
February 14, 2008 |
2008-R-0124 | |
STATES WITH SINGLE AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH | ||
| ||
By: Robin K. Cohen, Principal Analyst | ||
You asked whether other states have a single state agency or private entity that administers their State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP, in Connecticut, HUSKY) and whether this agency “integrates” other child health programs, such as Title V. You are trying to determine whether any state has been able to coordinate children's health services in such a way that it can measure health outcomes and ensure accountability across programs.
About half of the 49 states responded to our survey. For the remaining states, we were able to use information from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to identify which entity administers SCHIP, and in some instances, the extent to which SCHIP is coordinated with Medicaid.
SUMMARY
Although the federal SCHIP law contemplates states coordinating their SCHIP programs with other public and private health insurance programs, it does not appear that states extend this coordination beyond coordination with Medicaid for children. A survey of states found that most use a single state agency to administer their SCHIP (and often Medicaid) program; a few use what appear to be quasi-public entities to do this.
We found no state that integrates all child health programs in such a way that families can get all services they need in one place with few barriers. But several states have large, umbrella health and human services agencies. While various divisions within these agencies administer different children's health programs, the fact that these programs reside in one agency may make it easier for families to access them.
CMS requires that states measure health outcomes in their Medicaid and SCHIP programs. The states responding to the survey said that their internal and external quality reviews address only those programs, not other children's health programs.
SCHIP AGENCY—COORDINATING HEALTH CARE
SCHIP regulations require state SCHIP plans to include procedures that the state uses to coordinate SCHIP with other public and private health insurance programs; sources of health benefit coverage for children; and relevant child health programs, such as Title V, that provide health care services for low-income children (42 CFR §457. 80). But our survey results suggest that such coordination is typically limited to coordination with the Medicaid program.
Table 1 lists each state, the agency that administers its SCHIP program, the extent to which the agency also administers other child health programs, and any other coordinating activities that occur.
Table 1: State Administrative Structure for SCHIP and Coordination Efforts
State |
SCHIP –State Entity |
Administers All Other Children's Health Programs |
Other Coordination Efforts and Comments |
Alabama |
Dept. of Public Health (DPH) |
No, but administers SCHIP-funded All Kids and All Kids Plus (authorized by departments of Mental Retardation, Rehabilitative Services, and University of Alabama). Separate agencies administer (1) Medicaid, (2) early intervention, and (3) child welfare. |
All Kids Plus (children with special health care needs) services provided by two different departments through contractual arrangement in which that agency, instead of DPH, pays state match. New program (Camellia) is governor's initiative to streamline application process for state health and social services programs and improve program access—still in planning stages. |
Alaska [1] |
Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Medical Assistance |
Unknown |
|
Arizona [1] |
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Systems |
Also administers Medicaid |
|
Arkansas [1] |
Division of Medical Assistance |
Unknown |
State contracts with Department of Health to provide outreach, including Help Line Service |
California [1] |
Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board |
Unknown |
|
Colorado [1] |
Department of Health Care Policy and Financing |
Unknown |
|
Delaware |
Department of Health and Social Services |
No, but separate DHS divisions administer SCHIP, Medicaid, and Title V. Separate department administers child welfare and behavioral health. |
Quality measuring occurs only across Medicaid and SCHIP, not other programs. |
Florida |
Florida Healthy Kids Corporation (private entity) |
No, state is very fragmented. For example, Medicaid eligibility and administration are done through two separate agencies. But child welfare agency is same agency determining Medicaid eligibility. |
Agency for Health Care Administration (administers Medicaid) is lead agency for receiving federal funds and dispersing to other programs and monitoring compliance with federal rules. |
Georgia [1] |
Department of Community Health |
Unknown |
State law mandates that any health care provider enrolled in Medicaid is deemed enrolled in SCHIP |
Hawaii [1] |
Department of Human Services, Med-QUEST |
Unknown |
|
Idaho [1] |
Department of Health and Welfare |
Unknown |
Department also runs Medicaid program |
Illinois [1] |
Department of Public Aid |
Unknown |
|
Indiana [1] |
Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Office of Medicaid Planning and Policy |
Unknown |
|
Iowa |
Department of Human Services |
No, but administers Medicaid. Different DHS division administers child welfare; Title V and Birth-to-Three administered by Department of Public Health |
|
Kansas |
Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, Division of Medical Policy |
No, but also oversees Medicaid. Other programs divided among four other state agencies. |
|
Kentucky [1] |
Department for Medicaid Services |
Unknown |
|
Louisiana |
Department of Health and Hospitals |
Almost. Administers Medicaid, Title V, Birth-to-Three. |
Children's Cabinet in Governor's Office |
Maine |
Department of Health and Human Services |
No, but many DHHS divisions deal with children's health, such as Center for Disease Control (Title V) |
Office of Integrated Access and Support automatically enrolls children in the richest benefits. Two agencies were consolidated into DHHS two years ago. |
Maryland [1] |
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene |
Unknown |
|
Massachusetts [1] |
Division of Medical Assistance |
Unknown |
MassHealth uses decision trees, a system that determines and automatically enrolls individual in most comprehensive coverage (we believe only for Medicaid and SCHIP) |
Michigan |
Department of Community Health |
Almost. Department administers most of child health, including Medicaid, other public health programs, mental health and wrap around services, Title V, Tribal Health Services, and Title X. |
Department website has separate page devoted to health care for children and teens, with links to programs |
Minnesota [1] |
Department of Human Services |
Unknown, but same as Medicaid |
|
Mississippi [1] |
State and Public School Employees Health Insurance Management Board |
Unknown |
|
Missouri [1] |
Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services |
Unknown, but same as Medicaid |
|
Montana |
Department of Public Health and Human Services |
Almost. Agency includes Medicaid, public health, foster care, mental health, DD services, and other public assistance |
Offices co-located at local level, to extent possible |
Nebraska [1] |
Health and Human Services System |
Unknown |
|
Nevada [1] |
Department of Human Resources |
Unknown, but joint application with Medicaid |
|
New Hampshire [1] |
Department of Health and Human Services |
Unknown, but same unit determines eligibility for Medicad |
|
New Jersey [1] |
Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance |
Unknown, but joint application (mail-in) with Medicaid |
|
New Mexico |
Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance Division |
No |
|
New York [1] |
Department of Health |
Unknown |
Common applications with Medicaid, initial screen for Medicaid eligibility, and ease in moving from one program to the other |
North Carolina [1] |
Department of Health and Human Services, State Employees Health Plan (benefits and claims processing), and local social services departments (eligibility) |
Unknown, but coordinated with Medicaid |
|
North Dakota [1] |
Department of Human Services |
Unknown |
|
Ohio [1] |
Department of Job and Family Services |
Unknown, but Department of Health helps with outreach |
|
Oklahoma [1] |
Oklahoma Health Care Authority |
Unknown |
Authority collaborates closely with other departments for marketing and outreach of SCHIP |
Oregon [1] |
Department of Human Resources, Division of Medical Assistance Programs |
Unknown, but single application for SCHIP and Medicaid |
|
Pennsylvania |
Department of Insurance |
No, state is very fragmented with Department of Welfare administering Medicaid and Health Department administering Title V. |
Health Care Cabinet meets regularly. Officials call health care “seamless” as there is web-based application for all social services that gets routed to appropriate administering agencies. |
Rhode Island [1] |
Department of Human Services |
Unknown |
|
South Carolina [1] |
Department of Health and Human Services |
Unknown |
|
South Dakota [1] |
Department of Social Services |
Unknown, but department also administers Medicaid with significant coordination of two programs |
|
Tennessee [1] |
Bureau of TennCare (Medicaid expansion); also Department of Finance and Administration, Division of Insurance Administration (separate state program) |
Unknown |
|
Texas [1] |
Health and Human Services Commission |
Unknown, but joint application with Medicaid |
|
Utah |
Department of Health |
Unknown, but initial screen of application for Medicaid eligibility |
|
Vermont |
Agency for Human Services (AHS), Office of Vermont Health Access |
No, but most publicly funded child health programs in different departments within the AHS |
State uses councils, task forces, and interagency coordinating groups with strong links to communities. State recently had a child cabinet. State and local planning are linked. |
Virginia |
Department of Medical Assistance Services |
No, only Medicaid and SCHIP. Other child health fragmented among several agencies (e. g. , Title V in Department of Health) |
All agencies have partnership agreements and established work groups that coordinate services. State is the in the process of strengthening these efforts. |
Washington |
Department of Social and Health Services, Health and Recovery Services Administration |
No, but high degree of coordination among agencies. |
Procedures in place to ensure that children known to a particular agency get access to coverage |
West Virginia [1] |
Department of Administration, Children's Health Insurance Agency; Public Employees Insurance Agency is third-party administrator |
Unknown, but same agency administers Medicaid |
|
Wisconsin [1] |
Department of Health and Family Services |
Unknown but SCHIP program (Badgercare) includes Medicaid |
|
Wyoming [1] |
Department of Health, Division of Community and Family Health |
Unknown, but joint application with Medicaid |
[1] These states did not respond to our survey. For this information we relied on Fact Sheets produced by CMS.
RC: dw