Sec. 54-1k. Issuance of protective orders in stalking cases. Upon the arrest of a
person for a violation of section 53a-181c, 53a-181d or 53a-181e, the court may issue
a protective order pursuant to this section. Such order shall be an order of the court, and
the clerk of the court shall cause a certified copy of such order to be sent to the victim,
and a copy of such order, or the information contained in such order, to be sent by
facsimile or other means within forty-eight hours of its issuance to the appropriate law
enforcement agency. A protective order issued under this section may include provisions
necessary to protect the victim from threats, harassment, injury or intimidation by the
defendant, including but not limited to, an order enjoining the defendant from (1) imposing any restraint upon the person or liberty of the victim, (2) threatening, harassing,
assaulting, molesting or sexually assaulting the victim, or (3) entering the dwelling of
the victim. Such order shall be made a condition of the bail or release of the defendant
and shall contain the following language: "In accordance with section 53a-223, any
violation of this order constitutes criminal violation of a protective order. Additionally,
in accordance with section 53a-107, entering or remaining in a building or any other
premises in violation of this order constitutes criminal trespass in the first degree. These
are criminal offenses each punishable by a term of imprisonment of not more than one
year, a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or both. Violation of this order also
violates a condition of your bail or release and may result in raising the amount of bail
or revoking release." The information contained in and concerning the issuance of any
protective order issued under this section shall be entered in the registry of protective
orders pursuant to section 51-5c.
(P.A. 95-214, S. 3; P.A. 02-132, S. 56.)
History: P.A. 02-132 replaced provisions re sending certified copy of order to law enforcement agency with provisions
re sending copy of or information contained in order to law enforcement agency by facsimile or other means, replaced
provisions re entry of protective orders in registry established under Sec. 46b-38c(e) with provisions re entry of information
into registry of protective orders pursuant to Sec. 51-5c and made technical changes, effective January 1, 2003.
Sec. 54-1l. Short title: Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act. (a) This
section and section 54-1m shall be known as the "Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act".
(b) For the purposes of this section, "racial profiling" means the detention, interdiction or other disparate treatment of an individual solely on the basis of the racial or
ethnic status of such individual.
(c) No member of the Division of State Police within the Department of Public
Safety, a municipal police department or any other law enforcement agency shall engage
in racial profiling. The detention of an individual based on any noncriminal factor or
combination of noncriminal factors is inconsistent with this policy.
(d) The race or ethnicity of an individual shall not be the sole factor in determining
the existence of probable cause to place in custody or arrest an individual or in constituting a reasonable and articulable suspicion that an offense has been or is being committed
so as to justify the detention of an individual or the investigatory stop of a motor vehicle.
(P.A. 99-198, S. 1; P.A. 03-160, S. 2.)
History: P.A. 03-160 inserted new Subsec. (a) providing that section and Sec. 54-1m shall be known as the "Alvin W.
Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act" and redesignated existing Subsecs. (a) to (c) as new Subsecs. (b) to (d), effective
June 26, 2003.
Sec. 54-1m. Adoption of policy prohibiting certain police actions. Data collection and reporting. (a) Not later than January 1, 2000, each municipal police department
and the Department of Public Safety shall adopt a written policy that prohibits the stopping, detention or search of any person when such action is solely motivated by considerations of race, color, ethnicity, age, gender or sexual orientation, and the action would
constitute a violation of the civil rights of the person.
(b) Commencing on January 1, 2000, each municipal police department and the
Department of Public Safety shall, using the form developed and promulgated pursuant
to subsection (h) of this section, record and retain the following information: (1) The
number of persons stopped for traffic violations; (2) characteristics of race, color, ethnicity, gender and age of such persons, provided the identification of such characteristics
shall be based on the observation and perception of the police officer responsible for
reporting the stop and the information shall not be required to be provided by the person
stopped; (3) the nature of the alleged traffic violation that resulted in the stop; (4) whether
a warning or citation was issued, an arrest made or a search conducted as a result of the
stop; and (5) any additional information that such municipal police department or the
Department of Public Safety, as the case may be, deems appropriate, provided such
information does not include any other identifying information about any person stopped
for a traffic violation such as the person's operator's license number, name or address.
(c) Each municipal police department and the Department of Public Safety shall
provide to the Chief State's Attorney and the African-American Affairs Commission
(1) a copy of each complaint received pursuant to this section, and (2) written notification
of the review and disposition of such complaint. No such complaint shall contain any
other identifying information about the complainant such as his or her operator's license
number, name or address.
(d) Any police officer who in good faith records traffic stop information pursuant
to the requirements of this section shall not be held civilly liable for the act of recording
such information unless the officer's conduct was unreasonable or reckless.
(e) If a municipal police department or the Department of Public Safety fails to
comply with the provisions of this section, the Chief State's Attorney may recommend
and the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management may order an appropriate
penalty in the form of the withholding of state funds from such department or the Department of Public Safety.
(f) On or before October 1, 2000, and annually thereafter, each municipal police
department and the Department of Public Safety shall provide to the Chief State's Attorney and the African-American Affairs Commission, in such form as the Chief State's
Attorney shall prescribe, a summary report of the information recorded pursuant to
subsection (b) of this section.
(g) The African-American Affairs Commission shall review the prevalence and
disposition of traffic stops and complaints reported pursuant to this section. Not later
than January 1, 2004, and annually thereafter, the African-American Affairs Commission shall report to the Governor, the General Assembly and to any other entity said
commission deems appropriate the results of such review, including any recommendations.
(h) Not later than January 1, 2000, the Chief State's Attorney, in conjunction with
the Commissioner of Public Safety, the Attorney General, the Chief Court Administrator, the Police Officer Standards and Training Council, the Connecticut Police Chiefs
Association and the Connecticut Coalition of Police and Correctional Officers, shall
develop and promulgate: (1) A form, in both printed and electronic format, to be used
by police officers when making a traffic stop to record the race, color, ethnicity, gender
and age of the operator of the motor vehicle that is stopped, the location of the stop, the
reason for the stop and other information that is required to be recorded pursuant to
subsection (b) of this section; and (2) a form, in both printed and electronic format, to
be used to report complaints pursuant to this section by persons who believe they have
been subjected to a motor vehicle stop by a police officer solely on the basis of their
race, color, ethnicity, age, gender or sexual orientation.
(P.A. 99-198, S. 2, 3; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-9, S. 128, 131; P.A. 03-160, S. 1; P.A. 04-27, S. 6; 04-257, S. 83.)
History: (Revisor's note: A reference in Subsec. (f) to "the information recorded pursuant to subsection (d) ... " was
changed editorially by the Revisors to "the information recorded pursuant to subsection (b) ... " for accuracy); June Sp.
Sess. P.A. 01-9 amended Subsec. (h) to extend the effectiveness of Subsecs. (f) and (g) from January 1, 2002, to January
1, 2003, effective July 1, 2001; P.A. 03-160 amended Subsec. (b)(5) to provide that additional information does not include
any other identifying information about any person stopped for a traffic violation such as his or her operator's license
number, name or address, amended Subsec. (c) to require copy of the complaint and written notification of the review and
disposition of such complaint to be provided to the African-American Affairs Commission and to provide that no such
complaint shall contain any other identifying information about the complainant such as his or her operator's license
number, name or address, amended Subsec. (f) to require that summary report be provided to the African-American Affairs
Commission, amended Subsec. (g) to require the African-American Affairs Commission to review the prevalence and
disposition of traffic stops and complaints and, not later than January 1, 2004, and annually thereafter, to report the results
of such review to the Governor, the General Assembly and any other entity said commission deems appropriate and to
delete references to the Chief State's Attorney, deleted former Subsec. (h) re limited period of effectiveness of Subsecs.
(f) and (g), redesignated existing Subsec. (i) as Subsec. (h) and amended said Subsec. by substituting reference in Subdiv.
(1) to personal identifying information with reference to race, color, ethnicity, gender and age, effective June 26, 2003;
P.A. 04-27 made technical changes, effective April 28, 2004; P.A. 04-257 made a technical change in Subsec. (b), effective
June 14, 2004.
Sec. 54-1n. Complaint by victim of identity theft. Law enforcement agency's
responsibilities. Any person who believes that such person's personal identifying information has been obtained and used by another person in violation of section 53a-129a
of the general statutes, revision of 1958, revised to January 1, 2003, or section 53a-129b, 53a-129c or 53a-129d may file a complaint reporting such alleged violation with
the law enforcement agency for the town in which such person resides. Such law enforcement agency shall accept such complaint, prepare a police report on the matter, provide
the complainant with a copy of such report and investigate such alleged violation and any
other offenses allegedly committed as a result of such violation and shall, if necessary,
coordinate such investigation with any other law enforcement agencies.
(P.A. 03-156, S. 7.)
Secs. 54-1o and 54-1p. Reserved for future use.
Sec. 54-1q. Court to advise defendant that guilty or nolo contendere plea may
have consequence of suspension of driver's license. The court shall not accept a plea
of guilty or nolo contendere from a person in a proceeding with respect to a violation
of section 14-110, subsection (b) or (c) of section 14-147, section 14-215, subsection
(a) of section 14-222, subsection (a) or (b) of section 14-224 or section 53a-119b unless
the court advises such person that conviction of the offense for which such person has
been charged may have the consequence of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles suspending such person's motor vehicle operator's license.
(P.A. 03-233, S. 3.)
Sec. 54-2. Conviction and binding over by trial justice. Section 54-2 is repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8725; 1957, P.A. 522, S. 2; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 204.)
Sec. 54-2a. Issuance of bench warrants of arrest, subpoenas, capias and other
criminal process. Release conditions. Service of court process. Entry of warrants
into computer system. (a) In all criminal cases the Superior Court, or any judge thereof,
or any judge trial referee specifically designated by the Chief Justice to exercise the
authority conferred by this section may issue (1) bench warrants of arrest upon application by a prosecutorial official if the court or judge determines that the affidavit accompanying the application shows that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has
been committed and that the person complained against committed it, (2) subpoenas for
witnesses, (3) capias for witnesses and for defendants who violate an order of the court
regarding any court appearance, and (4) all other criminal process; and may administer
justice in all criminal matters.
(b) The court, judge or judge trial referee issuing a bench warrant for the arrest of
the person or persons complained against shall, in cases punishable by death or life
imprisonment, set the conditions of release or indicate that the person or persons named
in the warrant shall not be entitled to bail and may, in all other cases, set the conditions
of release. The conditions of release, if included in the warrant, shall fix the first of the
following conditions which the court, judge or judge trial referee finds necessary to
assure such person's appearance in court: (1) Written promise to appear; (2) execution
of a bond without surety in no greater amount than necessary; or (3) execution of a bond
with surety in no greater amount than necessary.
(c) In lieu of a warrant for the rearrest of any defendant who fails to appear for trial
at the place and time specified or on any court date thereafter the court, judge or judge
trial referee may issue a capias.
(d) All process issued by said court or any judge thereof, or any judge trial referee
shall be served by any proper officer, or an indifferent person when specially directed
to do so, and shall be obeyed by any and all persons and officers to whom the same is
directed or whom it may concern.
(e) Whenever a warrant is issued under this section or section 53a-32, the court,
judge or judge trial referee may cause such warrant to be entered into a central computer
system. Existence of the warrant in the computer system shall constitute prima facie
evidence of the issuance of the warrant. Any person named in the warrant may be arrested
based on the existence of the warrant in the computer system and shall, upon any such
arrest, be given a copy of the warrant.
(1959, P.A. 28, S. 27; February, 1965, P.A. 194, S. 1; 1967, P.A. 10, S. 1; 152, S. 44; 549, S. 10; P.A. 74-183, S. 126,
291; P.A. 76-436, S. 518, 681; P.A. 77-576, S. 38, 65; P.A. 79-216, S. 1; P.A. 80-313, S. 2; P.A. 84-123, S. 2; P.A. 00-209, S. 4; P.A. 01-72, S. 1; P.A. 04-127, S. 8.)
History: 1965 act added authority of judge to issue subpoenas and warrants; 1967 acts deleted language in last sentence
qualifying power of judge as being "when the circuit court is not in session" and, effective October 1, 1968, added provisions
for alternatives to bail; P.A. 74-183 replaced circuit court with court of common pleas, effective December 31, 1974; P.A.
76-436 replaced court of common pleas with superior court and deleted references to powers of other unspecified courts
and judges, reflecting transfer of all trial jurisdiction to superior court, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-576 added detailed
provisions re procedure for issuance of bench warrants and clarified provisions with respect to crimes which are not bailable,
effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 79-216 made minor wording changes; P.A. 80-313 divided section into Subsecs., restated
power to issue bench warrants in Subsec. (a) and deleted detailed provisions re procedure re issuance of bench warrants
and arrests made on bench warrant; P.A. 84-123 amended Subsec. (a) by authorizing the issuance of capias for defendants
who violate a court order regarding any court appearance, added a new Subsec. (c) re the issuance of a capias in lieu of a
rearrest warrant, and redesignated former Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d); P.A. 00-209 made technical changes and added new
Subsec. (e) authorizing the entry of a rearrest warrant into a central computer system, providing that the existence of the
warrant in the computer system is prima facie evidence of its issuance and authorizing the arrest of a person based on the
existence of the warrant in the computer system; P.A. 01-72 amended Subsec. (a) by adding "or any judge trial referee
specifically designated by the Chief Justice to exercise the authority conferred by this section" and amended Subsecs. (b)
to (e) by adding references to judge trial referee; P.A. 04-127 amended Subsec. (e) by deleting reference to "rearrest"
warrant and adding reference to Sec. 53a-32.
See Sec. 54-64b re release following arrest on court warrant.
Annotations to former statute: At common law justice might take recognizance for appearance at adjourned sitting. 4
D. 98; 14 C. 209. In action on recognizance to town, claim against town cannot be set off. 45 C. 354. A bond to appear on
adjournment and abide the order of court is not forfeited when principal appears but refuses to give bond on appeal. 51 C.
499. Taking recognizance after adjournment. 77 C. 38. When bond on adjournment should run to state. 85 C. 324. Cited.
110 C. 173. Cited. 224 C. 29, 38. Cited. 229 C. 125, 152.
Service on defendant by exhibiting warrant so he could read it was sufficient compliance with this section. 28 CS 19.
Failure to produce witness who is within reach and who would naturally have been produced permits, but does not
require, inference that evidence of witness would have been unfavorable. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 298. Issuance of warrant upon
application of police officer, whose information concerning defendant's criminal act was based upon New Haven police
reports, was issuance upon probable cause. "Probable cause" is a practical concept and may be based upon hearsay. Id.,
529. Cited. Id., 685.
Annotations to present section:
Cited. 181 C. 562, 578. Cited. 187 C. 292, 311. Cited. 202 C. 443, 449. Cited. 233 C. 403, 414.
Cited. 38 CS 377, 381.
Subsec. (a):
Subdiv. (1) cited. 193 C. 612, 617. Subdiv. (1) cited. 205 C. 298, 311.
Subdiv. (1) cited. 27 CA 307, 313.
Sec. 54-2b. Transferred to Chapter 960, Sec. 54-56a.
Secs. 54-2c to 54-4. Traffic violator need not appear in court, when. Schedule
of fines established. Issue of warrant after arrest. Trial justice may issue criminal
process to be served anywhere in the state. Sections 54-2c to 54-4, inclusive, are
repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8722, 8723; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 204; 1967, P.A. 429; 1969, P.A. 455; 1971, P.A. 436; P.A. 74-183, S.
128, 291; P.A. 75-577, S. 123, 126.)
Sec. 54-5. Transferred to Chapter 960, Sec. 54-56f.
Secs. 54-6 to 54-12. Criminal jurisdiction of municipal courts. Limit of jurisdiction of municipal courts. Jurisdiction over violations concerning overweight
commercial vehicles. Bonds on adjournment of hearing. Copies of files and records
for Superior Court and state's attorneys on bindover; notice when proceeding
pending on seized property. Appointment of court interpreters in municipal and
trial justice court. Appeal from municipal court or trial justice. Sections 54-6 to
54-12, inclusive, are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 7579, 8726, 8730, 8731, 8733, 8741; 1953, S. 3096d; 1955, S. 3097d; June, 1955, S. 3096d; November,
1955, S. N229; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 138, 204; 1961, P.A. 179; 1963, P.A. 49; 1971, P.A. 321; P.A. 73-116, S. 16; 73-667, S.
1, 2; P.A. 74-183, S. 130, 291; P.A. 76-336, S. 1; 76-436, S. 521, 681.)
See Sec. 47a-23 re notice to quit possession of premises and service of such notice.
See Sec. 54-2a re issuance of bench warrants, subpoenas, capitas and other criminal process.
Secs. 54-13 and 54-14. Transferred to Chapter 961, Secs. 54-96a and 54-96b, respectively.
Secs. 54-15 and 54-16. Binding over on probable cause. Jurisdiction of Common Pleas Court on appeals. Sections 54-15 and 54-16 are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8727, 8742; 1949, S. 3320d; November, 1955, S. N230; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 141, 204; 1963, P.A. 642, S. 61.)
Sec. 54-17. Transferred to Chapter 961, Sec. 54-95a.
Sec. 54-17a. Presentation in one judicial district for offenses charged in various districts where defendant to plead guilty. When any person is arrested in any
judicial district upon a criminal charge within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court and
any indictment or information is pending against him in the superior court for one or
more other judicial districts, he may, with his consent and that of the state's attorney
for each such judicial district, be presented in the judicial district where the first warrant
served upon him originated for all of the offenses to which he intends to plead guilty.
(1961, P.A. 251; P.A. 73-116, S. 17; 73-667, S. 1, 2; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 4, 127.)
History: P.A. 73-116 added references to judicial districts; P.A. 73-667 changed effective date of P.A. 73-116 from
October 1, 1973, to April 25, 1973; P.A. 78-280 deleted references to counties.
Cited. 25 CS 202.
Sec. 54-18. Transferred to Chapter 890, Sec. 51-353a.
Secs. 54-18a to 54-21. Transfer of criminal cases between Superior and Common Pleas Court. Certain cases to be tried at first term. Search when cruelty is
suspected. Search warrants in cases of cruelty to animals. Sections 54-18a to 54-21, inclusive, are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8724, 8745, 8787; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 143; 1961, P.A. 517, S. 70; 1963, P.A. 642, S. 63; 652, S. 10; 1971,
P.A. 590; P.A. 73-116, S. 19; 73-667, S. 1, 2; P.A. 74-183, S. 134, 291; P.A. 76-336, S. 10; 76-436, S. 525, 526, 681.)
See Secs. 53-247 to 53-253, inclusive, re cruelty to animals.
See Sec. 54-33a et seq. re searches, generally.
Secs. 54-22 to 54-24. Transferred to Chapter 961, Secs. 54-82i to 54-82k, inclusive.
Secs. 54-25 and 54-26. Release on recognizance. Witnesses in courts of other
states. Sections 54-25 and 54-26 are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8746, 8762; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 147; P.A. 76-336, S. 10; P.A. 80-313, S. 61.)
See Sec. 54-82k for successor provisions.
Sec. 54-27. Transferred to Chapter 890, Sec. 51-348a.
Sec. 54-28. Transferred to Chapter 890, Sec. 51-352b.
Secs. 54-29 to 54-31. Seizure of obscene literature and gambling implements.
Illegal articles and implements to be destroyed. Judges of city courts may act.
Sections 54-29 to 54-31, inclusive, are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8752-8754; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 148, 204; 1963, P.A. 652, S. 10.)
See Sec. 54-33a et seq. re searches, generally.
Sec. 54-32. Transferred to Chapter 945, Sec. 53-243a.
PART II*
SEARCHES
*Secs. 54-33a et seq. cited. 14 CA 356, 362.
Sec. 54-33. Search warrants for gambling and lottery implements. Section 54-33 is repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 8756; 1959, P.A. 28, S. 149; 1963, P.A. 652, S. 10.)
See Sec. 54-33a et seq. re searches, generally.
Sec. 54-33a. Issuance of search warrant. (a) As used in sections 54-33a to 54-33g, inclusive, "property" includes, without limitation, documents, books, papers, films,
recordings and any other tangible thing.
(b) Upon complaint on oath by any state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or
by any two credible persons, to any judge of the Superior Court or judge trial referee,
that such state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or such persons have probable
cause to believe that any property (1) possessed, controlled, designed or intended for
use or which is or has been used or which may be used as the means of committing any
criminal offense; or (2) which was stolen or embezzled; or (3) which constitutes evidence
of an offense, or that a particular person participated in the commission of an offense,
is within or upon any place, thing or person, such judge or judge trial referee, except as
provided in section 54-33j, may issue a warrant commanding a proper officer to enter
into or upon such place or thing, search the same or the person and take into such officer's
custody all such property named in the warrant.
(c) A warrant may issue only on affidavit sworn to by the complainant or complainants before the judge or judge trial referee and establishing the grounds for issuing the
warrant, which affidavit shall be part of the arrest file. If the judge or judge trial referee
is satisfied that grounds for the application exist or that there is probable cause to believe
that they exist, the judge or judge trial referee shall issue a warrant identifying the
property and naming or describing the person, place or thing to be searched. The warrant
shall be directed to any police officer of a regularly organized police department or any
state police officer, to an inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice or to a conservation
officer, special conservation officer or patrolman acting pursuant to section 26-6. The
warrant shall state the date and time of its issuance and the grounds or probable cause
for its issuance and shall command the officer to search within a reasonable time the
person, place or thing named, for the property specified. The inadvertent failure of the
issuing judge or judge trial referee to state on the warrant the time of its issuance shall
not in and of itself invalidate the warrant.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 1, 3; February, 1965, P.A. 439; 574, S. 46; P.A. 74-183, S. 138, 291; P.A. 76-436, S. 530, 681; P.A.
77-504; P.A. 79-14, S. 3; P.A. 80-313, S. 8; P.A. 81-227, S. 3; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1, S. 39, 121; P.A. 00-31; P.A. 01-72, S. 2; P.A. 04-147, S. 2.)
History: 1965 acts authorized search of person and made grammatical correction; P.A. 74-183 replaced circuit court
with court of common pleas in Subsec. (b), reflecting reorganization of judicial system, effective December 31, 1974; P.A.
76-436 added reference to assistant state's attorneys and deleted reference to prosecuting attorneys and to court of common
pleas in Subsec. (b), reflecting transfer of all trial jurisdiction to superior court, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-504 added
Subdiv. (3) in Subsec. (b) authorizing issuance of search warrant to discover property constituting evidence of offense or
evidence that a person participated in the commission of an offense; P.A. 79-14 added exception re Sec. 54-33j in Subsec.
(b)(3); P.A. 80-313 substituted "may" for "shall" in Subsec. (c) provision re issuance of warrant on sworn affidavit; P.A.
81-227 amended Subsec. (c) by authorizing judges to direct search warrants to conservation officers and patrolmen acting
pursuant to Sec. 26-6; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1 made a technical change in Subsec. (c), effective June 24, 1998; P.A. 00-31 amended Subsec. (c) to require the warrant to state the date and time of its issuance and to add provision that the
inadvertent failure of the issuing judge to state on the warrant the time of its issuance shall not in and of itself invalidate
the warrant, and made technical changes in Subsecs. (b) and (c) for purposes of gender neutrality; P.A. 01-72 added
references to judge trial referee in Subsecs. (b) and (c); P.A. 04-147 amended Subsec. (c) to authorize a warrant to be
directed to an inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice and make a technical change for purposes of gender neutrality.
See Sec. 54-154 re taxing of expenses in search and seizure cases.
Under former statute, obscene materials could be seized regardless of who possessed them or of knowledge or intent
in such possession. 146 C. 78. Former statute did not authorize seizure of contraceptive material. 126 C. 428. This section
and sections 54-33b to 54-33g, inclusive, passed subsequent to Mapp v. Ohio (367 U.S. 643) which held that evidence
obtained by unlawful search and seizure is inadmissible in state courts. Prior to such passage if search and seizure were
incidental to lawful arrest, they were not unreasonable. 149 C. 567. Cited. 153 C. 8. Judge issuing search warrant not
required to recite in warrant the grounds on which he found probable cause. Id., 708, 709. Warrant calling for search and
seizure of passenger automobile includes whatever was an integral part or component of that automobile, e.g., dust on
floor, stains on interior, seats and cushions. 155 C. 145. Neither the recital that affiant had information from reliable
informant nor statement that apartment sought to be searched had been under surveillance were sufficient grounds for
issuance of warrant; warrant issued was illegal. Id., 385. Cited. 165 C. 239. Cited. 169 C. 322, 327. Cited. 170 C. 618,
628. Cited. 181 C. 562, 589. Cited. 196 C. 471, 481. Cited. 206 C. 90, 93. Cited. 219 C. 529, 540. Cited. 224 C. 29, 38.
Cited. 226 C. 514, 524, 541.
Cited. 10 CA 561, 564. Cited. 30 CA 249, 255.
Search and seizure which, though without warrant, is consented to is not within exclusionary rule. But mere acquiescence
in and peaceful submission to demands of searching officers is not to be construed as consent. 23 CS 41. Defendant's
application for order to return articles illegally seized was denied. Id. Where search warrant is issued and executed, presumption is that proper legal procedure was observed and burden is on defendant to overcome presumption. Id., 405. Even
though evidence was obtained as result of illegal search and seizure, defendant was not entitled to motion to suppress
evidence in advance of trial. 24 CS 36. But see now section 54-33f. Arrest for minor traffic violation did not justify search
of car without a warrant. 25 CS 229. If stolen goods were in plain sight, search might have been justified. Id. Reference
in warrant, after specifying drugs and named instruments for using them, concluded "and any other paraphernalia" which
could be used in taking drugs and was too broad; items not specifically mentioned in warrant could not be used in evidence.
28 CS 19. Cited. 41 CS 1, 2, 6.
Where judge had before him no information which permitted him to make an independent judicial determination of
the existence of probable cause for the issuance of a search and seizure warrant, the issuance of such warrant was in
violation of the constitution and the evidence seized as a result of its execution is not admissible in defendants' trial. 3
Conn. Cir. Ct. 97, 98. An unsigned and undated search warrant is fatally defective, invalid and void and confers no authority
to act thereunder. Id., 641, 644. Supporting affidavit sufficient when it recited several instances of information by others
of defendant operating his home for pool selling and police surveillance of activity of defendant in community. Name of
informant need not be disclosed. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 603. Cited. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 44, 46. Motion to suppress evidence obtained
by search and seizure under warrant issued fourteen days before actual seizure granted on grounds execution of warrant
was not made within reasonable time. Id., 468. Affidavit in support of search warrant for violation of pool selling statute, that
set forth underlying circumstances, reasons informants were reliable, actual betting transactions and personal observation of
defendant by affiants was sufficient. Id., 669.
Subsec. (b):
Subdiv. (1) cited. 179 C. 23, 38; 192 C. 98, 103. Cited. 196 C. 471, 476. Subdiv. (1) cited. Id., 471, 475, 477. Cited.
229 C. 125, 152.
Possession or control of property is relevant, not ownership. 57 CA 396.
Subdiv. (1) cited. 1 CA 315, 317, 318. Cited. 41 CS 1, 3.
Subsec. (c):
Cited. 179 C. 522, 531. Search warrant, unsigned by judge, was not legally "issued". 184 C. 95, 97. Cited. 188 C. 183,
195. Neither this section nor the commonly approved definition of "affidavit" requires assigned jurat; judgment of appellate
court in State v. Colon, 32 CA 402, 404, reversed, 230 C. 24, 29, 30, 32, 33, 36, 39.
Cited. 14 CA 356, 363. Cited. 32 CA 402, 405-408; judgment reversed, see 230 C. 24 et seq. Cited. 39 CA 369, 383.
Sec. 54-33b. Search of person. The officer serving a search warrant may, if such
officer has reason to believe that any of the property described in the warrant is concealed
in the garments of any person in or upon the place or thing to be searched, search the
person for the purpose of seizing the same. When the person to be searched is a woman,
the search shall be made by a policewoman or other woman assisting in the service of
the warrant, or by a woman designated by the judge or judge trial referee issuing the
warrant.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 2; P.A. 80-313, S. 9; P.A. 01-72, S. 4.)
History: P.A. 80-313 rephrased provisions but made no substantive changes; P.A. 01-72 made a technical change for
purposes of gender neutrality and added reference to judge trial referee.
See note to Sec. 54-33a.
Origin of former statute re search of person. 126 C. 433.
Cited. 28 CS 23.
Cited. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 44, 46. Search of person on premises of store searched under warrant was constitutional as
statute provides for reasonable searches and seizes, not unreasonable ones. Id., 637.
Sec. 54-33c. Application for warrant. Execution and return of warrant. Copy
of affidavit to be given to owner, occupant or person named in warrant; exceptions.
Disclosure of affidavit limited by prosecuting attorney, when. (a) The applicant for
the search warrant shall file the application for the warrant and all affidavits upon which
the warrant is based with the clerk of the court for the geographical area within which
any person who may be arrested in connection with or subsequent to the execution of
the search warrant would be presented with the return of the warrant. The warrant shall
be executed within ten days and returned with reasonable promptness consistent with
due process of law and shall be accompanied by a written inventory of all property
seized. A copy of such warrant shall be given to the owner or occupant of the dwelling,
structure, motor vehicle or place designated therein, or the person named therein. Within
forty-eight hours of such search, a copy of the application for the warrant and a copy
of all affidavits upon which the warrant is based shall be given to such owner, occupant
or person. The judge or judge trial referee may, by order, dispense with the requirement
of giving a copy of the affidavits to such owner, occupant or person at such time if the
applicant for the warrant files a detailed affidavit with the judge or judge trial referee
which demonstrates to the judge or judge trial referee that (1) the personal safety of a
confidential informant would be jeopardized by the giving of a copy of the affidavits
at such time, or (2) the search is part of a continuing investigation which would be
adversely affected by the giving of a copy of the affidavits at such time, or (3) the
giving of such affidavits at such time would require disclosure of information or material
prohibited from being disclosed by chapter 959a. If the judge or judge trial referee
dispenses with the requirement of giving a copy of the affidavits at such time, such order
shall not affect the right of such owner, occupant or person to obtain such copy at any
subsequent time. No such order shall limit the disclosure of such affidavits to the attorney
for a person arrested in connection with or subsequent to the execution of a search
warrant unless, upon motion of the prosecuting authority within two weeks of such
person's arraignment, the court finds that the state's interest in continuing nondisclosure
substantially outweighs the defendant's right to disclosure.
(b) Any order dispensing with the requirement of giving a copy of the warrant
application and accompanying affidavits to such owner, occupant or person within forty-eight hours shall be for a specific period of time, not to exceed two weeks beyond the
date the warrant is executed. Within that time period the prosecuting authority may seek
an extension of such period. Upon the execution and return of the warrant, affidavits
which have been the subject of such an order shall remain in the custody of the clerk's
office in a secure location apart from the remainder of the court file.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 4; 1971, P.A. 291; P.A. 76-155; P.A. 85-306; P.A. 89-247; P.A. 97-40, S. 8; P.A. 99-215, S. 9; P.
A. 01-72, S. 5.)
History: 1971 act set ten-day deadline for execution of warrant and required that copy of warrant be given to owner or
occupant of dwelling, structure etc. to be searched or to the person named in the warrant; P.A. 76-155 set forty-eight hour
deadline for giving copy of warrant and added provisions re requirement that copy of warrant application, affidavits be
given to owner, occupant or person named in warrant; P.A. 85-306 required the applicant to file a detailed affidavit with
the judge before the judge may dispense with the requirement of giving a copy of the affidavits; P.A. 89-247 added
provisions re filing of copy of search warrant application with clerk of court, re prohibition of clerks' disclosing information
pertinent to the application, re protection of rights of an arrested person's attorney to disclosure of affidavits and re time
limits on orders which dispense with requirement that copy of warrant application and affidavits be given to interested
parties within forty-eight hours and divided section into Subsecs.; P.A. 97-40 changed "issuance" to "execution" of warrant
in Subsec. (a); P.A. 99-215 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting provision requiring filing of copy of warrant and that search
be conducted within one business day of execution and prohibiting clerk from disclosure of information re application or
affidavits of search warrant and substituting provision that any person arrested in connection with or subsequent to execution
of search warrant would be presented with return of warrant; P.A. 01-72 amended Subsec. (a) by adding references to
judge trial referee.
See note to Sec. 54-33a.
Return on search warrant, not defective. 163 C. 107. Cited. 165 C. 239.
Cited. 7 CA 265, 266, 271. Cited. 10 CA 347, 349. Cited. 14 CA 356, 363, 364. Cited. 15 CA 251, 252, 265, 268, 269.
Cited. 18 CA 477, 480, 482.
Cited. 28 CS 23. Omission of signature from copies of warrant and affidavits served on defendant held harmless error;
exclusionary rule discussed. 35 CS 225-228. Cited. Id. Cited. 36 CS 570, 572. Cited. 40 CS 20, 24, 26.
Cited. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 44, 46. Execution of search and seizure warrant fourteen days after its issuance held unreasonable
lapse of time although officers' daily surveillance made this the opportune date for search. Motion to suppress evidence
seized granted. Id., 468.
Subsec. (a):
Cited. 239 C. 793.
Sec. 54-33d. Interference with search. Any person who forcibly assaults, resists,
opposes, impedes, intimidates or interferes with any person authorized to serve or execute search warrants or to make searches and seizures while engaged in the performance
of his duties with regard thereto or on account of the performance of such duties, shall
be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than one year or
both; and any person who in committing any violation of this section uses any deadly
or dangerous weapon shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned
not more than ten years or both.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 5.)
See note to Sec. 54-33a.
Cited. 165 C. 239.
Cited. 11 CA 47, 48. Cited. 24 CA 330, 331.
Cited. 30 CS 211.
Cited. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 176.
Sec. 54-33e. Destruction of property. Any person who, before, during or after
seizure of any property by any police officer authorized to make searches and seizures,
in order to prevent the seizure or securing of any property named in the warrant by such
police officer, breaks, destroys or removes or causes the breaking, destruction or removal
of the same, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more
than one year or both.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 6.)
Cited. 165 C. 239. Cited. 173 C. 450, 451.
Cited. 26 CA 667, 668.
Cited. 30 CS 211.
Cited. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 44, 46; 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 176.
Sec. 54-33f. Motion for return of unlawfully seized property and suppression
as evidence. (a) A person aggrieved by search and seizure may move the court which
has jurisdiction of such person's case or, if such jurisdiction has not yet been invoked,
then the court which issued the warrant, or the court in which such person's case is
pending, for the return of the property and to suppress for use as evidence anything so
obtained on the ground that: (1) The property was seized without a warrant, or (2) the
warrant is insufficient on its face, or (3) the property seized is not that described in the
warrant, or (4) there was not probable cause for believing the existence of the grounds
on which the warrant was issued, or (5) the warrant was illegally executed. In no case
may the judge or judge trial referee who signed the warrant preside at the hearing on
the motion.
(b) The motion shall be made before trial or hearing unless opportunity therefor did
not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court in
its discretion may entertain the motion at the trial or hearing.
(c) The court shall receive evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision
of the motion. If the motion is granted, the property shall be restored unless otherwise
subject to lawful detention and it shall not be admissible in evidence at any hearing
or trial.
(1963, P.A. 652, S. 7; 1967, P.A. 4; 1969, P.A. 292, S. 1; P.A. 80-313, S. 10; P.A. 01-72, S. 6.)
History: 1967 act added proviso prohibiting judge who signed warrant from presiding at hearing on motion; 1969 act
authorized aggrieved person to make motion "in the court in which his case is pending" for return of property and to
suppress its use as evidence; P.A. 80-313 reorganized provisions and divided section into Subsecs.; P.A. 01-72 amended
Subsec. (a) by making technical changes for purposes of gender neutrality and adding reference to judge trial referee.
See note to Sec. 54-33a.
History discussed. 152 C. 90. Cited. 154 C. 314, 321. Neither statement that affiant had information from reliable
informant nor that apartment sought to be searched had been under police surveillance was sufficient grounds for issuance
of warrant, hence search warrant was illegal. 155 C. 385. Motion to suppress evidence consisting of several marked bills
found on defendant immediately after he was observed selling narcotics to an informer, obtained by search incident to his
lawful arrest for commission of felony of illegal sale of narcotics, properly denied. Id., 516. Ruling denying defendant's
motion to suppress evidence of narcotics seized by arresting officer from stolen car in defendant's possession without
obtaining search warrant was superseded by ruling during trial admitting narcotics as evidence. Where defendant driver
of stolen car had been arrested and drugs were found in car on custodial search by arresting officer, motion to suppress
use of drugs in evidence properly denied. 159 C. 201, 211. Cited. 169 C. 322, 326. Person aggrieved by search and seizure
may move to suppress for use as evidence anything obtained upon warrant when there is not probable cause for believing
the existence of grounds for warrant. 170 C. 618, 629. Cited. 195 C. 668, 672. Cited. 216 C. 150, 155-158, see also 26
CA 423 et seq., 27 CA 291 et seq., 223 C. 902, and 225 C. 10 et seq., reversing judgment of appellate court in State v.
Marsala. Cited. 223 C. 903. Cited. 226 C. 514, 516, 524, 528, 529. Cited. 239 C. 793.
Cited. 10 CA 561, 564. Cited. 14 CA 605, 609, 623-626. Cited. 27 CA 370, 373. Cited. 31 CA 548, 550.
Use of motion to suppress. 29 CS 423. Motion to dismiss, motion to suppress, difference. 30 CS 211. This section
implements fourth amendment of U.S. Const. and Art. I, Sec. 7 of the Conn. Const. and is analogous to rule 41 of Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure; purposes of rule. 33 CS 129.
Evidence obtained by an immediate search of defendant's apartment after her arrest for liquor violation was admissible.
Search without warrant was an incident to a lawful arrest. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 125. Where officers went beyond directives of
warrant for search of defendant and certain premises and searched automobiles, evidence obtained was suppressed, but
articles taken were not returned in absence of demand or request. Id., 422, 423. Property sought to be suppressed was
voluntarily handed over to police officers by defendant's wife who was not party to defendant's appeal. He has no standing
to claim violation of wife's constitutional rights as these are personal to her. Id., 605. Testimony or information, although
not tangible, come within purview of statute. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 44. Although not expressly required it is better practice for
motion to suppress to be in writing. Id., 51. Motion by defendant to suppress evidence seized in search of his car dismissed
by circuit court where prosecuting attorney had instituted bindover proceedings in superior court. Id., 119. While it is better
practice to test legality of seizure in preliminary hearing, court may entertain motion to suppress at trial. Officers did not
search for papers where they had defendant under surveillance in his store and saw him putting papers under rafters of
hatchway and picked them up upon arrest. Id., 613. Where there was probable cause to believe that defendant was in
business of pool selling from allegations of affidavit, search warrant was properly issued. Id., 669. Burden of proof relative
to the illegality of search and seizure is on accused. Newspaper, policy sheet and pen discarded by accused were abandoned
property and apprehension of them by police is not seizure of defendant's property. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 17. (5) Doctrine of
retroactivity not applied to procedural problem of this kind. Id., 192, 194. Motion to suppress must specify item to be
suppressed. Id., 454. Cited. Id., 574; 584.
Subsec. (a):
Cited. 14 CA 605, 625. Subdiv. (5) cited. 15 CA 251, 268. Cited. 27 CA 370, 373.
Subsec. (c):
Cited. 216 C. 150, 155, see also 26 CA 423 et seq., 27 CA 291 et seq., 223 C. 902, and 225 C. 10 et seq., reversing
judgment of appellate court in State v. Marsala.
Sec. 54-33g. Summons to owner on seizure of property. In rem action for adjudication as nuisance. Disposition of property. (a) When any property believed to be
possessed, controlled, designed or intended for use or which is or has been used or which
may be used as a means of committing any criminal offense, except a violation of section
21a-267, 21a-277, 21a-278 or 21a-279, has been seized as a result of a lawful arrest or
lawful search, which the state claims to be a nuisance and desires to have destroyed or
disposed of in accordance with the provisions of this section, the judge or court issuing
the warrant or before whom the arrested person is to be arraigned shall, within ten days
after such seizure, cause to be left with the owner of, and with any person claiming of
record a bona fide mortgage, assignment of lease or rent, lien or security interest in, the
property so seized, or at his usual place of abode, if he is known, or, if unknown, at the
place where the property was seized, a summons notifying the owner and any such other
person claiming such interest and all others whom it may concern to appear before such
judge or court, at a place and time named in such notice, which shall be not less than
six nor more than twelve days after the service thereof. Such summons may be signed
by a clerk of the court or his assistant and service may be made by a local or state police
officer. It shall describe such property with reasonable certainty and state when and
where and why the same was seized.
(b) If the owner of such property or any person claiming any interest in the same
appears, he shall be made a party d