MEDICAID; HEALTH INSURANCE;

WELFARE - MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (MEDICAID); INSURANCE - HEALTH;

Federal laws/regulations; Connecticut laws/regulations;

OLR Research Report


April 30, 2003

 

2003-R-0385

OTHER STATES' SUBSIDIZED HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR CARETAKER ADULTS

 

By: Robin K. Cohen, Principal Analyst

You asked for a list of states that offer subsidized health insurance for adults that is comparable to or more generous than Connecticut’s Section 1931 coverage for non-disabled adult caretaker relatives of children enrolled in Medicaid.

The bulk of the information in this report comes from federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fact sheets and conversations with CMS staff. We also relied on information provided by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

SUMMARY

they receive cash assistance. This report focuses only on those states that provide Medicaid to caretaker relatives who do not receive cash assistance. (Parents making the transition from cash welfare to work can get up to two years of Medicaid with higher incomes. )

We do not know the total number of states providing Medicaid to these caretaker relatives. However, NCSL reports that currently five states (California, Maine, New Jersey, Ohio, and Rhode Island) and the District of Columbia (DC) offer Section 1931 Medicaid coverage to adult caretakers with income limits equaling or more generous than Connecticut’s program. They all offer this coverage using limits tied to the FPL: California (100%), Maine (150%), Ohio (100%), Rhode Island (100%), and the District of Columbia (200%). (New Jersey offers this coverage up to 133% of the FPL but is phasing it out. New applicants may not have incomes higher than 30% of the FPL. ) Governor Davis has likewise recommended lowering California’s limit to 60% of the FPL but this has not been approved by the legislature. (Given rising budget deficits, several states are proposing Medicaid cuts and some of these scale back adult Medicaid coverage. A recent Center on Budget and Policies and Priorities paper www. cbbp. org reports on these activities. )

Moreover, although they offer an alternate route to coverage, waivers are not necessarily equivalent to straight Medicaid coverage, which requires nominal, if any, coinsurance and offers a fairly broad array of services. Almost all waiver states require premiums, co-payments, or both, although these coinsurance payments are usually capped. And many limit the types of Medicaid services covered.

New Jersey, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and Minnesota have Section 1115 SCHIP waivers to provide adult coverage with income limits at or above 100% of the FPL. Nine states use Section 1115 Medicaid waivers to offer this coverage. In the latter states, the family coverage is usually a part of a larger expansion initiative.

HEALTH CARE EXPANSIONS TO COVER ADULTS

Section 1931 of the Social Security Act

Connecticut’s Section 1931 Coverage

Table 1 lists the jurisdictions with Section 1931 Medicaid coverage that apply the same or higher income limits than Connecticut. It also indicates which of these states have asset tests and what they are.

Table 1. Jurisdictions with Section 1931 Coverage Comparable to or More Generous than Connecticut

Jurisdictions

Income Limit as Percentage of FPL

Asset Test

California

100%

$ 3,150

Connecticut

100%

None

Maine

150%

$ 2,000

Ohio

100%

None

Rhode Island

100%

None

District of Columbia

200%

None

Source: NCSL

SCHIP and Medicaid Section 1115 Waivers

Tables 2 and 3 list the states that offer subsidized health coverage to caretaker adults who do not receive cash assistance and allow income limits equal to or greater than Connecticut allows under Section 1931.

The states in Table 2 provide coverage using 1115 SCHIP waivers. As we mentioned above, once a state spends its SCHIP block grant allotment, no new additional federal funds are available. But in all four states, coverage reverts to Medicaid once the SCHIP allotments are spent.

This means that these adults would still get health care coverage but it would be paid with Medicaid instead of SCHIP funds. Table 3 shows those states that have used Section 1115 Medicaid waivers to offer health care coverage to caretaker adults.

For each state, we include income and benefit limits and cost sharing requirements.

Table 2. 1115 SCHIP Waiver States

States

Income Limit as Percentage of FPL*

Cost Sharing Requirements

Benefit Limits

Minnesota

Between 100% and 200% of FPL

Premiums based on household size; parents and caretaker adults make co-payments (e. g. , $ 3 for prescriptions)

Unknown

New Jersey (1)

Between 100% and 200% of FPL

Copayments required if income is between 150% and 200% of FPL, with annual cap at 5% of family income.

Parents up to 133% of FPL receive standard Medicaid package; parents with incomes between 134% and 200% of FPL receive state-defined benefit package based on HMO package most widely sold in state.

Rhode Island

Between 100% and 185% of FPL

Monthly premium up to 5% of annual income for people with family income over 150% of FPL.

Comparable to Medicaid.

Wisconsin

Between 100% and 185% of FPL

Premium equaling 3% to 3. 5% of family income over 150%.

Same as Medicaid. People with employer-sponsored coverage get Medicaid wrap-around for those services unavailable through employer coverage.

Source: CMS

* Applies to parents and caretaker relatives.

Table 3. 1115 Medicaid Waiver States

States

Income Limit as Percentage of FPL

Cost Sharing Requirements

Benefit Limits

Delaware

100%

None

Same as Medicaid

Hawaii

100%

$ 7 co-pay for certain services, $ 25 for ER non-emergency condition.

Comparable to Medicaid, but enrollment apparently capped for this population.

Massachusetts

133%

None

Same as Medicaid

Minnesota

275%

Premiums, additional cost-sharing for dental, prescriptions, and eyeglasses.

Same as Medicaid

Missouri

Several1

$ 10 office visit co-payments, $ 9 per prescription, no cap.

Same as Medicaid.

New York

150%

None

Less comprehensive package than Medicaid. Long-term care, non-emergency transportation, medical supplies excluded.

Tennessee

100% (as approved by CMS)

Three-tiered pharmacy co-payment schedules for enrollees ($ 1, $ 3, and $ 5). Also, out-of-pocket annual cap of $ 2,000 for family. No premiums.

Comparable to state employee HMO package. All enrollees receive no non-emergency transportation or chiropractors, and limited durable medical equipment, medical supplies, and speech therapy.

Utah

150%

Greater than nominal coinsurance. For example, $ 5 outpatient physician visits, $ 30 ER visit. Annual $ 1,000 cap.

Limited benefit package. Adults get primary and preventive care services (physician, durable medical equipment, emergency room care) but are not eligible for inpatient hospital or long-term care.

Vermont

185%

Families with incomes up to 150% of FPL pay annual enrollment fee of $ 80 per person; $ 100 per person fee for family income between 150% and 185% of FPL. Also, service-specific cost-sharing up to an annual out of pocket maximum of $ 750 for single persons and $ 1,500 for families.

Comparable to commercial benefit package offered to other Vermonters who are “adequately” insured.

Source: CMS

RC: eh