Topic:
ELDERLY; HOUSING (GENERAL);
Location:
HOUSING - ELDERLY;

OLR Research Report


February 20, 2004

 

2004-R-0191

HOUSING SURVEY FOLLOW UP

By: Sarah Black, Legislative Fellow

Patricia O’Rourke, Legislative Fellow

Kristina Sadlak, Legislative Fellow

Joseph Holstead, Research Analyst

You asked us to contact the housing authorities (HAs) that did not respond to a December 2003 survey by the Connecticut chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Authorities (CONN-NAHRO). Specifically, you wanted to know if these HAs have experienced (1) tensions between young disabled and elderly people living in their senior housing projects and (2) an increase in the number of young disabled residents in their state-assisted senior housing units over the past five years.

SUMMARY

CONN-NAHRO surveyed 90 of the 108 state HAs. It concluded that there was a problem based on answers from 35 of the 40 responding HAs surveyed. We contacted 40 of the HAs that did not respond.

Of the 16 additional HAs that completed the OLR survey, nine reported some trouble between elderly and nonelderly tenants, with five of those reporting significant problems (either ongoing or specific incidents).

Six of the 16 have seen increases in the number of nonelderly people with disabilities living there over the past five years, five had no data on increases, three saw no changes, one saw a decrease, and one has no state units. By law, people certified as totally disabled by any federal agency qualify to live in state-assisted senior (by law, age 62 or older) housing, regardless of age (CGS § 8-113a (c)).

CONN-NAHRO SURVEY

In December 2003, CONN-NAHRO completed a survey of HAs to determine, among other things, how many nonelderly people with disabilities are living in state-assisted senior housing developments in each town. It contacted 90 HAs, 40 of which responded, according to the CONN-NAHRO survey. Five of those HAs had only federally-assisted senior housing units. The survey accounted for 3,538 state elderly units. The state has a total of 7,224 elderly units.

Of the 35 HAs with state-assisted senior housing responding to CONN-NAHRO, regarding the number of nonelderly people with disabilities, over the past five years (1) 31 reported increases, (2) three reported a decrease, and (3) one had no information available. A copy of the survey is attached.

OLR SURVEY

We contacted housing authorities between January 22 and January 27, 2004, that did not respond to CONN-NAHRO survey, and asked: (1) how many state-assisted senior housing units do you have, (2) how many nonelderly people with disabilities live in those units, (3) has the number of nonelderly people with disabilities increased in the past five years, and (4) have there been any recent problems or difficulties between the two groups.

In answering the questions, some HAs did not have specifics, but provided approximate numbers or anecdotal responses. For example, several HAs reported that there are general difficulties between elderly people and nonelderly people with disabilities (e. g. , hours kept and noise). Six of the 16 HAs reported an increase in the number of nonelderly people with disabilities in the past five years, five had no data (for comparison purposes), three saw no change, and one saw a decrease (from three to two), and one has no state units.

Table one (below) describes the results of the telephone survey completed by OLR.

Table 1: Number of Nonelderly People with Disabilities in

State- Assisted Senior Housing for 16 Housing Authorities

Housing Authority

# Of State Elderly Housing Units

# Of Nonelderly (N. E. ) people with disabilities

Change in # of N. E. people with disabilities compared to 5 years ago

Any difficulties or problems between the two groups

Berlin

70

8

No data

Alcohol use by and mental illness in the disabled population pose significant problems.

Brookfield

35

4

No increase

None

Cheshire

48

12

Doubled (approximately)

No specific incidents, but some tension

Coventry

80

18

No data

Many problems, mainly with psychological issues and damage to the apts.

Greenwich

251

50

10% increase

None

Ledyard

30

2

No data

None

Manchester

350

No data

No data

Intermittent problems

North Branford

60

11 (approx. )

Tripled

1 incident

Plainfield

72

4

Doubled

None

Plymouth

60

11

Double

(at least)

More problems recently, but no specific incidents

Seymour

0

Stonington

60

1

No data

None

Thomaston

62

1

No data

None

Vernon

321

10 (approx. )

Tripled

5 incidents

Westport

50

6

No increase

Frequent problems between two communities

Winchester

119

20

No increase

Mostly general conflicts stemming from lifestyle choices

SB/PO/KS/JH: ts