
August 2, 2005 |
2005-R-0604 | |
CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES AND CONTRIBUTIONS IN CONNECTICUT 2000-2004 | ||
| ||
By: Kristin Sullivan, Research Analyst | ||
The Institute on Money in State Politics (www. followthemoney. org) maintains campaign finance data by state, and the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) and the Office of the Secretary of the State (SOTS) maintain such information for Connecticut. This report contains statistics from these three sources on campaign expenditures and contributions in Connecticut during the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections.
Table 1 shows campaign spending by legislative candidates during the 2000 and 2004 elections (summary information on the 2002 election is not readily available). In 2000, Senate and House candidates spent on average $ 42,823 and $ 13,080, respectively, and in 2004, they spent on average $ 71,603 and $ 16,767.
Table 2 shows the amount of money that statewide and legislative candidates raised (i. e. , committee receipts) during the 2002 election. The maximum amount that a statewide office candidate raised was $ 6,582,070 and the minimum was $ 4,885. Senate and House candidates raised on average $ 49,342 and $ 15,884, respectively.
Table 3 summarizes data from the SEEC’s 2000 and 2002 General Assembly Audit Programs. It breaks down contributions to legislative candidates by committees, individuals, and other sources, and through ad books purchases. In 2002, each source equaled roughly the same percent of total contributions as it did in 2000.
Finally, Table 4 shows campaign contributions by interest group as defined and classified by the Institute on Money in State Politics. For all three election years, lawyers, lobbyists, and party affiliates (e. g. , committees or party officials) were the largest contributors proportionately.
TABLE 1: LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATE SPENDING IN THE 2000 AND 2004 ELECTIONS
Number of Committees Reporting |
Minimum Expenditures of Committees Reporting |
Maximum Reported Expenditures of Committees Reporting |
Average Expenditures of Committees Reporting |
Total Reported Expenditures | |
2000 | |||||
Senate |
57 |
$ 800 |
$ 203,745 |
$ 42,823 |
$ 2,440,896 |
House |
230 |
0 |
85,506 |
13,080 |
3,008,322 |
TOTAL |
5,449,218 | ||||
2004 | |||||
Senate |
53 |
$ 150 |
$ 213,044 |
$ 71,603 |
$ 3,723,354 |
House |
203 |
42 |
71,228 |
16,767 |
3,386,889 |
TOTAL |
7,110,243 | ||||
Source: OLR’s review of candidates’ “Statement of Receipts and Expenditures” (ED-45) filed with the SOTS (see reports 2001-R-0237 and 2005-R-0254)
TABLE 2: STATEWIDE AND LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATE RECEIPTS IN THE 2002 ELECTION
Number of Committees |
Minimum Receipts |
Maximum Receipts |
Average Receipts |
Total Receipts | |
Governor & Lt. Governor |
2 |
$ 2,392,920 |
$ 6,582,070 |
* |
$ 8,974,990 |
Secretary of the State |
3 |
108,265 |
967,673 |
* |
1,075,938 |
Comptroller |
3 |
4,885 |
748,035 |
* |
752,920 |
Attorney General |
2 |
177,398 |
432,599 |
* |
609,997 |
State Treasurer |
4 |
279,853 |
581,751 |
* |
861,604 |
Senate |
75 |
0 |
274,957 |
49,342 |
3,704,413 |
House |
299 |
0 |
91,882 |
15,884 |
4,850,183 |
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS |
20,830,045 | ||||
Sources: (1) Institute on Money in State Politics for statewide candidates and (2) SOTS
* Average receipts for statewide offices are not given because in all cases, there were only two viable, major party committees whose receipts are represented in the Minimum and Maximum columns.
TABLE 3: LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE 2000 AND 2002 ELECTIONS
2000 |
2002* | |||
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total |
Total Contributions (to audited candidates) |
Percent of Total | |
Ad Book Receipts |
||||
Senate |
$ 424,902 |
248,120 |
||
House |
589,302 |
297,850 |
||
Sub-total |
1,014,204 |
14% |
545,970 |
14% |
Committee Contributions |
||||
Senate |
1,231,370 |
706,657 |
||
House |
1,358,514 |
633,196 |
||
Sub-total |
2,589,884 |
37% |
1,339,853 |
34% |
Individual Contributions |
||||
Senate |
1,132,971 |
805,705 |
||
House |
1,986,775 |
1,062,847 |
||
Sub-total |
3,119,746 |
45% |
1,868,552 |
47% |
Other Contributions |
||||
Senate |
96,577 |
73,478 |
||
House |
183,884 |
154,465 |
||
Sub-total |
280,461 |
4% |
227,943 |
6% |
TOTAL |
7,004,295 |
100% |
3,982,319 |
100% |
Source: SEEC
* Figures represent actual contributions to 197 out of 374 legislative candidates. The SEEC estimates that the contributions to all 374 candidates, not just those that it audited, totaled $ 7,964,632.
TABLE 4: CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY INTEREST IN THE 2000, 2002, AND 2004 ELECTIONS
2000 |
2002* (includes statewide races) |
2004* | ||||
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total |
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total |
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total | |
Total contributions** è Contributor ê |
$ 8,937,281 |
100. 00 |
$ 24,603,799 |
100. 00 |
$ 11,657,529 |
100. 00 |
Party |
1,039,686 |
11. 63 |
1,766,554 |
7. 18 |
1,664,420 |
14. 28 |
§ Party Committees |
896,473 |
- |
1,454,304 |
- |
1,131,963 |
- |
§ Leadership PACs |
108,714 |
- |
226,250 |
- |
53,365 |
- |
§ Candidate Committees |
24,689 |
- |
748 |
- |
458,547 |
- |
§ Republican Officials, Candidates, and Former Members |
6,945 |
- |
63,678 |
- |
12,910 |
- |
-Continued-
2000 |
2002* (includes statewide races) |
2004* | ||||
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total |
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total |
Total Contributions |
Percent of Total | |
§ Democratic Officials, Candidates, and Former Members |
2,865 |
- |
19,600 |
- |
7,560 |
- |
§ Nonpartisan Officials, Candidates, and Former Members |
N/A |
N/A |
1,675 |
- |
N/A |
- |
§ Third-Party Officials, Candidates, and Former Members |
N/A |
N/A |
300 |
- |
75 |
- |
Lawyers & Lobbyists |
846,644 |
9. 47 |
2,322,172 |
9. 44 |
870,611 |
7. 47 |
Health |
469,479 |
5. 25 |
901,055 |
3. 66 |
409,522 |
3. 51 |
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate |
467,906 |
5. 24 |
2,259,927 |
9. 19 |
670,620 |
5. 75 |
Other/Retiree/Civil Servants |
424,642 |
4. 75 |
2,256,569 |
9. 17 |
676,384 |
5. 80 |
General Business |
387,154 |
4. 33 |
1,022,018 |
4. 15 |
301,155 |
2. 58 |
Labor |
382,895 |
4. 28 |
851,463 |
3. 46 |
520,967 |
4. 47 |
Candidate Contributions |
152,066 |
1. 70 |
400,122 |
1. 63 |
532,977 |
4. 57 |
Construction |
144,147 |
1. 61 |
1,080,174 |
4. 39 |
186,775 |
1. 60 |
Energy and Natural Resources |
129,605 |
1. 45 |
276,035 |
1. 12 |
83,420 |
0. 72 |
Communications and Electronics |
114,244 |
1. 28 |
287,473 |
1. 17 |
124,378 |
1. 07 |
Transportation |
78,840 |
0. 88 |
249,600 |
1. 01 |
85,260 |
0. 73 |
Ideology/Single Issue |
73,876 |
0. 83 |
66,570 |
0. 27 |
82,153 |
0. 70 |
Agriculture |
42,145 |
0. 47 |
87,180 |
0. 35 |
52,970 |
0. 45 |
Defense |
50 |
0. 00 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Source: Institute on Money in State Politics
N/A means not applicable
* The Institute on Money in State Politics’ data is 95% complete for election cycle.
** Contribution totals include contributions to party committees, not just candidates.
KS: dw