addressee may be required.
|
TABLE
IV-2. Localities
With Registration or Licensure Programs for Process Servers. |
|||||
|
Locality |
Authority |
Program |
Entities
Involved |
Fees |
Requirements |
|
Ariz. |
Ariz.
Rules of Civil Procedure of Supreme Court, Rule 4(e) |
Registration
as private
process server 3-year
term |
Supreme
Court sets rules and county court administers; apply to clerk and get
approval from presiding judge |
approx.
$180 |
Resident
of state for 1 year; background check (including fingerprints); pass
written exam; agree to faithfully serve process [fee
waived for sheriffs] |
|
Calif. |
Business
and Professions Code,
Sections 22350-22360 |
Registration
as process
server [if
serve 10+ process in one year for money] 2-year
term |
Clerk
of county of one's residence or principal place of business |
$100
fee + actual
cost of fingerprint check
and ID must
post $2,000 bond +$7 filing fee |
Resident
of state for 1 year; not been convicted of a felony; submit to
fingerprint check; agree to faithfully serve process [exempt
private investigators and their employees, others appointed by court,
and attorneys and their
employees] |
|
Nev. |
Nevada
Revised Statutes, Chapter 648 |
Licensure
as process
server 1-year
term |
Five-member
Private Investigator's Licensing Board (in the Office of the Attorney
General) |
$50
for application + cost of background investigation ($750 deposit
required) + $100
for exam annual
fee: $360 |
U.S.
citizen or lawful resident, 21+, good moral character; not been
convicted of felony, crime of moral turpitude, or possession of
dangerous weapon; 2 years experience as process server (or
equivalent); pass written exam; attend oral hearing Maintain
liability insurance (or self-insure) for $200,000 |
|
New
York City |
NA |
Licensure
as process
server
-- two types: organization
and individual [if
serve 5+ process in one year] 2-year
max.; all licenses expire in even years |
New
York City Department of Consumer Affairs (Licensing Center) |
$50
fee for fingerprint check upon application + pro
rated initial license fee (depends on date of approval) biennial
fee: $340
|
Citizen
or authorized to work in U.S.; photo ID; submit fingerprints for
background check (conviction not automatic denial, but failure to
reveal is grounds for denial); completed application,
questionnaire, and notarized Child Support Certification Form Maintain
bound registry ledger [exempt
NY attorneys] |
|
Okla. |
Okla.
statutes Sec.
12-158.1 |
Licensure
as private
process server
(for
civil cases) 1-year
term initially; single county renewal one year, but statewide three
years |
Administrative
Office of the Court prescribes application form; presiding judge of
judicial administrative district or other county judge issues license;
court clerks handle renewals |
Initially: $35
for one county or $150
statewide + prescribed
fees Renewal:
$5 one county + $10 each added county or
$15 statewide |
18+;
good moral character; and ethically and mentally fit Must
appear qualified and cannot have any protests pending -- clerk gives
five days notice of a hearing by posting notice in courthouse and
mailing copy to district attorney, sheriff, and chief of police or
marshal in the county seat Maintain
$5,000 bond |
|
Wash. |
Revised
Code of Wash., 18.180.010 - 18.180.030 |
Registration
as process
server 1-year
term |
Auditor
of county of residence or principal place of business |
Variable,
but most in $10 - $20 range |
Must
comply with general state requirements for businesses (e.g.,
registration of company name and payment of taxes) [exempt
sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, marshals, constables, govt. employees
acting in course of their
business, attorneys and their employees if not serving process on fee
basis, people appointed by court, employees of registrants, and people
not receiving fee] |
|
Sources
of data: Statutes, rules
of practice, court rules, and web sites of individual states as well
as telephone conversations with staff in administering agencies in
Arizona and Nevada. |
|||||
[1]
Surveys were conducted in 1987, 1990,
1993, and 1997. The results
from the most recent survey are summarized in
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Executive Summary: Sheriffs'
Departments 1997, (NCJ-1179011) October 1999.
The full report is due out in early 2000.
[2] Rosaline Levenson, County Government in Connecticut - Its History and Demise, Institute of Public Service, University of Connecticut, January 1966, p. 72.
[3]
The National Journal
for Corrections, “Doing Time in
the 1990s: Places to Go, People to See,”
Corrections Compendium, March
1996.