ARBITRATION; COLLECTIVE BARGAINING; CONTRACTS; TEACHERS; WAGES;

TEACHERS;

OLR Research Report


September 30, 2003

 

2003-R-0692

TEACHER SALARY NEGOTIATIONS

By: Judith Lohman, Chief Analyst

You asked for (1) a brief description of the collective bargaining and binding arbitration process for teacher contracts, (2) the 2003-04 teacher and school administrator contract negotiation schedule for Bolton and all other districts, and (3) a comparison of teacher salaries in Bolton with state averages and with other districts in the same Educational Reference Group (ERG).

SUMMARY

The TNA requires teacher contracts to be finalized no later than the deadline for the local board of education to submit its budget to the local fiscal authority. Thus, it ties its deadlines for each step in the process to the local budget submission date. Unlike the deadlines in the laws

governing collective bargaining for state and municipal employees, the TNA deadlines are firm. The parties cannot waive them by mutual agreement. The TNA process thus prevents Connecticut teachers and school administrators from working under an expired contract or without a contract.

Although the TNA gives each school district has the same amount of time to complete the process, differing budget submission deadlines produces a different negotiation schedule for each district. We enclose a copy of the SDE’s 2003-04 negotiation schedule showing budget submission deadlines and negotiation and, if necessary, mediation, and arbitration starting dates for each district negotiating new contracts this year.

According to 2002-03 teacher salary data for 54 school districts provided by the Connecticut Association of Boards of Education (CABE), Bolton’s minimum annual teacher salaries at each credential level (BA, MA, 6th year, and Ph. D) are comparable to those of 12 other districts with similar socioeconomic characteristics. But in all but one case, they are $ 1,000-$ 2,000 below the average for the 54 districts. Bolton’s maximum salaries for the various credential levels are lower than maximums in the 12 similar districts, and from 4% to 21% below the 54-district average maximums.

TEACHER COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND BINDING ARBITRATION PROCEDURE

Process and Deadlines

The process for negotiating teacher collective bargaining agreements is set out in state law, which specifies the negotiation steps and the timetable. The TNA requires teacher and school administrator contracts to be in place by the date the local board of education must submit its budget to the local fiscal authority. The law therefore sets starting and intermediate deadlines for all its steps so as to achieve that result. Unlike the state and municipal employee collective bargaining laws, the TNA does not allow the parties to mutually agree to waive the deadlines.

Table 1 below shows the TNA process from beginning to end, assuming impasses at all intermediate steps.

Table 1: TNA Collective Bargaining Process and Timetable

Step in Process

Deadline

(Days prior to budget submission date)

Local board of education meets and confers with local financial authority

240

Begin negotiations

210

Parties report agreement to education commissioner or, if none, begin mediation

160

Parties report settlement to education commissioner or, if none, begin arbitration

135, or four days after end of mediation, whichever is sooner

Parties notify commissioner whether they will submit impasse to mutually-agreed-upon single arbitrator or notify commissioner of the names of the party arbitrators each party selects to represents them

135, or four days after end of mediation, whichever is sooner

Parties notify commissioner of name of mutually selected single arbitrator or of mutually selected third arbitrator.

If parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator or third arbitrator, commissioner chooses one at random from SDE’s panel of neutral arbitrators.

130

Neutral arbitrator sends written notice of time and place of arbitration hearing in school district to parties, other members of arbitration panel (if impasse is to be heard by three-member panel), and to school district’s fiscal authority (by registered mail, return receipt requested)

At least five days before the hearing

Hearing begins

125-118 (i. e. , between the 5th and 12th day after selection of neutral arbitrator)

Hearing ends

100-93 (no later than 25 days after it begins)

Parties file last best offers on disputed issues along with any stipulated agreements to be incorporated into the award

Before the award is issued

First award issued – Arbitrator files copy with the parties, the education commissioner, and each town clerk of the school district

80-73 (no later than 20 days after hearing ends)

Local legislative body rejects first award at a regular or special meeting called to consider it

55-48 (25 days after receiving award)

Legislative body notifies commissioner and teachers’ union of rejection

45-38 (10 days after rejection vote)

Union must, and school board may, file written response to rejection with local legislative body and education commissioner

35-28 (10 days after receiving notice of rejection)

Commissioner selects review panel of three neutral arbitrators or, if parties agree, a single arbitrator

35-28 (10 days after receiving notice of rejection)

New panel or arbitrator begins review of first award

35-28

Review completed

15-8 (20 days after review panel appointed)

Final and binding decision issued and filed with parties

10-3 (25 days after second panel appointed)

If the parties reach an agreement prior to arbitration, the local board of education must file a copy with the town clerk of the district “forthwith. ” The town clerk, upon receiving a signed copy of the agreement, must notify the public that an agreement has been filed. The contract terms are binding unless rejected by the district’s local legislative body at a meeting held within 30 days, or at a referendum in which at least 15% of the eligible voters of the district participate. If the agreement is rejected, mandatory binding arbitration ensues within five days after the rejection. The date binding arbitration begins is considered the 135th day prior to the budget submission date (see Table 1).

Arbitrator Decision Criteria

Initial and review arbitrators are required to decide between the parties’ last best offers on each disputed issue based on criteria specified in the law.

Arbitrators must give priority to the public interest and the financial capability of the town or towns in the school district, including other financial demand on those towns. The law establishes an irrebuttable presumption that a town’s budget reserve of 5% or less is not available to pay for any item of an arbitration award. (An irrebuttable presumption is one in which proof of a fact’s existence is legally conclusive. )

The arbitrators must also consider, in light of the town’s financial capability:

Appeal of Arbitration Award

Either party to a TNA award may, within 30 days after the award is issued, ask the Superior Court to vacate or modify it. The court may do so after a hearing if it finds that the party’s substantial rights were prejudiced because the award: (1) violates constitutional provisions or statutes; (2) exceeds the arbitrators’ authority, (3) used illegal procedures; (4) is affected by some other legal error; (5) is clearly wrong according to reliable, truthful and substantial evidence on the whole record; or (6) is arbitrary, capricious, or shows an abuse of, or a clearly unwarranted exercise of, discretion.

TEACHER SALARY COMPARISON

Table 2 below shows 2002-03 teacher salary ranges for Bolton and 12 other economically and demographically similar towns and school districts as determined by the State Department of Education. SDE places school districts in nine groups, known as education reference groups or ERGs, based on socioeconomic status and characteristics of need derived from census, poverty, and enrollment data.

Bolton and the other districts listed in the Table 2 are in ERG C. ERG C has 38 school districts, including many regional school districts. The data below, which was provided by the Connecticut Association of Boards of Education (CABE), covers the 13 ERG C districts for which CABE has data. Since teachers are typically paid according to their credentials, the table shows each district’s 2002-03 minimum and maximum salaries for teachers with bachelor’s and master’s degrees and 6th year certificates. In addition, some of the districts, including Bolton, have separate salary scales for teachers with Ph. D degrees, which are also shown. The state averages given are based on data from the 54 districts for which CABE provided data.

Table 2: Minimum and Maximum Teacher Salaries for

Selected ERG C Districts 2002-03

District

BA

Min

BA

Max

MA

Min

MA

Max

6th Year

Min

6th Year

Max

Ph. D

Min

Ph. D

Max

Andover

$ 33,598

$ 53,333

$ 35,555

$ 55,638

$ 37,507

$ 56,794

   

Bethany

33,179

61,944

34,174

63,803

36,165

67,519

   

Bolton

31,529

51,709

35,984

59,505

39,233

52,694

$ 42,278

$ 65,694

Canton

31,906

47,100

35,443

62,625

37,039

67,256

   

Ledyard

35,040

56,433

36,720

62,904

39,928

66,027

42,984

69,082

Mansfield

36,031

55,887

37,532

63,657

39,535

66,843

   

Woodstock

33,717

55,445

35,549

57,545

37,922

69,747

39,880

62,046

Reg. 6

30,000

39,800

31,500

60,125

32,500

63,100

33,100

64,725

Reg. 10

31,823

43,057

34,034

61,300

36,035

65,000

   

Reg. 14

30,828

56,270

33,136

62,660

35,252

66,483

38,684

67,543

Reg. 15

32,453

52,914

35,497

63,350

       

Reg. 18

33,360

53,911

36,360

60,247

38,160

64,068

   

Reg. 19

35,021

52,377

37,231

62,721

39,442

64,932

41,653

67,143

State (54 districts)

33,677

53,867

36,426

62,748

39,046

66,941

43,533

72,193

Source: Connecticut Association of Boards of Education

JL: eh