Connecticut
Medicaid Managed Care Council

Legislative Office Building Room 3000, Hartford CT 06106
(860) 240-0321 Info Line (860) 240-8329 FAX (860) 240-8307
www.cga.state.ct.us/ph/medicaid

 


Meeting Summary: January 16, 2004

Chair:  Senator Toni Harp

(Next meeting:  February 20, 2004)

Present:  Sen. Toni Harp (Chair), Rep. Vickie Nardello, Rep. David McCluskey, David Parrella, Rose Ciarcia (DSS), Dr. Ardell Wilson (DPH), Ellen Andrews, Dr. Leonard Banco, Dr. Wilfred Reguero, Dr. Edward Kamens, Jeffrey Walter, Janice Perkins, Henry Goldstein, Dr. Alex Geertsma, Dorothy Allen.

Also present:  Maria Cerino (ACS), Mark Scapellati (CHNCT), Paula Smyth (Anthem BCFP), Douglas Hayward (Preferred One), Deb Poeria (SBHC), Jody Rowell (Child Guidance Clinics), MA Lee for Judith Solomon.

 

Department of Social Services

HUSKY Program Update

·             The notice for the release of the RFP for the contract for the external quality review organization (EQRO) has been published in the newspaper.  Decisions will be made by the end of March. (CMS allowed the State a year to re-contract for the EQRO.  There was no EQRO oversight for the HUSKY program during this time).

·             The Dental Administrative Organization (ASO) evaluation committee will meet February 5 to begin scoring the bids submitted for the dental ASO contract.

·             Three of the HUSKY plans (CHNCT, Health Net, FirstChoice/Preferred One) have signed a contract extension through September 30, 2004.  Anthem BCFP signed the contract through June 30, 2004.

·             The legislature, three State agencies and OPM continue to discuss the Behavioral Health Partnership. (Meetings are now scheduled for Jan 30 (issues -UM, QA, evidenced-based practices), Feb 10 (Mercer Report) and Feb 26 (issues- rates/reimbursements), all meetings are at 2 PM in LOB RM 1D).

·             BH Pharmacy issues were discussed with the BH work group and Sen. Harp on Jan 12. Short-term initiatives were identified to relieve some of the administrative burdens (i.e. standardizing the Prior Authorization forms, creating a “quick-look” reference for BH prior authorization drugs that are on/off formulary).  The DSS stated the agency is considering moving to a single formulary for the HUSKY program by October 1, 2004.

 

The Department was asked to comment on the status of the legislative changes (PA 03-3, Sec 43) to the State Assistance (SAGA) program, which capped the funding for this state-based program but retained service entitlement.  Medical services will be provided through hospitals, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) or other primary care provider specified by the DSS Commissioner.  The current status of the service components was reviewed.

·             The hospital inpatient/outpatient program funding has been established at $46.5 M/year, compared to FY04 cost estimates of $59.6M. DSS policy for hospitals, effective January 1, 2004 can be found at: www.ctmedicalprogram.com/bulletin/pb03_124.pdf. .  Aggregate monthly allotments to hospitals total $3.875M; the DSS will adjust payments to ensure the aggregate payment is within the cap. There is also a process that ensures that payments for retroactively eligible recipients are not claimed against the annual SAGA hospital medical appropriation.  

·             The development of the community component is in progress. The DSS is talking with CHNCT about the provision of a managed care model for the SAGA program. The community service details are not complete, however the capped funding will result in reductions in FQHC and pharmacy reimbursements along with hospital-based services.

 

Council questions/comments related to SAGA:

Ø      Will the distressed hospital funding increase offset some of the losses from the capped SAGA funding?  Most hospitals that provide SAGA services meet the distressed hospital definition. Mr. Parrella stated that while the DSS can apply appropriations to increase that part of the Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) pool to hospitals in communities with large uninsured populations, this would not offset the full impact of SAGA capped funding. Reimbursement changes require a Medicaid State plan amendment that must be approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) before implementation. There will be a lag time in applying this legislative mandate and at least 3-4 months to see the impact of the DSH increase on hospital SAGA losses.

Ø      Legislation requires DSS to include the SAGA program into an 1115 HIFA waiver: would this add dollars for hospital services?  The DSS stated there is no promise of additional dollars, however the State would receive a federal match for Medicaid services that are now provided in a state-only program.  Under an 1115 waiver, the SAGA program would be restored to a Medicaid-like program (which would preclude funding or enrollment caps).

Ø      The congressional Medicare bill included a mandate to include $250M in each FFY going forward from FFY 05-08 to provide states with a percentage of the money ($167M) based on the 2000 decennial census. In addition to these allotments, $83M would be given to each of the 6 states with the highest number of undocumented alien apprehensions for each FFY. These dollars are expected to be included in the FFY 05 budget, not yet released.  The provisions can be found on www.thomas.loc.gov, PA 108-173, Title X, subtitle B, federal reimbursement of undocumented aliens (information provided by OFA after the Council meeting).

Ø      Can FQHCs receive DSH dollars, as these clinics are in underserved areas, provide care to the uninsured and cannot turn anyone away that seeks health services?  While FQHCs receive cost-based reimbursement, this does not cover 100% of uninsured costs.  The Social Security Act provided DSH payments only for hospitals.  The 2003 CT legislation limited the SAGA dollars for hospitals and community care; the DSS does not have another funding pool to add dollars to community services.

Ø      The DSS agreed to provide the Council with a list of pending/implemented Medicaid State Plan amendments.

 

 Current HUSKY MCO Rates

The Council had requested the DSS provide information on the new MCO rates for the contract extension, including the dollar differences in the rate cells for SFY 03-04.  The DSS presented this information, noting that the Medicaid Managed Care Regulations, effective 8/13/03 require rates to be certified as being actuarially sound.  The Upper Payment Limits, based on a state’s FFS rates, no longer determine the rate range.  William Mercer, Inc did the analysis and certification of the rates.  Mercer considered the following factors in the analysis:

·             Encounter database expenditures for the base period 1/1/01-6/30/02.

·             MCO Financial reports

·             Legislative program changes that included elimination of optional services, pharmacy and outpatient co-payments. A yearly base deduction was calculated, taking into consideration the amount paid and utilization changes.

·             Annualized trending

 

Mercer developed a rage of rates that were approved by CMS as actuarially sound:

·             Lower bound of rate range = $167.92

·             Upper bound of rate range=$187.85

 

The DSS then presented the MCOs with a dollar amount within this range that was eventually agreed upon by the MCO after negotiation. The rate cells are based on age, sex and county. Aggregate statewide rates, which were increased by 4%, are shown below:

 

 

Age

SFY 03 statewide rates

SFY 04 Statewide rates

Statewide Dollar Difference

< 1 year

$593.18

$616.91

$23.73

1-14 years

109.33

113.70

4.37

15-39 Male

137.21

142.70

5.49

15-39 Female

227.91

237.03

9.12

40 plus years Male

249.67

259.66

9.99

40 plus years Female

239.69

249.28

9.59

TOTAL

170.98

177.82

6.84 (4% increase)

 

HUSKY rates are assigned by age and county rather than risk-adjusted for special populations.  The rank order of counties from highest county rate to lowest are: Tolland, Middlesex, Litchfield, Hartford, New London, New Haven, Windham and Fairfield.  The Windham county rate of $169.97 is $1.01 less than the average statewide rate, whereas Fairfield County rate of $158.19 is $12.79 less.

 

Discussion/comments:

Ø      The county rate system may not be appropriate for CT, as members may actually use services in other counties (i.e. special care in Hartford, New Haven areas); however the rates are based on where the enrolled member lives, not based on services. Risk adjusted Medicaid rates are becoming more common in other states.  The DSS noted that the council and the legislature may consider Medicaid risk adjusted rates for FY 05-06, with recommendations to DSS, which makes the rate configuration decisions.  However, any risk adjustment would greatly change the individual MCO rates, depending upon their percentage of the risk-adjusted populations.

Ø      MCO rates have been increased yearly since 1996; however there does not seem to be any provisions to ensure that practitioner rates increase commensurate with the MCO rate increases.  The DSS stated that the MCO and practitioner determine provider rates in contracts; the DSS does not set provider rates in Medicaid Managed Care.  The DSS does monitor access issues, based on their contract provisions with the DSS and MCOs (i.e. MCO network provider capacity reports).

Ø      The cell rate increase for ages 1-14 is $4.37, which may explain the lack of MCO financial incentives to expand mental health services.

Ø      Sen. Harp asked if CMS is looking to cap the dollars in Sec.1115 waiver renewals or new waivers?  Mr. Parrella noted that in the Missouri experience of expanded Medicaid eligibility, largely financed through provider taxes and state expenditures and federal match, CMS imposed a cap on the 1115 waiver. Missouri owed back federal match dollars of $1.5 B. The CMS is closely scrutinizing states’ basis for federal match dollars.  Connecticut chose not to put the ConnPace program under an 1115 waiver because CMS required that the state cap the Medicaid program expenditures, which included nursing facility expenditures.

 

HUSKY A Utilization Reports

Several reports were provided:

·             EPSDT screening and participation ratio for 2nd half 02 and 1st half 03, dental services 2nd half 02, 1st half 03 (reports are now on a semi-annual cycle rather than quarterly):

 

Service across all plans

1st Half 03

1st Half 02

2nd Half 02

1st Half 01

 

EPSDT Screens

68%

72%

78%

65%

EPSDT Participation

56%

60%

64%

58%

Preventive Dental 3-20 years

23%

22%

22%

?

Any Dental age 3-20

32%

NA in 3/03 report

30%

18.9%

 

ü      The percentage of children with any dental service has increased in 02/03, compared to the mean percentage in 00/01 that ranged at 20% and under.

ü      EPSDT screen rates have increased compared to the 2001 first 6 months, but lower than the 2002 rates; participation rates are lower than 2002, comparable to 2001 first 6 months.  The DSS was asked to present EPSDT ratio by age over time in the HUSKY program to better understand if preventive care utilization trends have changed over time.

 

·             Antidepressant Medication management report includes children newly diagnosed with depression and prescribed antidepressants and timely follow-up with 3 or more visits within 12 weeks, and medication for at least 6 months.  Of the 318 children with newly diagnosed depression and medication, 42% (132) had 3 or more follow-up visits within 12 weeks of DX, TX; 29% (91) received 180 days treatment with medication.  The DSS was asked to provide follow-up data to the BH subcommittee that identifies the level of the provider and role (i.e. Primary care provider, MH provider).

·             Pharmacy Report (see attached report from DSS) provides MCO quarterly information on the number of prescriptions/MCO, number and percentage of prior authorization (PA) requests, temporary drug supplies provided and top ten denied drugs. 

 

 

Council discussion highlights:

o       What would be the basis for not providing temporary drug supplies?  The DSS stated that for the PA requests, the pharmacy may contact the practitioner for approval to use a formulary drug and/or the scrip is not deemed urgent by the prescriber and the PA process can be followed without the temporary supply.  Also, members may leave the prescription at the pharmacy and wait for notification from their pharmacy that the script is filled.

o       According to DSS, the average time for the completion of the PA process is approximately 4 days.

o       PA drugs that are initially denied, in many cases, end up with the denial overturned.  The MCOs may want to look at this trend per most frequently denied drugs. The BH Subcommittee work group will be looking at this issue for psychotropic drugs.

o       In the clinical world, some patients do have delays in receiving prescribed drugs and do not receive a temporary supply of the drug.  The DSS stated that the MCOs are working with their Pharmacy Benefit managers to educate the local pharmacies.

o       The summary of the $1.00 pharmacy co-pay report for May through September 2003 shows that of average of the total co-pays, there is a 48% co-pay compared to 52% that are exempt under federal rules.

 

HUSKY Enrollment

The call center has received more calls probably due to questions related to the DSS letter about the HUSKY B premium changes sent out in December.  Overview of enrollment:

 

·             During the past 7 months Husky A total enrollment numbers have returned to the peak May 2003 level.

·             The adult enrollment is increasing (89,351) near the peak May numbers of 90,433. 

·             In January 2004, the child enrollment (209,705) exceeded the May 2003 enrollment (208,624).

·             HUSKY B enrollment peaked to 15,242 in October 03, followed by monthly reductions. In January, there are 14,237 children enrolled in HUSKY B (SCHIP).  Since October more HUSKY B applications are being referred to DSS for HUSKY A eligibility consideration.

 

The Council had previously requested the DSS provide information on the disposition of the 7500 children that were dis-enrolled during June/July 0f 2003 for the February meeting.

 

Other

The Council 4th Quarterly Report was accepted without change.

 

The Consumer Access Subcommittee will resume meeting on January 28, 2004

 

The Medicaid Council will meet Friday February 20, 9:30 AM in LOB RM 1D

 

 

Medicaid Managed Care Council

January 16, 2004

 

HUSKY A Pharmacy Presentation

Quarters 2 & 3  2003

 

 

 

Anthem

HUSKY A Pharmacy Report

4/1/03 – 6/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

7/1/03 – 9/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

Total # Member Months

365,219

 

364,547

 

Total # Prescriptions Filled

190,052

 

180,456

 

Number of Prescriptions filled PMPM

0.52

 

0.50

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

(Routine Review and Temporary Supplies Issued)

6,472

3.41%

5,792

3.21%

 

* Total # Requests with Temporary Supplies

2,597

1.37%

2,419

1.34%

Provider Urgent Requests Confirmed

1,148

 

1,050

 

Provider Unavailable for Confirmation

1,449

 

1,369

 

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

Approved

5,623

 

5,196

 

Denied    (follow-up action includes revising Rx)

849

0.45%

596

0.33%

 

*            Temporary Supplies does not include “One - Time” fills.


 

CHN

HUSKY A Pharmacy Report

4/1/03 – 6/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

7/1/03 – 9/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

Total # Member Months

161,960

 

158,967

 

Total # Prescriptions Filled

86,166

 

79,594

 

Number of Prescriptions filled PMPM

0.53

 

0.50

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

(Routine Review and Temporary Supplies Issued)

1,298

1.51%

976

1.23%

 

* **       Total # Requests with Temporary Supplies

1,259

1.46%

964

1.21

          Provider Urgent Requests Confirmed

12

 

17

 

          Provider Unavailable for Confirmation

1,247

 

947

 

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

Approved

42

 

62

 

Denied    (follow-up action includes revising Rx)

1,230

1.43%

906

1.14

*      Temporary Supplies does not include “One - Time” fills.

**       CHN Policy: Except for a small number of drugs that require PA, all PA requests receive a Temporary Supply.


 

Health Net

HUSKY A Pharmacy Report

4/1/03 – 6/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

7/1/03 – 9/30/03

% of Total Rx filled

Total # Member Months

325,896

 

304,465

 

Total # Prescriptions Filled

191,339

 

165,164

 

Number of Prescriptions filled PMPM

0.59

 

0.54

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

(Routine Review and Temporary Supplies Issued)

4,716

2.46%

3,528

2.14%

 

* Total # Requests with Temporary Supplies

1,710

0.89%

916

0.82%

Provider Urgent Requests Confirmed

1,488

 

893

 

Provider Unavailable for Confirmation

222

 

23

 

 

Total # Prior Authorization (PA) Requests

Approved

3,818

 

2,176

 

Denied    (follow-up action includes revising Rx)

785

0.41%

1,352

0.82%

 

*            Temporary Supplies does not include “One - Time” fills.


 

 

Preferred One

HUSKY A Pharmacy Report *

4/1/03 – 6/30/03

7/1/03 – 9/30/03

Total # Member Months

52,156

60,260

Total # Prescriptions Filled

19,402

27,341

Number of Prescriptions filled PMPM

0.37

0.45

 

 

 

* Preferred One does not use a formulary.


Summary

 

 

 

4/1/03 – 6/30/03

7/1/03 – 9/30/03

 

# Member Months

Rx Filled

Filled Rx PMPM

PA Denied

%

Denied

# Member Months

Rx Filled

Filled Rx PMPM

PA Denied

%

Denied

Anthem

365,219

190,052

.52

849

0.45%

364,547

180,456

.50

596

0.33%

CHN

161,960

86,166

.53

1,230

1.43%

158,967

79,594

.50

906

1.14%

Health Net

325,896

191,339

.59

785

0.41%

304,465

165164

.54

1,352

0.82%

Total

853,075

467,557

 

2,864

 

827,979

425,214

 

2,854

 

Average

 

 

0.54

 

0.613%

 

 

0.51

 

0.671%

 

 

 


Top Ten Denied Drugs

Anthem September 30, 2003 - Third Quarter

                                                Authorization Reviews Completed This Quarter               Reason for Denial

 

 

Brand Name of Drug

Therapeutic Class

Total

Approved

Denied

Percent Approved

Percent Denied

Temp. Supply

Step

Therapy

Criteria

Not Met

 

Quantity Limits Exceeded

Equally Effective Alternative on Formulary

1

Zyrtec

AH - NS

400

292

108

73.00%

27.00%

50

 

 

108

2

Ortho Evra

CC-TD

148

54

94

36.49%

63.51%

27

 

 

94

3

Lexapro

SSRI

162

86

76

53.09%

46.91%

42

 

 

76

4

Ambien

NB - GRM

83

21

62

25.30%

74.70%

20

 

 

62

5

Elidel

MI - T

134

75

59

55.97%

44.03%

46

 

 

59

6

Patanol

OA

66

24

42

36.36%

63.64%

22

 

39

3

7

Advair Diskus

AC

140

102

38

72.86%

27.14%

20

 

38

 

8

Bactroban

AB - T

154

117

37

75.97%

24.03%

49

37

 

 

9

Prevacid

PPI

78

41

37

52.56%

47.44%

22

 

 

37

10

Macrobid

U - AI

61

24

37

39.34%

60.66%

9

 

 

37

 


Top Ten Denied Drugs

Anthem June 30, 03 – Second Quarter

                                                Authorization Reviews Completed This Quarter               Reason for Denial

 

Brand Name of Drug

Therapeutic Class

Total

Approved

Denied

Percent Approved

Percent Denied

Temp. Supply

 

Quantity Limits Exceeded

Equally Effective Alternative on Formulary

1

Zyrtec

AH - NS

789

537

252

68.06%

31.94%

114

 

252

2

Patanol

CC-TD

218

56

162

25.69%

74.31%

54

141

21

3

Ortho Evra

SSRI

147

52

95

35.37%

64.63%

24

 

95

4

Clarinex

NB - GRM

171

96

75

56.14%

43.86%

24

 

75

5

Elidel

MI - T

156

88

68

56.41%

43.59%

47

 

68

6

Allegra

OA

231

168

63

72.73%

27.27%

27

 

63

7

Lexapro

AC

111

51

60

45.95%

54.05%

23

 

60

8

Ambien

AB - T

70

18

52

25.71%

74.29%

25

 

52

9

Paxil CR

PPI

76

32

44

42.11%

57.89%

16

 

44

10

Allegra-D

U - AI

100

65

35

65.00%

35.00%

26

 

35

Anthem Therapeutic Class Code

Antihistamines - Non-Sedating                         AH – NS                        Adrenergic Combinations      AC

Combination Contraceptives – Transdermal                 CC-TD                   Antibiotics – Topical          AB -T

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (Ssris             SSRI                           Proton Pump Inhibitors            PPI

Non-Benzodiazepine - Gaba-Receptor Modulators  NB – GRM                     Urinary Anti-Infectives          U - AI

Macrolide Immunosuppressants – Topical          MI – T                         Decongestant & Antihistamine      DC - AH

Ophthalmic Antiallergic                                       OA           


Top Ten Denied Drugs

CHN – September 30, 2003 - Third Quarter

                                                Authorization Reviews Completed This Quarter               Reason for Denial

 

Brand Name of Drug

Therapeutic Class

Total

Approved

Denied

Percent Approved

Percent Denied

Temp. Supply

 

Equally Effective Alternative Formulary

1

Prevacid Cap 30 Mg

PPI

156

146

10

93.59%

6.41%

146

146

2

Patanol Sol 0.1% Op

OA

136

133

3

97.79%

2.21%

133

133

3

Elocon Cream 0.1%

TD

113

104

9

92.04%

7.96%

104

104

4

Protonix Tab 40mg

PPI

88

79

9

89.77%

10.23%

79

79

5

Ultracet Tab 37.5-325

NN - A

79

71

8

89.87%

10.13%

71

71

6

Bextra Tab 20 Mg

C2 - I

58

51

7

87.93%

12.07%

51

51

7

Strattera Cap 40

PT

50

30

20

60.00%

40.00%

30

30

8

Strattera Cap 25

PT

30

22

8

73.33%

26.67%

22

22

9

Aldara Cream 0.5%

TD

25

21

4

84.00%

16.00%

21

21

10

Percocet Tab 5-325mg

NA

26

21

5

80.77%

19.23%

21

21

  

 

 


Top Ten Denied Drugs

CHN –June 30, 2003– Second Quarter

                                                Authorization Reviews Completed This Quarter               Reason for Denial

 

Brand Name of Drug

Therapeutic Class

Total

Approved

Denied

Percent Approved

Percent Denied

Temp. Supply

 

Equally Effective Alternative Formulary

1

Patanol Sol 0.1% Op

OA

307

290

17

94.46%

5.54%

290

307

2

Prevacid Cap 30mg Dr

PPI

169

147

22

86.98%

13.02%

147

169

3

Elidel Cream 1%

TD

147

131

16

89.12%

10.88%

131

147

4

Protonix Tab 40mg

PPI

126

100

26

79.37%

20.63%

100

126

5

Ultracet Tab 37.5-325

NN - A

92

84

8

91.30%

8.70%

84

92

6

Elocon Cream 0.1%

TD

91

76

15

83.52%

16.48%

76

91

7

Skelaxin Tab 400mg

AS

67

61

6

91.04%

8.96%

61

67

8

Prevacid Cap 15mg Dr

PPI

52

44

8

84.62%

15.38%

44

52

9

Bextra Tab 20mg

C2 - I

48

41

7

85.42%

14.58%

41

48

10

Strattera Cap 40mg

PT

44

37

7

84.09%

15.91%

37

44

CHN Therapeutic Class Code

Proton Pump Inhibitor                       PPI                              Psychiatric Tx                                                PT

Opthalmic Anti Allergen              OA                              Topical Derm                                                 TD

Topical Derm                                     TD                               Narcotic Analgesic                                       NA

Non-Narcotic Analgesic                   NN – A                     Antispasmodic                                             AS

Cox 2 Inhibitor                                   C2 – I                         

 


Top Ten Denied Drugs

HN –June 30, 2003– Second Quarter

                                                Authorization Reviews Completed This Quarter               Reason for Denial

 

Brand Name of Drug

Therapeutic Class

Total

Approved

Denied

Percent Approved

Percent Denied

Temp. Supply

 

Inappropriate Diagnosis

Lack of Info.

1

Clarinex 5mg Tablet

AH

143

81

62

56.64%

43.36%

1

21

13

2

Zyrtec 10mg Tablet

AH

150

95

55

63.33%

36.67%

1

11

14

3

Ambien 10mg Tablet

SH - NB

62

22

40

35.48%

64.52%

2

12

4

4

Singulair 10mg Tablet

LRA

92

54

38

58.70%

41.30%

1

16

5

5

Singulair 5mg Tablet Chew

LRA

101

64

37

63.37%

36.63%

0