Table of Contents Sec. 22-322. Inspection and certification. The owner of any flock of poultry of
one hundred fowls or more may apply to the Commissioner of Agriculture to have such
flock examined, and may place it under the supervision of said commissioner, for the
purpose of eradicating infectious and contagious diseases therein, and, if he complies
with the regulations promulgated by said commissioner relating to the eradicating of
any such disease, the commissioner or any assistant or agent appointed by him may
make an examination and conduct blood or other tests of such flock, without expense
to the owner except the pro-rata cost of laboratory tests as determined by the department
of pathobiology at The University of Connecticut, with the approval of the commissioner. Such costs shall be collected by said department of pathobiology and may be
waived by the commissioner when birds are owned by fanciers of poultry under the age
of eighteen or over the age of sixty-five. Each fowl which reacts upon such examination
or test shall be condemned, removed, destroyed or quarantined subject to the direction
of the commissioner, his assistant or agent, and the premises occupied by any such fowl
shall be immediately cleaned and disinfected by the owner thereof, under the direction
of the commissioner, his assistant or agent, at such owner's expense. The commissioner
shall then issue to such owner a report or certificate of the condition of such flock in
accordance with the findings upon such examination and test or tests. No person shall
have any claim against the state for any fowl so condemned, removed, destroyed or
quarantined. The commissioner shall publish annually, or more frequently if he deems
advisable, a report of all flocks tested or examined. The owner of any flock of poultry
of less than one hundred fowls may, subject to the foregoing provisions, apply to the
commissioner to have such flock examined, tested and certified, provided the laboratory
cost as determined in accordance with this section shall be borne by such owner. When
any flock has been examined and accredited in accordance with the provisions of this
section, no further examination or test shall be made of such flock by the commissioner
or his assistant or agent, except at the owner's expense. Sec. 22-323. Sale of certified poultry. No person shall sell or offer for sale any
poultry or baby chicks as free from any such contagion or infection or eggs for hatching
as from fowls free from any such disease, unless such poultry or eggs have been certified
by said commissioner to be free from such disease or to be from fowls free from such
disease, as the case may be. Sec. 22-323a. Intensive poultry farming. Regulations. Inspection for noncompliance. (a) As used in this section and section 22-326f, intensive poultry farming means
the raising or maintaining of more than twenty thousand fowl, fed primarily by methods
other than grazing, and confined within one or more pens or buildings. The Commissioner of Agriculture shall adopt regulations in accordance with the provisions of chapter
54 concerning acceptable management practices of intensive poultry farming including
transportation of poultry waste on public roads. Sec. 22-323b. Access to pens or buildings. Regulations. The Commissioner of
Agriculture shall have access at all reasonable times to any pen or building used in an
intensive poultry operation. The commissioner shall comply with recommended state
and federal procedures for hygiene for poultry inspectors in any inspection of an intensive poultry operation. The commissioner shall adopt regulations in accordance with
chapter 54 to carry out the provisions of this section. Sec. 22-323c. Penalty. Any person who refuses, hinders or otherwise interferes
with access by the commissioner or his agent to any pen or building used in an intensive
poultry operation shall be fined not less than two hundred fifty dollars nor more than
one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than six months or both for each offense.
Each violation shall be a separate and distinct offense and, in the case of a continuing
violation, each day's continuance thereof shall be deemed to be a separate and distinct
offense. Sec. 22-324. Prevention of avian disease. Orders. Regulations re avian disease
and sanitary handling of eggs. (a) As used in sections 22-324, 22-324a and 22-325,
"poultry" means all domesticated fowl, including chickens, turkeys, water fowl and pet,
zoological or psittacine birds. Sec. 22-324a. Sanitary disposal facilities for dead poultry. As used in this section, "poultry" means chickens, turkeys, ducks, game birds and other domestic fowls.
Any person engaged in raising one thousand or more poultry for the sale of poultry and
poultry products shall register with the Commissioner of Agriculture annually on April
first. Each such person shall maintain on the premises where the poultry is kept facilities
for the sanitary disposal of birds which die otherwise than by slaughter. Such facilities
may be incinerators or disposal pits, or such other facilities as the commissioner may
approve. The commissioner may, by regulation, establish standards concerning size,
location and construction of such facilities to insure their adequacy to prevent the spread
of disease. Any person covered by this section who disposes of dead birds otherwise
than by use of such facilities shall be fined not more than fifty dollars. Sec. 22-325. Importation regulated. Each person, firm or corporation transporting into this state any live poultry shall cause the same to be accompanied by an
official health certificate from the state of exportation and a permit issued by the Commissioner of Agriculture in such form as he prescribes, provided each such permit shall
state the number of live poultry included in each shipment or consignment. The owner,
consignee or person having the custody of any such poultry coming into this state shall,
within forty-eight hours after the arrival of such poultry at its destination, give notice
in writing to the commissioner or his authorized agent of the arrival of such poultry,
which notice shall include the date of such arrival and the number of poultry therein.
Each shipment or consignment of live poultry brought or knowingly allowed to come
into the state shall be held in quarantine at its destination unless otherwise ordered by
the commissioner, until he causes such examinations and tests to be made as he determines and until he causes such poultry to be released or disposed of as herein provided.
The expense of quarantine and of examinations and tests shall be paid by the owner,
consignee or person having the custody of such poultry before the same is released. The
commissioner may cause any of such poultry, found upon examination or test to be
diseased, to be killed, and no such poultry so killed shall be sold for food except under
the direction of the commissioner. No such poultry imported into this state shall be sold
or offered for sale or be permitted to mingle with other poultry until the commissioner
has issued a certificate authorizing the release of such poultry. All baby chicks and
chicken hatching eggs transported into the state shall be accompanied by a health certificate which certificate shall certify that such chicks or eggs are from a pullorum free
flock. All psittacine birds, except budgerigars, imported into Connecticut to be offered
for sale in Connecticut shall remain in quarantine pursuant to this section for a period
of not less than seven days. Sec. 22-326. Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation which violates any provision of section 22-323 or 22-325, any regulation promulgated under section 22-323a or
22-324, or any order issued pursuant to section 22-324, shall be fined not more than
five hundred dollars for each day during which such violation continues, up to a maximum fine of twenty-five thousand dollars. Sec. 22-326a. Civil action by Attorney General. The commissioner may request
the Attorney General to institute a civil action in the superior court for the judicial district
of Hartford for injunctive relief to obtain compliance with sections 22-324 and 22-325. Sec. 22-326b. Cooperation with United States government. The Commissioner
of Agriculture may cooperate with the United States Department of Agriculture in any
national system adopted by said department for the eradication of avian diseases. The
commissioner may accept from the United States such assistance, financial or otherwise,
for the condemnation of diseased poultry, for remunerating the owners thereof, and for
carrying out the provisions of sections 22-324, 22-326a and this section, as may be
available from time to time. Upon the acceptance of such system by the Governor, the
United States Department of Agriculture shall have the right of inspection, quarantine
and condemnation of poultry and poultry products affected with any infectious, contagious or transmissible diseases or suspected to be affected with, or that have been exposed to, any such disease, and may enter any grounds or premises for these purposes.
They may call upon constables to assist them in the discharge of their duties in carrying
out the provisions of such national system and of this section, and constables shall render
such assistance when called upon. Sec. 22-326c. Compensation for destroyed property. (a) The owner of any property destroyed pursuant to section 22-324 may submit a claim to the Commissioner
of Agriculture for compensation for such property. The commissioner may approve
payment of the claim after the value of the property destroyed has been determined by
the commissioner and the owner thereof. No compensation shall be paid and no premises
restocked with poultry until such premises have been inspected and approved by the
commissioner. No owner shall be compensated by the state if such owner is compensated
at full market value from any other source for property destroyed pursuant to section
22-324. Sec. 22-326d. Orders re environmental or health hazards at intensive poultry
operations. Subsequent hearing. (a) The Commissioner of Agriculture, whenever he
finds after investigation, that any person who operated or is operating an intensive poultry operation regulated under the provisions of sections 22-323a to 22-323c, inclusive,
is causing, engaging in or maintaining, or is about to cause, engage in or maintain, any
condition or activity which in his judgment may result in the introduction or spread of
an environmental or health hazard, may take any action he deems necessary to prevent
such environmental or health hazard, including issuing an order, without prior hearing,
to such person to discontinue, abate or alleviate such condition or activity. Upon receipt
of such order such person shall immediately discontinue, abate or alleviate or shall
refrain from causing, engaging in or maintaining such condition or activity. The commissioner shall, within ten days of such order, hold a hearing to provide the person an
opportunity to be heard and show that such condition does not exist. Such order shall
remain in effect until ten days after the hearing within which time a new decision based
on the hearing shall be made. Sec. 22-326e. State lien against real estate as security for amounts paid to clean
up intensive poultry operations. (a) Any amount paid by the Commissioner of Agriculture pursuant to section 22-326d shall be a lien against the real estate of the person
causing the condition or activity in accordance with the provisions of this section. Sec. 22-326f. Permit for intensive poultry farming operation. Surety bond.
Suspension or revocation. (a) On and after July 1, 1989, no person shall commence
an intensive poultry farming operation without a permit from the Commissioner of
Agriculture. Any person seeking such a permit shall apply on forms provided by the
commissioner and pay an application fee of ten dollars. Upon receipt of a completed
application the commissioner shall cause an inspection to be made of the premises where
the applicant desires to conduct an intensive poultry farming operation. If the commissioner finds that such premises meet the requirements of sections 22-323a to 22-324a,
inclusive, and applicable regulations and may reasonably be expected to continue to
meet such requirements, he shall issue the permit. If the commissioner finds that the
premises do not meet such requirements, or may not reasonably be expected to continue
to meet such requirements, the application shall be denied. When any permit has been
denied the applicant may, within ten days of the notification of the denial, request in
writing a hearing and appeal before the commissioner or his designee. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the commissioner after a hearing may appeal to the superior
court for the judicial district in which he seeks to conduct such farming operation. No
permit granted under this section shall be transferable by the permittee, and each permit
shall apply to only one premise, which shall be specified in the permit. The commissioner
may issue only one permit for a premise.
Sec. 22-322. Inspection and certification.
Sec. 22-323. Sale of certified poultry.
Sec. 22-323a. Intensive poultry farming. Regulations. Inspection for noncompliance.
Sec. 22-323b. Access to pens or buildings. Regulations.
Sec. 22-323c. Penalty.
Sec. 22-324. Prevention of avian disease. Orders. Regulations re avian disease and sanitary handling of eggs.
Sec. 22-324a. Sanitary disposal facilities for dead poultry.
Sec. 22-325. Importation regulated.
Sec. 22-326. Penalty.
Sec. 22-326a. Civil action by Attorney General.
Sec. 22-326b. Cooperation with United States government.
Sec. 22-326c. Compensation for destroyed property.
Sec. 22-326d. Orders re environmental or health hazards at intensive poultry operations.
Subsequent hearing.
Sec. 22-326e. State lien against real estate as security for amounts paid to clean up intensive poultry operations.
Sec. 22-326f. Permit for intensive poultry farming operation. Surety bond. Suspension or
revocation.
Sec. 22-326g. Regulations.
(1949 Rev., S. 3369; 1959, P.A. 225, S. 1; 637, S. 2; 1961, P.A. 67; 1967, P.A. 779; 1969, P.A. 72; 1971, P.A. 872, S.
446, 448; P.A. 88-90.)
History: 1959 acts specified that examinations and tests to be without expense to owner "except the costs of laboratory
tests" and replaced commissioner of agriculture with commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural resources;
1961 act replaced commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture and
natural resources; 1967 act specified that laboratory costs are "pro-rata" as determined by commissioner; 1969 act allowed
waiver of laboratory charge when birds owned owned by "fanciers of poultry under the age of eighteen or over the age of
sixty-five"; 1971 act replaced commissioner of agriculture and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture; P.A.
88-90 substituted determination of the cost of laboratory tests by the department of pathobiology with the approval of the
commissioner for determination by the commissioner and provided for collection of such costs by the department of
pathobiology.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(1949 Rev., S. 3370.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) The Commissioner of Agriculture may inspect or cause to be inspected by his
agents any intensive poultry operation for compliance with the regulations adopted under subsection (a) of this section. He may issue orders as he deems necessary for the
correction of such noncompliance including the quarantine of premises and fowl.
(P.A. 81-231, S. 2, 6; P.A. 89-226, S. 5, 6.)
History: P.A. 89-226 added reference to Sec. 22-326f.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(P.A. 84-309, S. 1, 3.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(P.A. 84-309, S. 2.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) The commissioner shall forthwith cause an investigation of any poultry afflicted
with or exposed to any infectious, contagious or transmissible avian disease of which
he has knowledge, and shall apply any means he determines are necessary, including
quarantine or destruction, to exterminate and prevent the spread thereof. The destruction
of any poultry shall be conducted by the commissioner or his designee or by the owner
of such poultry under the supervision of the commissioner. The premises occupied by
any poultry destroyed shall be cleaned and disinfected by the owner under the supervision of the commissioner. The commissioner or his deputy, assistant or agent may enter
any premises where poultry is kept, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of
this chapter.
(c) In addition to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section and section 22-325,
if the commissioner has reasonable cause to believe that any poultry within the state is
threatened by any infectious, contagious or transmissible avian disease, he may issue
such order as he deems necessary to prevent the introduction or spread of such disease
in the state. Such order may include, but not be limited to, an embargo on the importation
of poultry or poultry products into the state from states or areas where any infectious,
contagious or transmissible avian disease is present or where the commissioner has
reasonable cause to believe such disease is present.
(d) When a bird is suspected of having psittacosis, the commissioner shall have the
right to: (1) Confiscate as many suspected birds as necessary to provide a sufficient
sample for laboratory testing; (2) quarantine all such birds on the premises occupied by
the suspected bird until any suspected, infected or contagious birds are considered safe,
as determined by the State Veterinarian, or are destroyed.
(e) The Commissioner of Agriculture shall adopt regulations in accordance with
the provisions of chapter 54 to implement this section including, but not limited to,
regulations for the examination, testing, quarantine, disinfection, preventive treatment,
destruction and disposition of poultry and poultry products affected with or exposed to
infectious, contagious and transmissible avian disease and for the establishment and
enforcement of minimum standards of sanitation to be observed in the storing, grading,
candling and packing of shell eggs at the farm.
(f) Notwithstanding any regulation to the contrary, the commissioner shall not be
responsible for testing and certifying poultry prior to any show or exhibition.
(1949 Rev., S. 3371; 1959, P.A. 637, S. 2; 1961, P.A. 67; 1969, P.A. 112, S. 1; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 446, 448; P.A. 84-
2, S. 1, 6; P.A. 85-613, S. 64, 154; P.A. 91-62, S. 2; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 91-10, S. 10, 20.)
History: 1959 act replaced commissioner of agriculture with commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural
resources; 1961 act replaced commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture and natural resources; 1969 act added Subsec. (b) re regulations concerning sanitation standards for storing, grading,
etc. eggs; 1971 act replaced commissioner of agriculture and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture; P.A. 84-
2 amended Subsec. (a) by authorizing commissioner to investigate flocks "exposed" to disease as well as those afflicted
with disease and by adding provisions detailing procedures when flock is destroyed re prevention of avian disease, inserted
new Subsec. (b) authorizing the commissioner to issue orders to prevent the spread of avian disease and relettered previous
Subsec. (b) accordingly, adding provision to said Subsec. re avian disease regulations; P.A. 85-613 made technical changes.
P.A. 91-62 inserted new Subsecs. (a) defining "poultry", and (d) concerning confiscation and quarantine of psittacine
birds, relettered previously existing Subsec. designators accordingly, and replaced references to "flock" with references
to "poultry"; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 91-10 added a new Subsec. (f) concerning commissioner's duties re testing and certification
of poultry.
See chapter 54 re uniform administrative procedure.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(1963, P.A. 154; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 446, 448.)
History: 1971 act replaced commissioner of agriculture and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(1949 Rev., S. 3372; 1959, P.A. 637, S. 2; 1961, P.A. 67; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 446, 448; P.A. 75-232, S. 1, 3; P.A. 91-
62, S. 3.)
History: 1959 act replaced commissioner of agriculture with commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural
resources; 1961 act replaced commissioner of agriculture, conservation and natural resources with commissioner of agriculture and natural resources; 1971 act replaced commissioner of agriculture and natural resources with commissioner of
agriculture; P.A. 75-232 substituted "poultry" for "fowls" and defined the term, required imported birds to be accompanied
by "official health certificate from the state of exportation" as well as permit, deleted exception which had allowed import
of baby chicks or poultry for breeding or exhibition without permit and added provision requiring that imported chicks
and fertile eggs be accompanied by health certificate; P.A. 91-62 deleted definition of "poultry" and requirement that
poultry be held intact in quarantine and established a minimum quarantine period for imported psittacine birds.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(1949 Rev., S. 3373; 1969, P.A. 112, S. 2; P.A. 75-232, S. 2, 3; P.A. 81-231, S. 3, 6; P.A. 84-2, S. 5, 6.)
History: 1969 act made penalty applicable to violations of regulations promulgated under Sec. 22-324; P.A. 75-232
increased maximum fine from one hundred to five hundred dollars; P.A. 81-231 made penalty applicable to violations of
Sec. 22-323a and made previously existing five hundred dollar fine applicable on daily basis, imposing twenty-five thousand
dollar maximum; P.A. 84-2 added a provision making violations of orders subject to the penalty.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(P.A. 84-2, S. 4, 6; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4−6.)
History: P.A. 88-230 replaced "judicial district of Hartford-New Britain" with "judicial district of Hartford", effective
September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993;
P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14,
1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective
July 1, 1995.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(P.A. 84-2, S. 3, 6; P.A. 00-99, S. 62,154.)
History: P.A. 00-99 deleted references to sheriffs, effective December 1, 2000.
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) The Commissioner of Agriculture shall adopt regulations in accordance with
chapter 54 establishing procedures for determining the value of property destroyed pursuant to section 22-324. Such procedures shall include provisions for arbitration and
appraisal by two appraisers, one chosen by the commissioner and one chosen by the
owner.
(c) Any funds appropriated to the Department of Agriculture for the payment of
compensation pursuant to this section shall not be expended for any other purpose.
(P.A. 84-260, S. 1, 2.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) The commissioner, within available funds, may incur expenditures or contract
with any person to discontinue, abate or alleviate the condition or activity.
(P.A. 87-504, S. 2, 5.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) A lien pursuant to this section shall not be effective unless (1) a certificate of
lien is filed in the land records of each town in which the real estate is located, describing
the real estate, the amount of the lien, the name of the owner as grantor and the name
of the person causing, engaging in or maintaining the condition or activity, if known,
and (2) the commissioner mails a copy of the certificate to such persons and to all other
persons of record holding an interest in such real estate.
(P.A. 87-504, S. 3, 5.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)
(b) The commissioner may require a surety bond in an amount not exceeding ten
thousand dollars as a condition of the permit described in subsection (a) of this section.
The bond shall indemnify the commissioner for expenses he may incur in carrying out
the provisions of section 22-326d.
(c) The commissioner may suspend or revoke a permit issued pursuant to subsection
(a) of this section for failure to operate in compliance with the provisions of sections
22-323a to 22-324a, inclusive, and applicable regulations. Whenever the commissioner
is satisfied of the existence of one or more reasons for suspending or revoking a permit,
he shall give notice to the permittee by registered mail of a hearing to be held in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 at the time stated in the notice. The commissioner
may compel the attendance of witnesses and the person complained against shall have
the opportunity to produce witnesses or other evidence in his behalf. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the commissioner after a hearing may appeal to the superior
court for the judicial district in which he conducts such farming operation.
(P.A. 89-226, S. 4, 6.)
(Return to TOC) (Return to Chapters) (Return to Titles)