Sec. 53a-8. Criminal liability for acts of another.
Subsec. (a):
Trial court properly rejected defendant's claim that a defense of duress, if credited, would negate the required mental
state governing accessorial liability, specific intent and duress can coexist. 282 C. 281.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 53a-14. Duress as defense.
Trial court did not err in refusing to provide a jury instruction that would have allowed jury to factor defendant's age
into his defense of duress, independent and regardless of how defendant's age relates to age of his coercers, so as to
account for the differences in how adolescents evaluate risk. Duress defense has both subjective and objective components.
Subjective component is that defendant actually must have been coerced into the criminal action. Objective component
requires that defendant have been coerced in circumstances under which a reasonable person in his situation would have
been likewise unable to resist. 282 C. 281.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 53a-18. Use of reasonable physical force or deadly physical force generally.
Subdiv. (1):
Examining plain language of risk of injury statute, Sec. 53-21(a)(1),and this Subdiv., providing for the justification
defense of reasonable parental discipline, there is no apparent reason to bar application of Subdiv. to a charge under Sec.
53-21(a)(1). 99 CA 713.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |
Sec. 53a-19. Use of physical force in defense of person.
First person to use physical force is not necessarily the initial aggressor. Initial aggressor is the person who acts first
in a manner that creates reasonable belief in another person's mind that physical force is about to be used upon that other
person. 99 CA 736.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) | (Return to List of Chapters) | (Return to List of Titles) |