
November 4, 2002 |
2002-R-0905 | |
CHARTER AND INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL UPDATE | ||
By: Judith Lohman, Office of Legislative Research Alan Shepard, Office of Fiscal Analysis | ||
You asked us to update our report (2001-R-0784) comparing state laws and funding for charter schools and interdistrict magnet schools to reflect changes made in the 2002 regular and special sessions.
SUMMARY
While charter school laws remain unchanged from 2001, the General Assembly made some significant changes in laws governing interdistrict magnet schools in 2002. There was no change in magnet or charter school funding.
The 2002 magnet school changes imposed additional enrollment restrictions on schools that begin operating after July 1, 2005; reduced the state's reimbursement for magnet school capital expenditures from 100% to 95% starting July 1, 2003; gave the education commissioner the power to review and oversee magnet school operating budgets; and allowed him, within available appropriations in FYs 2002-03 and 2003-04, to give schools supplemental grants to enhance their programs.
2002 CHANGES IN MAGNET SCHOOL LAWS
Enrollment Restrictions
For interdistrict magnet schools that start operating on or after July 1, 2005, PA 02-7, May 9 Special Session (MSS), limits the maximum enrollment from any one participating district to 75% of the school's total enrollment. Magnet schools already operating as of July 1, 2005 will continue to be bound by the existing 80% restriction on enrollment from any one district. PA 02-7, MSS, also limits the enrollment in a magnet school beginning operations on or after July 1, 2005 to between 25% and 75% minority students, as defined in the state's racial imbalance law. That law defines racial minorities as people whose racial ancestry the federal Census Bureau considers to be other than white. PA 02-7, MSS, prohibits schools that fail to meet these standards from receiving state magnet school operating grants, but it allows the commissioner to award an otherwise eligible school a one-year grant for good cause. He may not award such a grant for a second consecutive year.
Capital Expense Grants
PA 02-5, MSS, reduces the state's reimbursement for interdistrict magnet school capital expenses from 100% to 95% of the eligible costs. PA 02-6, MSS, makes the change effective July 1, 2003.
State Operating Budget Review and Oversight
PA 02-7, MSS, requires interdistrict magnet schools to include proposed operating budgets and funding sources with their annual applications for state operating grants. It requires them to meet with the education commissioner or his designee at his request to discuss these submissions.
Supplemental Grants
For FYs 2002-03 and 2003-04, PA 02-7, MSS, allows the education commissioner to give supplemental grants, within available appropriations, to enhance educational programs at magnet schools. He must first review and approve the interdistrict magnet schools' total operating budgets, including all their revenue and spending estimates.
CHARTER AND MAGNET SCHOOL FUNDING
The FY 2001-02 budget contained $ 33. 3 million for magnet schools from General Fund resources and an additional $ 2. 6 million for RESC- operated magnets from the FY 2000-01 surplus. For FY 2002-03, the amount of General Funds provided to magnet schools rose to $ 45. 2 million. The State Department of Education (SDE) requested a $ 6. 0 million increase in the FY 2002-03 amount but the legislature did not approve the increase. The additional money would have been used to meet needs of the magnet schools not accommodated within the existing magnet school formula.
The biennial budget contains $ 14. 7 million for charter schools from the General Fund in FY 2001-02 and $ 16. 3 million in FY 2002-03. SDE did not ask for any adjustment in these amounts.
COMPARISON OF CHARTER AND MAGNET SCHOOL LAWS
Table 1 compares statutory provisions governing interdistrict magnet and charter school approval, programs, students, special education and transportation requirements. It also shows the funding for each type of school. The charter school provisions of the table are unchanged from our 2001 report. The magnet school provisions have been modified to reflect the changes described above.
In addition to the requirements below for charter schools, other statutes govern charter renewals and revocations, staff qualifications, school evaluation, and charter application contents, among other things. Because there are no comparable laws on such matters for interdistrict magnet schools, they are not included here.
Table 1: Charter and Interdistrict Magnet Schools
Comparison of Laws and Funding
Charter School |
Interdistrict Magnet School | |
Eligible Applicants |
· Any person, association, corporation, organization, or other entity · Public or independent institution of higher education · Two or more boards of education cooperatively · Regional education service center (RESC) |
· Local and regional boards of education · Regional education service centers · Cooperative arrangements between two or more school boards |
Ineligible Applicants |
· Nonpublic school · Parent or group of parents providing home instruction |
· Regional vocational agriculture school · Regional vocational-technical school · Regional special education center |
Program requirements |
None |
· Support racial, ethnic, and economic diversity · Offer a special and high quality curriculum · Require students enrolled to attend at least half-time |
Approval Considerations |
· Effect of school on reducing racial, economic, or ethnic isolation in its region · Regional distribution of charter schools in the state · Potential for over-concentration of charter schools within a school district or contiguous districts |
For annual operating grants: · Whether program is likely to increase student achievement · Whether program is likely to reduce racial, ethnic, and economic isolation · Percentage of enrollment from each participating district · Other criteria as determined by the education commissioner |
State Approval Preferences |
· Schools serving children who live in priority districts or in districts where 75% or more of the students are members of racial or ethnic minorities · Schools located at work sites · Applicants that are higher education institutions |
None |
Approval Granted By |
· State Board of Education (SBE) for state charter schools · Local board of education and SBE for local charter schools |
Education commissioner |
Approval Process |
· SBE review for state charter schools; local board of education for local charters · Public hearing in district where school will be located · For state charter school, SBE must solicit and review comments from board of education of district where school will be located and from contiguous districts · For local charter school, the local board must survey teachers and parents in the district to determine if there is enough interest · SBE must vote on application within 75 days of receiving it; a local board must vote within 60 days of receiving an application and forward an approved application to the SBE within 75 days of receipt · Approval by majority vote · Approval may be subject to conditions · Charters may be delayed for up to one school year for the applicant to prepare |
· Determined by the education commissioner · Interdistrict magnet schools receiving capital construction grants must comply with regular school construction requirements, including General Assembly approval as part of the annual school construction priority list |
Enrollment Limits |
On and after July 1, 1999, each school may enroll no more than the lesser of · 250 students or, if a K-8 school, no more than 300 or · 25% of the enrollment of the school district where it is located |
· Schools that begin operating before July 1, 2005 may have no more than 80% of enrolled students from one participating district · Schools that begin operating on or after July 1, 2005 must (1) have no more than 75% of enrolled students from one participating district and (2) maintain a minority enrollment of at least 25% but no more than 75% · Private school students may enroll in public part-time programs so long as (1) they make up no more than 5% of the magnet school's full-time equivalent enrollment and (2) they are not counted for purposes of the state magnet school transportation grant |
Student Admission Criteria |
Required: · Provide open access on a space-available basis · If applicants exceed space available, must distribute places by lottery · Promote a diverse student body · Not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, athletic performance, or English proficiency Optional: · May limit enrollment to particular grade level or specialized educational focus · May give preference to siblings if applicants exceed space available |
· May not recruit students for purpose of interscholastic athletic competition |
Student Transportation |
· District where charter school is located must provide transportation to charter school for students living in district unless charter school makes other arrangements · District has option of providing transportation to its students attending charter schools outside district. If it does, costs are eligible for reimbursement in regular school transportation grant |
· Provided by the participating districts · Same kind as provided to children enrolled in other public schools · Special state transportation grants available up to $ 1,200 per student |
Special Education |
· School district where student lives must hold the planning and placement team meeting · District must invite representatives of charter school to participate in the meeting · On a quarterly basis, school district must pay charter school the difference between the reasonable cost of education for the student and the per-student amount the school receives from state, federal, local, or private grants · Charter school is responsible for ensuring the student receives services mandated by his IEP |
Same as charter school requirements except: · Payments from districts do not have to be quarterly · Magnet school is only responsible for providing services under IEP if student attends magnet program full-time |
School Construction Funding |
· May apply for low-interest loans from CT Health and Educational Facilities Authority (CHEFA) · In FY 02 and FY 03 each is eligible (one time) for up to $ 500,000 in funds for school improvements or refinancing previous debt through state bond funds |
· Before July 1, 2003, eligible for 100% funding of construction projects through the state's school construction grant program · Starting July 1, 2003, eligible for 95% funding of construction projects through the state's school construction grant program |
Operating Expense Funding |
· Eligible for $ 7,000 per student paid in four installments of 25% of total grant in July, September, January and April · Students in local charter school are counted in the ECS formula in the district in which they reside · Students in state charter schools are not counted within the ECS formula |
· Funding is formula-based and is dependent on the enrollment mix amongst communities. Maximum grant is equal to 90% of the ECS foundation or $ 5,301. 90 per student · Schools must include proposed operating budgets and funding sources with their annual applications for state operating grants and must meet with the education commissioner or his designee at his request to discuss these submissions · For FYs 03 and 04, the education commissioner may give supplemental grants, within available appropriations, to enhance educational programs at magnet schools after first reviewing and approving their total operating budgets, including all their revenue and spending estimates · Additional aid provided in FY 01 and FY 02 for RESC-operated magnets from surplus funds · Students in magnet schools are counted within the ECS formula |
School Transportation Funding |
· Funding is provided to local and regional school districts through the normal school transportation grant program for students provided transportation within district (mandated) and to those transported out-of-district (voluntary) |
· Funding is provided through the normal school transportation grant program for students transported within the district and through a separate grant of up to $ 1,200 per student for students transported out-of-district (expenditures over the $ 1,200 limit may be submitted for reimbursement in the following year in the normal school transportation grant) |
JL: eh