OLR Research Report


December 20, 2002

 

2002-R-1020

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED MICRO ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP BILL

 

By: John G. Rappa, Principal Analyst

Comment

This third set of goals (particularly facilitating the development of a permanent statewide infrastructure) suggests that such an infrastructure does not exist. But the administrative structure and process the bill delineates for assisting micro businesses suggests that it does. As discussed below, the bill requires DECD to award grants based on an organization's capacity to plan for and administer a micro enterprise development and financing program. But if the infrastructure does not exist, there may be no organizations that can meet the regulatory grant criteria DECD must adopt. For this reason, the state may first need to devote resources to helping organizations develop the skills and expertise needed to provide technical and financial assistance to micro enterprises.

Comment

The reference to "nonprofit program" appears to be a drafting error. Organizations are usually constituted as for profit or nonprofit organizations.

Comment

The bill does not specify the interest rate and the types of terms and conditions the organizations can impose on loan recipients. Interest allows the organizations to generate revenue for making additional loans and covering some of their operating costs, while the loan terms and conditions allow borrowers to develop a credit history. But these requirements could also discourage potential borrowers from applying for loans.