Sec. 4-194. Refusal to disclose. Medical doctor to review data. Judicial relief.
(a) If an agency determines that disclosure to a person of medical, psychiatric or psychological data concerning him would be detrimental to that person, or that nondisclosure
to a person of personal data concerning him is otherwise permitted or required by law,
the agency may refuse to disclose that personal data, and shall refuse disclosure where
required by law. In either case, the agency shall advise that person of his right to seek
judicial relief.
(b) If an agency refuses to disclose personal data to a person and the nondisclosure
is not mandated by law, the agency shall, at the written request of such person, permit
a qualified medical doctor to review the personal data contained in the person's record
to determine if the personal data should be disclosed. If disclosure is recommended by
the person's medical doctor, the agency shall disclose the personal data to such person;
if nondisclosure is recommended by such person's medical doctor, the agency shall not
disclose the personal data and shall inform such person of the judicial relief provided
under section 4-195.
(P.A. 76-421, S. 5, 9; P.A. 77-431, S. 4, 5, 6.)
History: P.A. 77-431 added Subsec. (b) regarding review of personal data by doctor in disclosure decisions, effective
January 1, 1978.
Cited. 186 C. 153, 154; Id., 153, 157, 165. (Diss. Op.).
Subsec. (a):
Cited. 186 C. 153, 160, 163-165. (Diss. Op.).
Subsec. (b):
Cited. 30 CA 794, 796, 797.
Sec. 4-195. Petition to court for failure to disclose. If disclosure of personal data
is refused by an agency under section 4-194, any person aggrieved thereby may, within
thirty days of such refusal, petition the superior court for the judicial district in which
he resides for an order requiring the agency to disclose the personal data. Such a proceeding shall be privileged with respect to assignment for trial. The court, after hearing and
an in camera review of the personal data in question, shall issue the order requested unless
it determines that such disclosure would be detrimental to the person or is otherwise
prohibited by law.
(P.A. 76-421, S. 6, 9; P.A. 77-431, S. 5, 6; 77-452, S. 47, 72; P.A. 82-472, S. 8, 183.)
History: P.A. 77-431 changed effective date of section from July 1, 1977, to January 1, 1978; P.A. 77-452 replaced
court of common pleas with superior court, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 82-472 deleted obsolete reference to county as
venue for superior court.
Cited. 186 C. 153, 154. Proceeding under this section not subject to restrictions imposed by Sec. 51-197b. Id., 153-
156, 160.
Cited. 30 CA 794, 796.
Sec. 4-196. Agencies to adopt regulations conforming to Attorney General's
standards. (a) Each state agency shall, within six months of July 1, 1977, adopt regulations pursuant to chapter 54 which describe:
(1) The general nature and purpose of the agency's personal data systems;
(2) The categories of personal and other data kept in the agency's personal data
systems;
(3) The agency's procedures regarding the maintenance of personal data;
(4) The uses to be made of the personal data maintained by the agency.
(b) The Attorney General shall adopt uniform standards for regulations adopted
pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. After such standards are adopted and distributed to state agencies by the Attorney General but not later than six months after October
1, 1984, each state agency shall review such regulations to determine whether they
conform to such standards. Regulations which do not so conform shall be amended in
accordance with the provisions of chapter 54. Notwithstanding the provisions of section
4-169, the Attorney General may disapprove any regulation submitted for his approval
under said section, which fails to conform to such standards.
(P.A. 76-421, S. 7, 9; 77-431, S. 5, 6; P.A. 84-380, S. 2.)
History: P.A. 77-431 changed effective date of section from July 1, 1977, to June 14, 1977; P.A. 84-380 added requirement that attorney general adopt standards for regulations and review state agency regulations for conformity as Subsec.
(b) and applied previous provisions to state agencies only.
Cited. 186 C. 153, 154.
Sec. 4-197. Action against agency for violation of chapter. Any agency which
violates any provision of this chapter shall be subject to an action by any aggrieved
person for injunction, declaratory judgment, mandamus or a civil action for damages.
Such action may be brought in the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford, or
for the judicial district in which the person resides. Actions for injunction, declaratory
judgment or mandamus under this section may be prosecuted by any aggrieved person
or by the Attorney General in the name of the state upon his own complaint or upon the
complaint of any individual. Any aggrieved person who prevails in an action under this
section shall be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. An action
under this section shall be privileged with respect to assignment for trial.
(P.A. 76-421, S. 8, 9; 77-431, S. 5, 6; P.A. 78-280, S. 6, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142,
S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4-6.)
History: P.A. 77-431 changed effective date of section from July 1, 1977, to January 1, 1978; P.A. 78-280 replaced
"Hartford county" with "the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain"; P.A. 88-230 replaced "judicial district of Hartford-New Britain" with "judicial district of Hartford", effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of
P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from
September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230
from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995.
Cited. 183 C. 85, 91. Cited. 186 C. 153, 154.