Sec. 32-56. (Formerly Sec. 32-9a). Defense conversion. Determination by commissioner of severe impact of defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense plant closure on a municipality. (a) In view of the contemplated reduction in
defense expenditures by the federal government and the fact that Connecticut ranks first
in the nation on a per capita basis in defense contracts awarded, the department shall
engage special agent technologists who shall take steps to assist medium and small
manufacturers to find solutions for the problems related to defense conversion and in
executing adaptation to new technologies. Such assistance shall be made available to
medium-sized and small companies which lack sufficient resources to keep abreast of
new technologies in fields allied to their own or in entering new markets not oriented
to defense production.
(b) It is found and declared that Connecticut ranks very high among the states on
a per capita basis in the amounts of prime defense contracts awarded; that the economies
of many areas in the state and the employment opportunities offered by many businesses
in the state are heavily defense-dependent and would suffer severe adverse impacts in
the event of prime defense contract cutbacks or major aerospace or defense plant closures; that, in the event that defense-dependent areas or businesses in the state were
severely impacted by a prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense
plant closure, there would be a serious need for non-defense-related industrial and commercial development and activity in such areas or by such businesses to provide and
maintain employment and tax revenues; that private and public capital investment in
the construction, renovation, and expansion of nondefense manufacturing and other
industrial facilities will best contribute to maintaining employment and the existing tax
base and to the development of a wider-based and more balanced economy in the state;
and that the tax and other financial incentives provided by this section to encourage
such public and private investment in businesses and municipalities severely impacted
by prime defense contract cutbacks, are important and necessary applications of the
resources of the state in the exercise of its responsibility to preserve the health, safety
and general welfare in the state of its people; and therefore the necessity, in the public
interest and for the public benefit and good, of the provisions of this section is hereby
declared as a matter of legislative determination.
(c) The commissioner may determine that the economy of a municipality has been
severely impacted by a prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense
plant closure with not less than eight hundred employees. The commissioner shall make
such a determination only after a public hearing, at which hearing information shall be
submitted to support the findings required by this section.
(d) (1) In determining that a municipality has been severely impacted by a prime
defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense plant closure with not less than
eight hundred employees the commissioner shall find that (A) one or more businesses
in the municipality has experienced a cancellation of one or more prime defense contracts
or major aerospace or defense plant closure with not less than eight hundred employees,
or subcontracts entered into in connection with prime defense contracts, or a significant
reduction in prime defense contract or related subcontract awards or orders; (B) such
prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense plant closure has caused
or will cause a loss of employment opportunities in the municipality; (C) such prime
defense contract or major aerospace or defense plant closure cutback has caused or
will cause a severe adverse impact in the municipality. In making such findings the
commissioner may consider the extent to which the businesses in the municipality are,
or were at the period in time before the prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace
or defense plant closure occurred, dependent on prime defense contracts or on subcontracts related to such prime defense contracts or major aerospace or defense plant closures; the extent to which one or more prime defense contractors in the municipality
has or plans to reduce its work force or the amount of defense subcontract awards or
orders which would be performed by businesses in the municipality; the extent to which
the unemployed in the municipality are or were defense workers with specialized skills
not easily transferable to other industries; the existence of abandoned or underutilized
defense-related manufacturing facilities in the municipality; and any other factors which
the commissioner deems relevant to such finding. (2) The commissioner's determination
that a municipality is severely impacted by a prime defense contract cutback or major
aerospace or defense plant closure shall be effective for two years from the date of the
decision of the commissioner. The commissioner may renew such determination for
two additional two-year periods following a public hearing and upon making the findings
required by this subsection. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, if (A)
a military installation of the United States Department of Defense at which military
vehicle engines were produced is located in any such municipality, (B) the military
installation is closed pursuant to 10 USC 2687, and (C) the Department of Defense plans
to convey the site of said installation to said municipality, the determination by the
commissioner that the municipality is severely impacted by a prime defense contract
cutback or major aerospace or defense plant closure shall remain effective until such
conveyance and any environmental remediation of the site are completed or until such
time as the plant has been reoccupied by another business, and such determination may
be renewed for a period not exceeding two years.
(e) Any business facility located in a municipality declared by the commissioner
to be severely impacted by a prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace or
defense plant closure pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, which facility would be
a "manufacturing facility", as defined in subsection (d) of section 32-9p, but for the fact
that the facility is not in a "distressed municipality", as defined in subsection (b) of
section 32-9p, will be deemed a manufacturing facility for the purposes of sections 32-9p to 32-9s, inclusive, section 12-217e, and subdivisions (59) and (60) of section 12-81, if the purpose of the construction, expansion, renovation or acquisition of such
facility is not dependent on prime defense contracts or related subcontracts. The provisions of this section shall apply to a business facility located in a building that was
vacant on July 1, 1998, and was formerly used for defense manufacturing or as a major
aerospace or defense plant.
(f) Any municipality declared by the commissioner to be severely impacted by a
prime defense contract cutback or major aerospace or defense plant closure will be
deemed a distressed municipality under sections 8-190 and 8-195 for the purpose of
assisting non-defense-dependent projects.
(February, 1965, P.A. 348, S. 1; P.A. 73-599, S. 24; P.A. 79-230; P.A. 80-267, S. 4; P.A. 98-146, S. 4, 5; May 9 Sp.
Sess. P.A. 02-4, S. 18; P.A. 04-186, S. 24; P.A. 10-162, S. 1.)
History: P.A. 73-599 replaced Connecticut development commission with department of commerce, here referred to
as "the department" (P.A. 77-614 replaced department of commerce with department of economic development); P.A. 79-230 added Subsec. (b) re feasibility study; P.A. 80-267 replaced Subsec. (b) provisions with legislative finding and added
Subsecs. (c) to (f); Sec. 32-9a transferred to Sec. 32-56 in 1981; P.A. 98-146 amended Subsec. (e) by applying provisions
to a business facility located in a building vacant on July 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1998, and applicable to assessment
years commencing on and after October 1, 1998; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-4 amended Subsec. (d) to provide that the
commissioner may renew determinations under said subsection for two additional two-year periods, effective August 15,
2002; P.A. 04-186 amended Subsec. (d) by designating existing provisions as Subdivs. (1) and (2), changing former
Subdiv. numbers to Subpara. letters, and amending Subdiv. (2) to provide for different effective period for, and renewal
of, commissioner's determination that a municipality meeting criteria re military installation is severely impacted by prime
defense contract cutback, effective June 1, 2004; P.A. 10-162 added provisions re major aerospace or defense plant closure
as a severe adverse impact on economy of a municipality throughout, effective June 9, 2010.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 32-57. Determination by commissioner of severe impact of defense contract cutbacks on a business. The Commissioner of Economic and Community Development may determine that the employment opportunities offered by a business in the
state have been severely impacted by a prime defense contract cutback. The commissioner shall make such a determination only after a public hearing, at which hearing
information shall be submitted to support findings required by this section. In making
such determination the commissioner may require the submission by such business of
all books, records, documents, drawings, specifications, certifications and other evidentiary items which it deems appropriate. In determining that employment opportunities
offered by a business in this state have been severely impacted by a prime defense
contract cutback the commissioner shall find that:
(1) The business derives, or derived at the period of time before a prime defense
contract cutback occurred, over fifty per cent of its gross income, generated by operations
within the state, from prime defense contracts or from subcontracts entered into in connection with prime defense contracts, and a significant portion of its facilities and equipment are designed for defense production and cannot be converted to nondefense production without substantial investment;
(2) The business has suffered a cancellation of one or more prime defense contracts
or related subcontracts, or a significant reduction in prime defense contract or related
subcontract awards or orders;
(3) The business has reduced its workforce substantially, or will reduce its workforce substantially, as a result of such cancellation of prime defense contracts or related
subcontracts or of the reduction of prime defense contract or related subcontract awards
or orders.
(P.A. 80-267, S. 8; P.A. 95-250, S. 1; P.A. 96-211, S. 1, 5, 6.)
History: P.A. 95-250 and P.A. 96-211 replaced Commissioner and Department of Economic Development with Commissioner and Department of Economic and Community Development.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 32-58. Department to advise local governments. Commissioner to report
annually on defense dependency. The Department of Economic and Community Development shall advise and cooperate with any municipal or regional agency, commission or authority responsible for economic planning in order to formulate and implement
plans to reduce the dependency of a municipal or regional economy on prime defense
contracts and to alleviate the effects of a possible prime defense contract cutback. The
Commissioner of Economic and Community Development shall submit on or before
September first of each year to the Governor and the General Assembly a report which
evaluates the extent to which the economy of the state is dependent on prime defense
contracts, designates the municipalities or regions whose economies are particularly
dependent on prime defense contracts, describes the adequacy of the steps being taken
to meet potential problems resulting from such dependency and shall include recommendations as to the need for further legislative and administrative action to reduce such
dependency and to aid areas which have been or may be impacted by prime defense
contract cutbacks.
(P.A. 80-267, S. 10; P.A. 95-250, S. 1; P.A. 96-211, S. 1, 5, 6.)
History: P.A. 95-250 and P.A. 96-211 replaced Commissioner and Department of Economic Development with Commissioner and Department of Economic and Community Development.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 32-58a. Reimbursement to state residents for travel to meeting of federal
base relocation closure commission. The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management may, within available appropriations, reimburse state residents who are official
state advocates before any federal base relocation closure commission for the reasonable
expenses incurred for travel while attending meetings of said commission.
(June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 172.)
History: June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6 effective August 20, 2003.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 32-58b. Office of Military Affairs established. Duties of executive director. (a) There is established an Office of Military Affairs within the Department of
Economic and Community Development for administrative purposes only. The Office
of Military Affairs shall promote and coordinate state-wide activities that enhance the
quality of life of all branches of military personnel and their families and to expand the
military and homeland security presence in this state.
(b) The Governor, in consultation with the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development, shall appoint an executive director to manage the daily activities
and duties of the Office of Military Affairs. The executive director shall have the necessary qualifications to perform the duties of said office, including, but not limited to,
having prior military experience, and having attained the rank of an officer within a
branch of the armed forces. The Governor shall give preference to any person with the
necessary training and experience who has served in the Navy or who has knowledge
or prior experience with the federal Base Realignment and Closure or "BRAC" process.
Within available appropriations, the executive director shall: (1) Appoint, employ and
remove such assistants, employees and personnel as deemed necessary for the efficient
and effective administration of the activities of the office; (2) coordinate state and local
efforts to prevent the closure or downsizing of Connecticut military facilities, particularly United States Naval Submarine Base-New London, located in Groton; (3) maximize the state's input into the federal Base Realignment and Closure or "BRAC" process, including, but not limited to, (A) acting as liaison to the state's congressional
delegation on defense, military and BRAC issues, and (B) acting as liaison to consultant
lobbyists hired by the state to assist in monitoring activities related to BRAC; (4) encourage the relocation of military missions to the state; (5) coordinate state and local efforts
to enhance the quality of life of all branches of military personnel and their families living
or working in Connecticut; (6) review and make recommendations for state policies that
affect Connecticut's military facilities and defense and homeland security industries;
(7) coordinate state, regional and local efforts to encourage the growth of Connecticut's
defense and homeland security industry; (8) support the development of a Defense and
Homeland Security Industry Cluster; (9) establish and coordinate a Connecticut Military
and Defense Advisory Council to provide technical advice and assistance; (10) oversee
the implementation of recommendations of the Governor's Commission for the Economic Diversification of Southeastern Connecticut; and (11) prepare and submit a report
of activities, findings and recommendations annually to the Governor and the joint
standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to
commerce and public safety, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a.
(P.A. 07-205, S. 1; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-4, S. 22.)
History: June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-4 amended Subsec. (b) by requiring Governor to give preference to any person who
has served in the military "or" has knowledge or prior experience with the BRAC process, rather than requiring military
service "and" knowledge or prior experience with such process.
See Sec. 4-38f for definition of "administrative purposes only".
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 32-59. Defense readjustment task force. There is established within the Department of Economic and Community Development a defense readjustment task force
which shall consist of the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development
and the Labor Commissioner and the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management,
or their designees. The Commissioner of Economic and Community Development shall
serve as chairman. The defense readjustment task force shall advise and assist the Governor and the Department of Economic and Community Development with respect to
economic planning for any municipality or region which is or may be severely impacted
by prime defense contract cutbacks. The defense readjustment task force shall design
procedures for expedient and effective aid to businesses and their employees that are
severely impacted by prime defense contract cutbacks. Such procedures shall include,
but not be limited to: (1) Expediting unemployment claims; (2) finding alternative employment for affected employees; (3) recommending priority in such state assistance
as job training programs; and (4) technical assistance. The procedures developed by the
defense readjustment task force may be implemented at the direction of the Governor.
(P.A. 80-267, S. 11; P.A. 95-250, S. 1; P.A. 96-211, S. 1, 5, 6.)
History: P.A. 95-250 and P.A. 96-211 replaced Commissioner and Department of Economic Development with Commissioner and Department of Economic and Community Development (Revisor's note: The phrase "Commissioners of
Economic and Community Development and Labor" was changed editorially by the Revisors to "Commissioner of Economic and Community Development and the Labor Commissioner" for consistency with customary statutory usage).
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |